☎️ Для связи @AntonVesna
Вышел на раннюю пенсию сам и помогаю другим. Публично инвестирую 3 000 000+ рублей. Финансовый советник с дипломом.
https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a35f9ed6fa92100ece51c3
Created
20 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 51 days, net -366. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,863–52,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 04:20
51,918
-62
19 Sept 2026, 05:19
51,980
-8
16 Sept 2026, 23:01
51,988
-4
14 Sept 2026, 23:17
51,992
-16
13 Sept 2026, 12:41
52,008
-10
11 Sept 2026, 17:58
52,018
-22
9 Sept 2026, 06:01
52,040
-9
6 Sept 2026, 01:20
52,049
-10
4 Sept 2026, 00:55
52,059
-6
2 Sept 2026, 16:55
52,065
-6
1 Sept 2026, 16:13
52,071
+1
31 Aug 2026, 15:38
52,070
-9
30 Aug 2026, 18:06
52,079
-5
29 Aug 2026, 16:05
52,084
-15
28 Aug 2026, 13:07
52,099
-12
27 Aug 2026, 11:25
52,111
-8
26 Aug 2026, 13:04
52,119
-3
25 Aug 2026, 15:03
52,122
-9
24 Aug 2026, 13:54
52,131
-14
22 Aug 2026, 23:05
52,145
first reading
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.44%
avg views ÷ 51,918 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,900
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
91 (21 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
205,760
Reactions total
2,832
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈198
Videos
≈27
Links
≈1,830
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,456 reactions across 89 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,884
44.7%
🔥
1,053
16.3%
🤔
778
12.1%
❤
678
10.5%
💯
306
4.74%
🫡
293
4.54%
🤷♂
137
2.12%
🤝
88
1.36%
👀
41
0.635%
👌
36
0.558%
🕊
28
0.434%
😎
25
0.387%
⚡
24
0.372%
👏
23
0.356%
🙏
20
0.31%
🦄
11
0.17%
🏆
9
0.139%
🎉
7
0.108%
🤓
7
0.108%
🤩
5
0.077%
3 further kinds
3
0.046%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,715 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.10%
1 of 91 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,450
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,410
over 90 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvqehZV
1
3 September 2026
3 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Итоги недели: поправки в Налоговый кодекс внесли поправки в настрой инвесторов
⚔️ Всю неделю шла борьба за отметку 2300 п. Холодным душем для быков стал проект бюджета, в котором повышаются налоги на дивиденды, купоны и проценты по вкладам. Хорошо, что ИИС, ЛДВ и сальдирование убытков пока с нами! А еще налог на фонды коснётся только закрытых и интервальных ПИФов.
💼 Портфель подготовлен к разным сценариям, в т.ч. к…
Всем привет!
📥 Получил от КИТ Финанс письмо по фондам FinEx. Просят подписать в личном кабинете Согласие на трансграничную передачу персональных данных, а также проверить актуальность анкетных данных, чтобы брокер мог взаимодействовать с ликвидатором фондов. К каждому счету депо, на котором учитываются фонды, должен быть открыт брокерский счет.
📱Рекомендую проверить почту и уведомления. Если ваш брокер запрашивает …
Новые налоги: что меняется для инвестора
🇷🇺 Новый бюджет 2027-2029 согласован в Правительстве. Нам интересны прежде всего поправки в Налоговый кодекс.
🔹 К "пассивным» доходам" (дивиденды, купоны, проценты по вкладам) вместо ставки 13/15% применяется прогрессивная шкала 13-22%. Это же касается налога на прибыль от продажи ценных бумаг и налога на имущество. То есть инвестиции, с точки зрения обложения, приравнены к…
🤷♂️ ОФЗ закладывают повышение ставки?
📈 Акции - на очередном геополитическом подогреве, но рынок долга игнорирует этот праздник. Индекс гособлигаций RGBI - сами видите на приложенном графике👇. Доходности на длинном конце кривой до 16,45%, при 14-м ключе. В теории, это ставка на его повышение. Банки не случайно потихоньку поднимают ставки по вкладам.
💡 Для вас не станет открытием, что в облигациях сидят “умные день…
❓ Почему россиян не особо радуют байбэки
👉 Свежий пример: МТС “встроил” buyback в свою дивполитику: 14% OIBDA - на дивиденды, 6% - на обратный выкуп акций (70%/30%). Компания считает себя недооценённой и готова трижды в год забирать с рынка свои бумаги, увеличивая тем самым прибыль на акцию. После новости MTSS стали лидером падения.
🇺🇸 На американском рынке байбэки - ключевой драйвер, наряду с ожиданиями по прибыли…
❓Брокеры открыли охоту за инвесторами, но кто заплатит больше?
