Channel
@ZLWBG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
104,758subscribers
-2,933 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001988183330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZLWBG |
| Description | 本群内容：🏆曝光频道🏆 广告投放 投诉建议 请联系： @tingnuan1 @ck2019 众联商务合作中心 @SWZLW 众联站群 https://t.me/SWZLW 🌈曝光信息一定要真实。我们也没办法去调查信息的真假。如果有误联系管理删除就行。请不要纠结我们。谢谢 ⚠️频道广告不作担保，上门探访过属于担保，如有担保会进行备注：认证广告！！！ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZLWBG |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 104,758 | -790 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 105,548 | -582 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 106,130 | -478 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 106,608 | -578 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 107,186 | -505 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 107,691 | first reading |
109 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 109 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 109 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,580 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 25 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 96.4% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友投稿 灵异之事，真的不能拿来开玩笑… 姜小柔是一名24岁的网红Vlogger，拥有超过100万粉丝。她因长期制作反对迷信、破除迷信相关内容而走红。 她曾发布过一段广为流传的视频，视频中她将一尊已经开光的观音像砸碎，还若无其事地与粉丝开玩笑说道： “大家放心点关注吧，看看我还能活多久。要是哪天真的出了什么事，那就请大家来参加我的葬礼、吃席，不就行了吗……” 近日，她却突然遭遇了一起严重交通事故。在送往医院的途中，由于失血性休克、严重脑损伤、多器官功能障碍并陷入深度昏迷，最终抢救无效身亡。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
👍1
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🇵🇭菲律宾马尼拉🙈🙈⚡️ 🇱🇰斯里兰卡⚡️ 🇻🇳岘港皇冠😀 会安南😀 🇰🇷济州天城😀 😊亚洲多厅齐开，实力毋庸置疑👑 😊老牌贵宾厅，从无黑牌卡款事件👑 😊Solaire高清视频电投24H实时直播👑 😊线上线下不限IP，随时可玩⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🤣🤣 🤣🤣 🤣🤣 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
👍1
华人加密币大亨在巴拉圭全裸坠亡，身价超20亿美元 #币圈新闻：8月7日凌晨，华人加密货币投资人叶俊德（Harry Chun Tak Yeh）在巴拉圭首都亚松森的豪华公寓楼外身亡。 当地警方初步认定其从约30层高楼处坠落，遗体全裸，被黑色塑料袋覆盖。 检方正就意外、自杀或他杀等多方向展开调查，尸检结果尚未公布。加密货币圈有人猜测原因可能是抢劫加密货币。 公开资料显示，叶俊德出生于中国香港，童年移居加拿大，常被描述为加拿大籍华人加密货币投资者。2013年比特币价格仅为60美元时，他进入加密货币市场抄底，由此积累了巨额财富。其个人官网称，叶俊德本人及合作伙伴管理的资产超过20亿美元。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
#缅甸局势 掸邦北部孟密 缅甸军方昨天使用榴弹炮，无人机投弹，以及战斗机突袭了娘尼村。 袭击于8月11日下午2点左右开始，以清剿行动为主，缅甸军方单方面开火，能听到重型武器和枪声的声音，空袭只开了一枪。 由于军方的单方面开火，附近居民也纷纷逃往孟密娘尼，目前尚不清楚是否有人员伤亡。 克钦独立军（KIA）和掸邦军（SSPP）在娘尼村附近活动，据称军方开火是为了迫使他们离开该地区，但掸邦媒体无法单独证实这一说法。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
