Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Психолог Марк Бартон

@markbarton_mb

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

89,494subscribers

-178 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001421873154
TypeChannel
Username@markbarton_mb
DescriptionКанал психолога и телеведущего Марка Бартона. Главный канал: @womancan_mb №4785517527
Created11 October 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/markbarton_mb

Growth

89,49489,67289,5837 August 2026 — 89,672 subscribers7 August 2026 — 89,672 subscribers8 August 2026 — 89,644 subscribers9 August 2026 — 89,618 subscribers10 August 2026 — 89,579 subscribers11 August 2026 — 89,566 subscribers12 August 2026 — 89,535 subscribers13 August 2026 — 89,494 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89,467–89,699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:3789,494-41
12 Aug 2026, 05:5289,535-31
11 Aug 2026, 05:4289,566-13
10 Aug 2026, 03:5289,579-39
9 Aug 2026, 05:1289,618-26
8 Aug 2026, 03:1389,644-28
7 Aug 2026, 06:0089,672no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:5989,672first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.43%
avg views ÷ 89,494 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.749%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (14 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total39,930
Reactions total299
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
736
Videos
383
Links
1,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
52m 10s
Average length
10m 26s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

528 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26650.4%
❤‍🔥9918.8%
👍7614.4%
🎉468.71%
🔥193.60%
🥰142.65%
👏71.33%
💋10.189%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 528reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.00%
1 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,920
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,270
over 24 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxdvEPm17 August 20267 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC930 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @womancan_mbPhoto

Это видео сложно смотреть, но его необходимо увидеть каждой матери, которая воспитывает сына. Я поднимаю тему, о которой принято молчать, но которая разрушает жизни и психику мальчиков, превращая их в мужчин, неспособных строить здоровые отношения. Речь идёт о психологическом и физическом инцесте, когда мать, сама того не осознавая, превращает сына в своего мужчину. Я разбираю реальные истории из практики, которые п

5

12 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @womancan_mbVideo

Очень актуальный вопрос сегодня разбирала Людмила Балик на эфире, запись принёс, будет также MAX. Людмила рассказала как отличить обычную усталость от хронического стресса и депрессии, а также о том, что можно сделать уже сегодня, чтобы облегчить своё состояние. Почему здоровая усталость проходит после отдыха, а хронический стресс держит нервную систему в постоянном напряжении, и почему депрессия — это не просто гру

5

11 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,820 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Вышла вторая часть моего подкаста на канале Наташи Гасанхановой. И здесь мы снова говорим о том, о чём обычно спорят, замалчивают или боятся спросить напрямую. Первую часть, можно посмотреть тут ❗️Почему люди изменяют? Есть ли разница между мужской и женской изменой? Можно ли оправдать измену? Как токсичные отношения влияют на нашу дальнейшую жизнь? А ещё поговорили про 50/50 в отношениях, мужчин-содержанцев и раз

15

9 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈2,440 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @womancan_mbPhoto

🏡Сожительство — рай для мужчины и ловушка для женщины. Многие женщины соглашаются на совместное проживание, думая, что это шаг к браку, но для мужчины это чаще всего просто удобный формат без обязательств. Он получает всё — быт, секс, заботу, уважение, — но при этом ничего не обещает. А женщина теряет самооценку, время и шанс на действительно зрелые отношения. В новом видео я разбираю, почему сожительство почти все

❤‍🔥1914🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC≈2,920 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqxdvEPm

​🔥 Новый интенсив, который может изменить ваше представление о себе. Сколько раз вы обещали себе начать новую жизнь? С понедельника. После отпуска. Когда станет легче. Когда появятся силы… Но проходят месяцы, а внутри все то же ощущение: — жизнь в постоянном напряжении; — забота обо всех, кроме себя; — бесконечные разочарования в отношениях. Если вы узнали себя — приглашаю вас на новый бесплатный диагностический

6

5 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈2,950 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙈«Принимай меня таким, какой я есть!». Почему тотальное принятие — это миф. В отношениях мы слышим это снова и снова. Партнёр говорит: «Я такой, какой есть, и не собираюсь меняться». И вы пытаетесь это принять, ведь так действует любовь: терпит, оправдывает, надеется. А внутри нарастает напряжение, потому что вы принимаете то, что делает вам больно, и не знаете, как сказать «стоп». В новом видео я разбираю, где про

12❤‍🔥5👍3

5 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈2,870 views141 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎂От лица всей команды хотим поздравить нашего руководителя, вдохновителя и главного психолога интернета — Марка Бартона. Сегодня у Марка день рождения, и мы хотим сказать ему слова благодарности. Быть частью команды, которую он создал — это большая честь и ответственность. Мы видим, сколько сил, времени и души он вкладывает в каждый проект, каждое слово, каждую идею. 💜Марк, вы сделали невозможное — вы создали прост

❤‍🔥63🎉4317🥰12👏6

29 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC≈4,010 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @womancan_mbPhoto

💬За 20 лет работы с женщинами я услышал тысячи историй. И да, есть проблемы, которые встречаются чаще всего. – Где найти достойного мужчину? – Как быть, если отношения не радуют? – Как пережить развод? В новом видео я рассказываю, почему женщины годами страдают в одних и тех же сценариях, как привычка обвинять других мешает увидеть собственные паттерны и почему смещение фокуса на себя — это не про «прокачку женстве

👍11

26 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC≈4,710 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @womancan_mbPhoto

Он изменился? Или просто сменил маску?🎭 Вы расстались, а он снова пишет, звонит, просит прощения. Ходит к психологу, плачет, вспоминает ваше лучшее, общается с детьми, дарит подарки. А потом — резко исчезает. И вы в тревоге. И внутри уже зреет мысль: «А вдруг он на самом деле понял всё?». В новом видео я разбираю 9 приёмов, которые абьюзеры используют, чтобы вернуть жертву в отношения. Это не случайность. Это грязн

👍76

23 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC≈3,920 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @blagoveshenskayVideo

В этом выпуске я снова встретилась с Марком Бартоном — российским психологом, телеведущим, коучем, писателем и ректором Международного института психологии и психотерапии (МИПИП). Год назад его советы взорвали интернет и вызвали бурю споров. Я обещала проверить их на себе. Что получилось? Вышла ли я замуж? И почему мой личный эксперимент чуть не превратился в психологическую ловушку? Мы с Марком разобрали самые ост

5👍4

19 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC≈3,770 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @womancan_mbPhoto

Он смотрит на других женщин! Ресторан, пляж, лента социальных сетей — и вдруг ваш мужчина задерживает взгляд на проходящей мимо девушке. Или лайкает фото, которые вызывают у вас вопросы. Внутри сразу зарождается паника: а вдруг я ему не нравлюсь? А вдруг он меня разлюбил? В новом видео я предлагаю вместе порассуждать на эту тему. — Почему мужчины смотрят на других женщин, даже если любят свою жену? — Как отличить

11👍3

17 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC≈3,840 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @womancan_mbPhoto

✔️Москва, до встречи завтра, на VK Fest, ВДНХ!

6👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @markbarton_mb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 458,991 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сатья. Официальный канал
@satyadas_official · 199,272
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Метод Лабковского
@labkovskiy · 190,548
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психолог Марк Бартон” (@markbarton_mb), 89,494 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markbarton_mb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.