Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 曝光黑平台&黑佣金

Channel

曝光黑平台&黑佣金

@BG886

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,490subscribers

-4,490 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001835254716
TypeChannel
Username@BG886
Description🍉吃瓜: @BG888 💬东南亚交流 @ty888 ☎️投稿/曝光: @T3333 发财助手 © 2018-2026 祝商祺 🎉 #曝光 #吃瓜 #黑平台 #黑佣金 #不出款
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BG886

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 10 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 10 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@BG886/14895 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC@rdzx0/4468311 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC1.0052 minutes
@BG886/15005 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC@rdzx0/4521529 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC1.0013 minutes
@BG886/15055 · this entry4 Sept 2026, 01:36 UTC@rdzx0/454004 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC1.008.7 hours
@BG886/15155 · this entry19 Sept 2026, 04:45 UTC@rdzx0/4591019 Sept 2026, 08:25 UTC1.003.7 hours
@BG886/15238 · this entry27 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC@rdzx0/4623127 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC1.0037 minutes
@BG886/14856 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC@baoguang2022/578099 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC1.004 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@rdzx039 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.3 hoursthis entry (39–0)
@baoguang202228 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0025 hoursthis entry (28–0)
@baoguangba027 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0031 hoursthis entry (27–0)
@heicaibaog24 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 hoursthis entry (24–0)
@pzbgfabu66615 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0028 hoursthis entry (15–0)
@quanwangbaoguangb11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0021 hoursthis entry (11–0)
@BC21610 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0049 minutesthis entry (6–4)
@jrttbg8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.3 hoursthis entry (7–1)
@FMfengyg8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 daysthis entry (8–0)
@baoguang_qun5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0029 minutes@baoguang_qun (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 101 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 10 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @BG886 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 10 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

52,49056,98054,7357 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -4,490. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,817–57,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 15:4552,490-90
10 Nov 2026, 08:4952,580-117
8 Nov 2026, 22:1152,697-173
7 Nov 2026, 12:3652,870-101
6 Nov 2026, 12:1652,971-121
5 Nov 2026, 11:1953,092-92
4 Nov 2026, 07:5953,184-72
3 Nov 2026, 08:3953,256-72
2 Nov 2026, 10:2953,328-59
1 Nov 2026, 07:4653,387-97
31 Oct 2026, 05:3753,484-36
30 Oct 2026, 06:1053,520-64
29 Oct 2026, 05:2653,584-53
28 Oct 2026, 06:0053,637-28
27 Oct 2026, 09:1553,665-22
26 Oct 2026, 06:0653,687-13
25 Oct 2026, 09:1053,700-17
24 Oct 2026, 12:1753,717-19
23 Oct 2026, 14:5053,736-18
22 Oct 2026, 16:0653,754first reading

Engagement

131 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.275%
avg views ÷ 52,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
144
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.776%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 131 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held131 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total5,767
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 11:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈14,700
Videos
≈174
Links
≈596

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 07s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1376.5%
👍211.8%
🎉15.88%
👏15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 40 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 11:41 UTC102 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#333体育 #黑平台 拒付154万盈利并清零账户,怒曝黑幕 在 333体育 平台中赢得 154 万元,本应顺利提现,却被平台以“赔率错误”“非正常投注”为借口拒绝付款最后甚至直接将账户积分全部清零。 我所下的是冷门盘口,下注前已经向客服确认也完全按照平台提供的赔率和盘口正常投注。赔率和盘口均由平台自行设定,若真有错误,也应由平台承担责任,而不是把锅甩给玩家。 最终,平台只愿意象征性补偿十几万元,却拒绝支付剩余的巨额盈利,态度敷衍、毫无担当,完全是一副输不起的样子。 更让人愤怒的是,平台还声称这是对我的“特殊照顾”,否则一分都不会给,逻辑荒唐至极。 我在皇冠现金网稳定投注了五六年,自从 2021 年被 333体育收购后,平台风格彻底变了,对“老客户”毫无保障,只想着压榨玩家。 如果平台继续拒绝处理将持续曝光这个垃圾黑平台,提醒更多玩家保持警惕,避免被坑。

12 Nov 2026, 05:00 UTC103 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 #星海互娱 🚨 曝光!🇰🇭柬埔寨这边《星海互娱》失联,跑路了,平台,官方账号已删除,用户补贴款项去向成疑! 近日,多个用户反映,曾参与《星海互娱》平台的动态发布推广活动,但原本承诺发放的推广补贴迟迟未到账。 根据《星海互娱》于 2026年11月9日 发布的最后一份公告: 平台声称,由于财务部门 ABA 账户遭遇风控,导致资金出现问题,用户补贴可能延迟发放,预计于11月15日左右恢复。 公告还承诺: * 用户10月份已发布的动态天数可以保留,作为补贴证明。 * 用户可以选择暂停发布动态,等待至11月15日。 * 平台承诺不会少发、漏发用户应得的补贴。 * ABA账户恢复正常后,将第一时间发放补贴。 然而,令人担忧的是,截至目前,用户反映平台官方账号已经删除,原有公告之后也没有看到明确的后续处理说明。你推广佣金都舍不得发放,这种平台肯定是杀猪盘,跑路了,平台跑路了, ⚠️ 给参与用户,还有想玩平台的用户…

11 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC111 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#66U黑平台 #黑款2万U 66U黑台子,充值10000U提现20000U,直接被卡住,没有说任何理由,在线客服只会说审核部门正在审核,已经过去36个小时,客服爱理不理的,连本金都不给,在66U玩大的用户注意了,不用被骗了,赶快换个可靠台子, 66U.COM 认准黑台子!

