Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 爵士

Channel
@tiyu_3
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
112,239subscribers
-751 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001891131801 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tiyu_3 |
| Description | 本群内容:🏆体育推单🏆 广告投放 投诉建议 请联系: @tingnuan1 @ck2019 众联商务合作中心 @SWZLW 众联站群 https://t.me/SWZLW |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tiyu_3 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 50 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @tiyu_3/92348 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC | @tiyuquan/7518328 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @tiyu_3/92527 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | @tiyuquan/7536731 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @tiyu_3/92598 · this entry1 Sept 2026, 17:14 UTC | @tiyuquan/754461 Sept 2026, 17:14 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @tiyu_3/92861 · this entry7 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC | @tiyuquan/757337 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @tiyu_3/93529 · this entry24 Sept 2026, 04:43 UTC | @tiyuquan/7661224 Sept 2026, 04:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @tiyu_3/93778 · this entry2 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTC | @tiyuquan/769572 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @tiyuquan | 100 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (89–11) |
| @ybgf9 | 85 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7 minutes | this entry (85–0) |
| @tiyutuidan08 | 33 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (33–0) |
| @SJBhongdan | 28 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 10 minutes | this entry (28–0) |
| @OZBhongdan | 23 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 16 minutes | this entry (23–0) |
| @jnty135 | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 25 minutes | this entry (22–0) |
| @SJB00001 | 16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.94 | under a minute | this entry (15–1) |
| @TiYu9812 | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (11–3) |
| @ZLWBG | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 27 hours | @ZLWBG (7–6) |
| @duanzib | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @duanzib (14–0) |
| @cx164 | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 46 minutes | this entry (11–0) |
| @uefagogogo | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 2 minutes | this entry (10–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 40 of the 40 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 329 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 50 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @J9yaya. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 50 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 08:19 | 112,239 | -479 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 09:49 | 112,718 | -356 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 23:52 | 113,074 | -939 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 114,013 | -594 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:30 | 114,607 | -330 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 114,937 | +29,489 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:18 | 85,448 | -369 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:20 | 85,817 | -339 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:35 | 86,156 | -156 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:08 | 86,312 | -187 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 86,499 | -157 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 86,656 | -133 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:14 | 86,789 | -135 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 86,924 | -138 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:15 | 87,062 | -93 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 87,155 | -126 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 87,281 | -93 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 87,374 | -160 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:17 | 87,534 | -180 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 87,714 | first reading |
2,632 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 217 of 611 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,632 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 606,701 |
| Reactions total | 430 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 18:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
595 reactions across 293 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 207 | 34.8% | |
| 👍 | 166 | 27.9% | |
| ❤ | 127 | 21.3% | |
| 👎 | 26 | 4.37% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 4.03% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 1.34% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 1.18% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.672% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.672% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.672% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.672% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.672% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.504% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.336% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.168% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.168% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.168% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.168% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.168% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 326 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 595 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 1 October 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 611 posts held from the last 30 days (0.327%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 爵士
西班牙乙组联赛 马略卡 v 科尔多瓦 足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (0 - 1) 大 2.5
Signed 爵士
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 爵士
欧洲国家联赛A 挪威 v 威尔士 足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (0 - 0) 大 1.5 / 2
Signed 爵士
足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 - 上半场(0 - 0) 荷兰乙组联赛 布雷达 v 埃门 大 0.5 / 1
Signed 爵士
【2028体育】TG全网最大信誉台|玩家首选 东南亚顶级线上娱乐 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ #集团耗资2亿美金打造全网最权威线上娱乐平台 🤩🤩❤️🤩 20281429.com 人民币平台 老品牌·值得信赖·相信品牌的力量 🤩🤩🤩🤩 y30658.com USDT平台 全网最高返水 返水3%每日无上限 😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 大户首选(安全保障客户信息安全) 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 《极速赢家》一路狂飙 640000巨奖强势到手💥 黄金树下,好运一来,大奖根本挡不住,豪赢457万,秒提款 💥 《麻将胡了2》好运加码,喜获5350000巨奖,惊喜根本停不下来 💥 🌟 2028体育欢迎各大老板盘总娱乐 #东南亚超高爆率电子人民币台 PG电子单注可拉2万一转 百家乐单注限红可打20万一注 (大额提款无忧) 😅😚😏😝😍😀😃😃😅😏🙃😢 专属客服 @KF98…
Signed 是听暖呀~ (接广告合作看简介)
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 😋 超级玩家赌神附体,狂揽1.6亿,可自行验证真伪 🤩🤩🤩🤩 y3505.com USDT平台 品牌铸就非凡 · 实力绝非偶然 🤩🤩❤️🤩 20281168.com 人民币平台 2028年奥运会官方合作伙伴 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 全网广告费每月投入高达1000万U+,Y3 无处不在 #大户首选 免实名 免手机号 电子可3000U一拉 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡😃😃😃😃 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 1、 仅用300u爆奖140万u,成功提款 145万u 2、 用4u玩极速糖果1000爆12500倍赢4.9万U 3、 真人百家乐大放水 20万赢走600万U 4、 大哥一周内拉【麻将胡了】盈利1340万U 5、 世界杯 大神买两场波胆收米260万U 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀⚡⚡⚡⚡ #Y3国际 #全网福利天花板 1、单笔提款50万U+ ,赠送5888U-88888U额外奖…
Signed 是听暖呀~ (接广告合作看简介)
足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (1 - 1) 希腊超级联赛乙组U19 马尔科1927 U19 v 皮尔戈斯U19 大 2.5 / 3
Signed 爵士
足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (1 - 1) 希腊超级联赛乙组U19 马尔科1927 U19 v 皮尔戈斯U19 大 3.5 / 4
👍1
Signed 爵士
足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (6 - 0) 国王杯(在泰国) 泰国 v 文莱 大 6.5 / 7
👍1
Signed 爵士
欧洲国家联赛B 科索沃 v 以色列 足球 (滚球) 球队进球数: 科索沃 - 大 / 小 - 上半场(0 - 0) 大 0.5
👍1
Signed 爵士
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Signed 爵士
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,632 posts we hold for @tiyu_3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“体育电竞推单交流 欧洲杯中文赞助(接广告合作)🫥” (@tiyu_3), 112,239 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiyu_3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.