Channel
@flb608
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,636subscribers
-46,401 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001953447072 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flb608 |
| Description | 👉菲律宾新闻大事件，疑难杂症来问我 👉本频道只负责相关发布信息，真假自行甄别 ☎️曝光 悬赏 广告： @yantou 为全球华人分享菲律宾文化，一起看最美的菲律宾 Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated the rules and policy of using Telegram. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flb608 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @jpz9118/9769012 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC | @flb608/86239 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @flb608/90913 · this entry13 Sept 2026, 05:48 UTC | @jpz9118/10234013 Sept 2026, 05:48 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpz9118/10682314 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC | @flb608/95418 · this entry14 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpz9118/10718616 Oct 2026, 15:38 UTC | @flb608/95782 · this entry16 Oct 2026, 15:38 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpz9118/10927530 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC | @flb608/97883 · this entry30 Oct 2026, 14:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @jpz9118/10929330 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC | @flb608/97901 · this entry30 Oct 2026, 15:58 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @jpz9118 | 1,589 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @jpz9118 (1,586–3) |
| @uae918 | 1,274 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @uae918 (676–598) |
| @MB104 | 1,179 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @MB104 (1,170–9) |
| @th769 | 852 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @th769 (837–15) |
| @bbb1b | 851 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @bbb1b (840–11) |
| @VN704 | 828 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @VN704 (812–16) |
| @mlxy458 | 820 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @mlxy458 (809–11) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6,730 of the 6,730 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,348 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @uae918. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:40 | 68,636 | -3,831 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 72,467 | -1,144 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:21 | 73,611 | +2,661 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:54 | 70,950 | -951 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 00:50 | 71,901 | -553 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:31 | 72,454 | -472 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:37 | 72,926 | -442 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:48 | 73,368 | -209 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:32 | 73,577 | -360 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 73,937 | -2,201 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:56 | 76,138 | -3,927 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:22 | 80,065 | -1,494 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:04 | 81,559 | -117 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:35 | 81,676 | -44 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 81,720 | -32 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 81,752 | -889 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 82,641 | -84 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:04 | 82,725 | -117 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:37 | 82,842 | -98 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 82,940 | first reading |