С приходом осени наконец заработала система быстрых переводов ценных бумаг. А это значит, что перенос акций и облигаций от одного брокера к другому упростился до пары кликов.
Это отличный повод, чтобы обсудить, как будет проходить борьба брокеров за инвесторов. И выиграет в ней тот, кто предложит наилучшие условия.
📈 Рассмотрим, какой размер бонусов за…
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🏗 Уважаемые владельцы ипотечного жилья, оформившие кредит в 2025-26 годах!
❓Как вы на это решились? Я сам уже несколько лет плачу ипотеку с ежемесячным платежом около ₽50 тыс. в месяц, с учетом коммунальных платежей. Но у меня ставка 5,4% (семейная). Стало интересно, чем руководствуются люди, которые берут ипотеку по текущим ставкам.
✅ Понимаю, что причины у каждого свои, проведем небольшое исследование. Отметьте с…
📅 Самое важное на этой неделе
22 сентября
📌 Дом РФ $DOMRF - финансовые результаты по МСФО за 8 мес.
📌 Акрон $AKRN - ВОСА по дивидендам за прошлые годы.
👀 За чем следим на этой неделе
⚔️ Геополитика. Генассамблея ООН - 22-26 сентября. Встреча Трампа с президентом Ирана на полях ассамблеи. Речь Лаврова в ОНН - 26 сентября. Встреча Трампа и Си Цзиньпина в Вашингтоне - 24 сентября. Война с йеменскими хуситами, цены н…
Жестко…
📉 Ставку снизили с 21% до 14%, но легче почему-то не стало. Бизнес недоволен, число дефолтов на порядок больше, чем при 21%. А было ли вообще смягчение? Чтобы понять, смотреть надо не номинальную ставку, а реальную, т.е. за вычетом инфляции.
🛒 Сейчас: инфляция при ставке 14% - 6,24%, спред +7,8%. Жёстко… Для сравнения, в 2021 г. спред был всего 0,5%.
🌏 Из крупных экономик жёстче только в Бразилии (+9,5%) -…
🗳 О выборах
✍️ С 18 по 20 сентября выбирают новую Госдуму. Заодно 11 регионов выбирают глав, а 39 свои заксобрания. Итог прошлого созыва: 2980 законов за пять лет. Спорили мало: по подсчёту Володина, 68,5% законов приняли при поддержке всех фракций. Созыв можно сказать прошел под хорошо забытым лозунгом:«Не время для дискуссий». Создан целый пласт законодательства, касающегося войны, контроля интернета и пр.
👉 Моё …
🤷♂️ Итоги недели: опять не наш?
📈 Всё было за рост, особенно нефть выше $100. Но то, как Трамп быстро и без колебаний подписал закон об “адских санкциях”, вернуло инвесторов на землю. Наш он, или всё-таки не наш, узнаем через месяц, когда будет дедлайн по введению в действие.
💼 Не питаю иллюзий, не наращиваю риск в портфеле. Всё ещё высокая ставка - возможность заработать на процентном доходе. Все ещё относительно…
🙏19🤔9❤6👍4🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @smfanton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@smfanton edited 15 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Лимон на чай @lemonfortea · 239,013 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
КапиталопедиЯ |Инвест Идеи @kapitalopedia · 21,045 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
Инвестиции на диване @div_invest · 98,766 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Движение FIRE @wkpbro · 28,517 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Фининди | Александр Елисеев @Finindie · 72,817 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
NataliaBaffetovna | Инвестиции @NataliBaff · 43,341 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Alfa Wealth @alfawealth · 55,889 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
ДОХОДЪ @dohod · 70,328 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Дивиденды онлайн @divonline · 53,517 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Дивиденды Forever @divForever · 76,993 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Invest Era @usamarke1 · 61,168 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Abeta - акции, облигации, аналитика @aabeta · 27,834 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Инвестируй или проиграешь | Юрий Козлов @invest_or_lost · 27,253 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
IF Stocks @if_stocks · 120,090 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Финансовая нeзaвисимость @fndb777 · 66,033 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
InvestFuture @investfuture · 183,560 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Инвестдруг Ольга Сабитова @olgasabitova · 50,208 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Скиллгет | Онлайн образование @skillget · 80,986 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Федор Сидоров | Инвестиции – это просто @fedorinvest · 68,894 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
ИнвестТема | Литвинов Владимир @particular_trader · 35,473 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Кошелек с Биткоинами | Алексей Чечукевич @wallet_with_bitcoins · 86,686 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
Школа безопасных инвестиций @finraonline · 44,085 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ленивый инвестор” (@smfanton), 51,918 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smfanton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.