#柬埔寨 #野往 #王猛 骗路费恶心的人渣 此人外号野往，湖南龙山人。之前在西港公司上班，后来柬埔寨扫荡回国。 大概六月左右，求我安排他们一行人出来，我打了几千块路费。到了广州又各种事情找我要钱，我直接把订好的泰国机票退了。 这几天又跑来各种卖惨，说在国内活不下去，想出来赚钱。我心软又答应了，但吸取上次教训，事先说好全程不打一毛钱路费。 我给他打车到广州白云，订酒店，安排吃饭。没想到今天联合滴滴司机，装模作样说已上车往广州赶。实际上根本没上车，还跟司机串通，如果我打电话就说他到了。 不是，你们他妈的这么活不起吗？这里跟你掏心掏肺，你却玩脑筋骗那点路费，能致富不是？ 哪天在东南亚的盘总要是接到这货，务必避雷。被骗事小，太他妈恶心人了！把兄弟对你的信任用在这种地方，你也是够活不起的。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
👍1
🇰🇭#西港 #海悦 刚刚也被宪兵队照顾了，现在已经进去检查了 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
👍1
#老挝万象雅典饭店被突袭 这次里面的推推在劫难逃了，直接全部围起来了。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
👍1
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀 💞💞💞💞💞💞✡️😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀九博官方频道：👉@JBGJ 😀九博官方开奖：👉@JBKJ 😀九博上下分群：👉@jiubovip 😀九博国际主营: ⚡️😀😀😀 ⚡️ 😀😀 ⚡️😀😀 ⚡️😀😀 ⚡️😀😀⚡️😀😀❤️😀😀等多种游戏... 🔥九博扫雷点击进入🔥 全新玩法，震撼上线！ 热门彩种，火力全开！ 激情升级，精彩加倍！ 抢先体验，赢在每一局 九博国际放心玩 · 放心赢 · 放心提！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🏦钱包验资： @kpay 💁♀️官方客服： @J111~@J888 💁♀️官方财务： @j444~@j666 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
24岁中国女生泰国失联，中使馆确认：家属已向使馆求助，将提供必要协助；好友透露其轻信陌生人“顺路送她去清迈”，上车后彻底失联。 当地时间8月11日，针对网络关注的中国女性祁萌赴泰后失联一事，中国驻泰国使馆向央视新闻总台记者确认：祁萌家属已向使馆求助。使馆已向家属告知泰国警方受理相关案件的程序和要求，并将继续为家属提供必要协助。 据媒体此前报道，24岁中国女子祁萌在泰国失联，系第一次出国。 其好友网红陈泽在直播中透露，祁萌先于马来西亚游玩，随后搭乘航班飞抵曼谷。然而，在机场外，她轻信了陌生人“顺路送她去清迈”的邀约，上车后便与外界彻底失联。 网络上流传的求助帖则披露了祁萌失踪前的详细信息：她在马来西亚吉隆坡游玩一周后，于8月2日上午9点搭乘MH784航班飞往泰国曼谷素万那普机场，随后便失去踪迹。 截至8月11日，她已失联超过一周。求助帖称，因过度担忧，其家属已病倒住院。祁萌的朋友甚至在网上表示，愿与绑匪沟通赎金事宜，只求…
#柬埔寨 #缅甸 此人外号大财，福建人。 之前在西港公司上班，后来柬埔寨扫荡去了缅甸，在缅甸朋友那里跑路后想来我这里做事，结果到了我这里没几天，钱花了，也给他预支了，不到10天又跑 人走了给他时间还钱，刚开始说的很好听，有了给我，后面信息不回，没态度，装死，本来是不想发他出来的，一而再再而三的不回信息，装看不见，恶心人，就当喂狗了 这种人他妈的这么活不起吗？这里跟你掏心掏肺，你却玩脑筋骗，能致富不是？ 在东南亚的盘总要是接到这货，务必避雷。被骗事小，太他妈恶心人了！把兄弟对你的信任用在这种地方，你也是够活不起的。 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
👍1
#网友投稿 #柬埔寨 被电诈盘总包养的职业捞女顶级小三 #耿少寒 云南人 全家户籍档案正在查档后续进行全网发布！此女蛇蝎心机女，表面在柬埔寨纯洁无瑕打着酒店管理的职位幌子参与电诈和洗钱犯罪 很多资金来源家属资产都是灰产所得 中国公安部门可以严查！涉及毒品交易，涉及拉人头参与电诈犯罪，买卖人口！其烂逼女一个，小三中的小三！而且心机婊被她盯上的男人最后都被伤的遍体鳞伤，与此女有染的男人可以去医院检查一下了！懂的大家都懂！你喜欢玩阴的那就全程陪你！ 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
❤1👍1
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀 💞💞💞💞💞💞✡️😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀九博官方频道：👉@JBGJ 😀九博官方开奖：👉@JBKJ 😀九博上下分群：👉@jiubovip 😀九博国际主营: ⚡️😀😀😀 ⚡️ 😀😀 ⚡️😀😀 ⚡️😀😀 ⚡️😀😀⚡️😀😀❤️😀😀等多种游戏... 🔥九博扫雷点击进入🔥 全新玩法，震撼上线！ 热门彩种，火力全开！ 激情升级，精彩加倍！ 抢先体验，赢在每一局 九博国际放心玩 · 放心赢 · 放心提！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🏦钱包验资： @kpay 💁♀️官方客服： @J111~@J888 💁♀️官方财务： @j444~@j666 🌈体育电竞推单频道 体育电竞交流💬
Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @ZLWBG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 116,816 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中文曝光吧 安危头条吃瓜（接广告合作）🫥” (@ZLWBG), 104,758 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZLWBG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.