2,654 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 792 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,654 (9 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,723,793 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 05:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 301 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 792 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#美国继续禁止公民前往缅甸 美国国务院下属公民与安全事务部门11月9日发布公告，鉴于缅甸军事冲突期间多地安全风险严峻，建议并禁止美国公民前往缅甸。缅甸等23个国家被列为最高安全等级（第4级），即“完全禁止前往”，且美国政府对其公民的救援能力有限。 被美国列入禁止名单的国家中，东南亚的缅甸在列，还包括交战的乌克兰和俄罗斯，以及阿富汗、伊朗、伊拉克、朝鲜、叙利亚等共23国。自2021年军方政变以来，美国即以安全局势为由禁止公民前往缅甸，连续6年多维持第4级安全等级。 政变后，少数民族武装组织和革命武装控制了大部分地区，军方集团为夺回失地，正以大量兵力进行地面军事行动和空袭。 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【7T.COM】全球公认最稳！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀380亿U出款见证，持续为用户提供稳定可靠体验 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀行业领先出款效率，58秒见证极速服务体验。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 持续稳定增长，都是各位老板的信任见证。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 实力积累，赢得行业各老板的认可。 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 每月千万美金投入，致力打造行业品牌标杆。 😀😀😀😀：【7T.COM】 😀😀😀😀：【官方飞投】 😀😀😀😀：【@uuu7t】 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
#老挝资讯：万象捣一网络犯罪窝点，抓获1名韩国籍嫌疑人！ 老媒媒体11月10日报道：上周，老挝公安部专项工作组在万象市赛色塔县亮桑村一处出租屋，抓获1名韩国籍男子。 行动现场查获手机41部、笔记本电脑5台、iPad 8台等作案工具。 目前，案件正在进一步侦办中。 电信文脉在万象止步于此… 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
#吃瓜 #瑜伽 #美女 美女练瑜伽练的真是游刃有余 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
#网友投稿 这个死骗子，骗了我3000u！叫你们付定金才会安排妹子。我付了，结果把我拉黑，世界的败类！ ps：捞偏门这行业还是有救的，别说大环境不好，照样有人被骗。😂😂 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
#网友问小姐姐 要是你被刚分手的人，跪下逼你求复合，你会复合吗？ ps：这样的好兄弟去哪里找啊？😂😂 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
马达加斯加与美国签署司法合作协议，联手打击跨国网络诈骗，13处诈骗中心已被捣毁 据11月9日马达加斯加媒体报道，马达加斯加司法部长Fanirisoa Ernaivo于11月5日在华盛顿会见美国哥伦比亚特区联邦检察官Jeanine Ferris Pirro。双方重点讨论了跨国网络诈骗案件的调查与司法协作。 美国方面表示，在马达加斯加当局与美国联邦调查局（FBI）的合作下，当地已有 13处网络诈骗中心被捣毁。此前的联合执法行动还查获超过3200件电子设备。 Jeanine Ferris Pirro肯定马达加斯加在打击网络诈骗方面采取的刑事追责措施，并鼓励该国继续加强执法力度，为非洲其他国家提供合作经验。 此次签署的合作备忘录涉及司法经验交流、信息共享及跨国犯罪打击等领域。双方还讨论了涉案人员移交美国接受司法处理的问题。 马达加斯加与美国表示，将继续深化司法合作，共同追查跨国犯罪网络及其资金流向，进一步打击网络诈骗犯罪。 …
现在越南妹子越来越会了 #吃瓜 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
#印尼资讯：爆出非法监听丑闻，4名高级警官涉案，总统及多名政商人士疑遭监控 11月9日报道，印尼近日爆出一起涉及警方高层的非法监听丑闻。印尼有关部门正在调查多名高级警官涉嫌滥用警方监听系统、未经合法程序监控重要人物通讯活动的案件。 据报道，案件目前涉及4名高级警官，其中包括前国家警察总长利斯蒂约·西吉特·普拉博沃（Listyo Sigit Prabowo）。调查显示，涉嫌被监听的对象包括印尼总统普拉博沃，以及政府官员、政治人物、媒体记者和商界人士等。 初步调查发现，涉案人员涉嫌未经正式审批，将多个电话号码录入警方合法监听管理系统（LIMS），从而实施非法通讯监听。调查人员还怀疑，部分涉案人员曾试图删除系统内的相关记录，以掩盖监听活动。 执法部门已扣押11部手机、1台iPad及4个USB储存设备，作为案件调查证据。 事件曝光后，印尼政府正考虑加强监听设备及相关系统的管理，并研究对总统府等重要场所开展安全检查，以排查是否存…
电视剧都不敢这么演卧槽 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
#网友爆料 这个人叫代号叫木子，也叫老黑，福建厦门人，之前是世纪万安的代理，后面去了亚太，11月6日，他联系我说他爸爸噶了，需要急着回去，我在亚太大酒店接到他，出于信任给他边境到付 第三天的晚上，然后我叫他付款路费，他说把我的地址已经发给他公司管理，等到第二天中午，他说他的飞机被被别人盗取了，他的管理把钱转给他骗子，然后他说他只能叫家里人联系重新打路费，一拖再拖 跑我6500u 在11月10号今天中午在云南边境，司机给他拿饭他跑了，我想说的是你丢了福建人的脸，这么一点钱，你爸爸死了，筹路费凑了两三天，这种垃圾狗，难怪公司不管你，没有信任，谁会出来给你做事 难怪招不到员工，不管出于什么原因，你tm的跑路费，cnm，我会把你的照片所有资料发给国内，发到各大网上，你等着吧。 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
看美胸直播 🛎华人新闻：@GFFFF ☎️投稿爆料：@yantou
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,654 posts we hold for @flb608. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“菲律宾新闻大事件” (@flb608), 68,636 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flb608.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.