欧洲女子冠军联赛预选赛 滚球中 0 - 0 皇家社会(女) vs 切尔西(女) 上半场 大/小 (香港盘) 大(0.5/1) @ 0.76

Channel
世俱杯 世界杯 欧洲杯 体育滚球推单
@TG408
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,796subscribers
+716 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001714821836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TG408 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TG408 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 13,796 | +106 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 13,690 | +15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 13,675 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 13,673 | +60 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 13,613 | +19 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 13,594 | +31 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 13,563 | +22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 13,541 | +12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:23 | 13,529 | +18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 13,511 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:28 | 13,505 | +25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 13,480 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 13,486 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 13,483 | +16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 13,467 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 13,462 | +15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 13,447 | +38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 13,409 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 13,413 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 13,414 | first reading |
Engagement
310 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.47%
- avg views ÷ 13,796 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 341
- 56 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.464%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 56
- of 310 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 310 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 19,109 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 25m 18s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
98 reactions across 57 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 73.5% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 9.18% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 8.16% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 310 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 310 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
意大利杯 乌迪内斯 vs 威尼斯 (03/09 00:00) 乌迪内斯(-0.5) @ 0.84 丹麦超级联赛 奥胡斯 vs 中日德兰 (03/09 02:00) 大(3) @ 1.01 英格兰冠军联赛 米尔沃尔 vs 威斯汉姆 (03/09 02:45) 小(2.5) @ 0.84 英格兰冠军联赛 女王公园巡游者 vs 卡迪夫城 (03/09 02:45) 女王公园巡游者(-0.5/1) @ 1.04 英格兰冠军联赛 西布罗姆维奇 vs 查尔顿 (03/09 02:45) 西布罗姆维奇(-0.5/1) @ 0.82 英格兰冠军联赛 伯恩利 vs 米德尔斯堡 (03/09 03:00) 大(3) @ 0.93 3串:乌迪内斯+女王公园巡游者+中日德兰
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
意大利杯 滚球中 0 - 0 萨索洛 vs 弗罗西诺内 上半场 大/小 (香港盘) 大(0.5/1) @ 0.63
中国足协杯 滚球中 0 - 0 云南玉昆FC vs 重庆铜梁龙 上半场 大/小 (香港盘) 大(0.5) @ 0.97
Photo, posted without a caption
马来西亚足总杯 滚球中 0 - 0 沙巴 vs 雪兰莪FA 上半场 大/小 (香港盘) 大(0.5/1) @ 0.96
👍1
老赵✨9月2日足球精选 日联杯 ⏰17:30 队伍:万劳雷八户 vs 枥木市FC 推荐:万劳雷八户 +0/0.5 比分:1-1 2-1 日职联 ⏰18:00 队伍:大阪樱花 vs 柏太阳神 推荐:2-3球 比分:1-1 2-1 日职联 ⏰18:00 队伍:水户蜀葵 vs 鹿岛鹿角 推荐:鹿岛鹿角 -0.5/1 比分:0-1 1-2 1-3 日职联 ⏰18:00 队伍:町田泽维亚 vs 川崎前锋 推荐:全场大2.5/3 比分:2-1 3-1 日职联 ⏰18:00 队伍:长崎成功丸 vs 大阪钢巴 推荐:全场大2.5 比分:1-2 2-3 日职联 ⏰18:00 队伍:东京绿茵 vs 神户胜利船 推荐:神户胜利船 -0.5 比分:0-1 0-2 日职联 ⏰18:00 队伍:横滨水手 vs 京都不死鸟 推荐:横滨水手 -0.5 比分:2-1 3-0 日职联 ⏰18:00 队伍:千叶市原 v…
❤2😱2😁1
Signed TG1-yufu
Photo, posted without a caption
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_5598495916
Signed 极搜🔍资源搜索@JISOU
2026-09-02 01:30 奥地利甲组联赛 沃尔夫斯贝格 v 林茨 足球 让球 - 上半场 林茨 -0.5 2026-09-02 02:00 沙特超级联赛 希拉尔 v 阿尔艾利吉达 足球 让球 希拉尔 -1 2026-09-02 02:45 英格兰冠军联赛 斯旺西 v 沃特福德 足球 让球 斯旺西 -0.5 2026-09-02 02:45 英格兰冠军联赛 伯明翰 v 南安普敦 足球 让球 南安普敦 0 2026-09-02 02:45 英格兰冠军联赛 西汉姆联 v 狼队 足球 大 / 小 大 2.5 / 3
英格兰冠军联赛 林肯城 vs 布莱克本 (02/09 02:45) 大(2.5) @ 0.96 英格兰冠军联赛 朴茨茅斯 vs 德比郡 (02/09 02:45) 朴茨茅斯(-0.5) @ 1.00 英格兰冠军联赛 普雷斯顿 vs 布里斯托尔城 (02/09 02:45) 大(2.5) @ 0.88 英格兰冠军联赛 斯旺西 vs 沃特福德 (02/09 02:45) 大(2.5) @ 0.92 英格兰冠军联赛 谢菲尔德联 vs 博尔顿 (02/09 02:45) 谢菲尔德联(-1) @ 1.05 英格兰冠军联赛 西汉姆联 vs 狼队 (02/09 02:45) 西汉姆联(-0/0.5) @ 0.85 英格兰冠军联赛 伯明翰 vs 南安普敦 (02/09 03:00) 南安普敦(0) @ 0.87 英格兰冠军联赛 斯托克城 vs 诺维奇 (02/09 03:00) 大(2.5) @ 0.93 均注盈利 3串:沃特…
Showing the 12 most recent of 310 posts we hold for @TG408. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@eshwj · 2,46139 postsMK体育
@MK888bot · 10,93939 postsMK体育—飞投版: MK.BET
@MKFT777 · 2,54339 posts东南亚资讯|聚焦
@rdsjo · 16,85139 posts极搜🔍资源搜索@JISOU
@jisou2 · 1,814,56119 posts亚太导航频道
@dh555 · 7,03112 posts亚太国际-86.Net
@uu886bot · 10,61912 posts亚太国际→86.Net
@ytgj9999 · 33,29412 posts情绪稳定的交易员
@SU033 · 6,8951 post世界杯 欧洲杯 体育电竞赛事推荐
@TiYu9812 · 38,2001 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ccty005 · 29,507
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 5 September 2026
@tiyuquan · 101,943
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@dianjingtuidan1 · 91,698
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@JNTY999 · 56,813
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@duanzib · 91,250
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 August 2026
@tiyu_3 · 92,110
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 August 2026
@mltytxdy · 54,731
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
@ybgf9 · 29,498
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 2 September 2026
@ybtytd · 163,322
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@zuqiu8 · 35,908
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“世俱杯 世界杯 欧洲杯 体育滚球推单” (@TG408), 13,796 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TG408.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.