11 Nov 2026, 02:43 UTC124 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#网友曝光 最近刚出的 #6C娱乐 和 #贵族娱乐。本人在两个平台均有娱乐充值。贵族开业没几天,现已无限期关门跑路。贵族原推广转投6C,解释称原本两家公司就是一家股东,后来又和好之类。我真是真金白银充值参加其自称的包赔活动,平台告知参加成功,期间多次询问何时赔付,客服依旧说3天后。直到包赔时,对方露出嘴脸,分文不赔,套路与贵族差不多,各种推脱不让你参加,借口说有关联、一分钱彩金未领取。参加了包赔却没赔,还说你套利,也不劝退,实际上一分彩金没安排,却让你背个套利的锅,本金自己拿着。现在这种没有上押担保、并且喜欢频繁更换名字各种合营的平台,大家擦亮眼睛吧。纯玩不起:贵族300+120,平台直接无限期关门歇业;6C卡100,送你们买鞭炮了,跨年的时候躺棺材里放!

10 Nov 2026, 11:57 UTC117 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#黑平台曝光 #66U黑平台 #黑款2万U 66U是原来西湖改为66U,充值10000U提款20000U,全部玩百家乐BBIN,一次下注5000U,分了两次赚了10000U,提款说要审核部门审核,这不妥妥的杀猪吗? 把玩家当猪宰,没想到这种环境还这样杀玩家,玩过这么多平台,这是最黑的一个。请大家一定避雷!黑平台网址:66U.COM 有在玩的一定要小心!!!

9 Nov 2026, 09:55 UTC119 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#网友曝光:上个星期刚黑了我109000u,刚开始小金额给下分,大分直接改掉会员的帐号密码,性质恶劣,已经在温暖大事件曝光过,现在又到处在频道打广告,请大家避雷黑台子,避免资金损失,还在玩的兄弟姐妹们,赶紧提领😊

8 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC137 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#网友曝光 官网 789.me 今天打电话给我,说是特邀爆率很高,然后我就进去存了100块,打到差不多还剩200准备下分,直接给我撤回提现,罚了我12倍流水。客服给的解释是注单异常,给我都整懵了。

8 Nov 2026, 06:19 UTC133 views0 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#网友曝光 #澳门新葡京 533.cc 这个平台现在是假平台,无缘无故冻结会员帐户,去找客服就说下注订单异常,就没有下文了,就说收到风控部门的通知,妈的,这个平台现在动不动就冻结账户,卡款,如果有同胞在这个平台玩的要注意踩雷

8 Nov 2026, 05:14 UTC132 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#网友爆料 #米兰体育 前前后后输了2个多月 输了 1万多 没提过款 第一次赢钱提款直接被拒 说我恶意刷流水 我就玩了一个体育串子单跟PG 流水够了 提款 直接被拒 现在经济不好5000都开始黑了 开云集团活不起了吗?

7 Nov 2026, 06:06 UTC117 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#网友曝光 #97彩世界 11月5日凌晨在97彩世界存款3.8w。中途打到了6w然后提了3w给了,后面输了就把三万存了上了打到了6.8w就不给了。前面是出款系统升级让我中午12点再提,中午12点我提现审核到下午六点然后显示失败让联系上级,上级就根本联系不到我去哪联系上级,后面我又输到了2.4w还是不给提款。只能输不能赢的黑台子,各位赌友避雷97彩世界,看见一定要远离

6 Nov 2026, 15:37 UTC117 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 #木森体育 木森体育黑网,大家避雷不要上当。 木森体育是鸭脖二代包网,充值4000提款3500,全部玩的体育流水一万多,提款说要验证要我银行卡存600,我存了,后面又说要验证需要再存1000,这不妥妥的杀猪吗?把玩家当猪宰,没想到这种环境还这样杀玩家,玩过这么多平台,这是最黑的一个。请大家一定避雷!!!

6 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#6T平台 #代理佣金 #佣金结算 曝光6T平台!代理辛苦推广两个月,佣金却被拒绝发放,连基础35%都不给结算? 今天我决定公开自己的真实经历,希望更多正在6T平台做推广的代理能够看到,也希望平台能够正面回应我的问题。 本人在6T平台做代理推广,前前后后辛辛苦苦做了两个多月,投入了大量时间、精力和资源。 期间,我一直认真维护代理线、发展会员,努力完成平台要求的推广工作。 但是到了佣金结算的时候,却遇到了让我无法理解的问题。 第一个问题:上个月能正常发放,这个月为什么连佣金都不给发? 根据之前的结算情况,上个月平台曾经给我发放过打码奖励和人头费。 但是到了这个月,佣金却无法正常发放。 我多次询问原因,得到的回复始终是审核部门不通过,以审核结果为准。 我想知道,同样是做代理推广,为什么上个月可以结算,这个月却连基本佣金都无法发放? 第二个问题:55%可以不要,为什么连35%的基础佣金也不给? 沟通过程中,我已经…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @BG886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

东南亚沸点Time🥇
@vip35r · 22,851
#1
安危事件
@anwei2 · 31,826
#2
新华社丨新闻曝光
@iiiik · 33,373
#3
heicaibaog
@heicaibaog · 10
#4
东南亚新闻|斑马曝光|news
@Banma_xinwen · 84,124
#5
菲律宾华人事件
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 13,872
#6
海外头条-海外新闻-cctv
@aza520 · 3,236
#7
东南亚吃瓜🍉
@dny1577 · 5,000
#8
中文安危曝光🌸海外华人日记
@tghuarenba · 33,729
#9
东南亚头条吃瓜
@svipzz · 56,553
#10
大象曝光|新闻
@dxdb001 · 4,720
#11
东南亚大事件/头条事件
@toutiao_4 · 1,076
#12
最前线大事件曝光
@cctv_dy · 21,774
#13
博度-东南亚曝光新闻
@bodu08 · 55,734
#14
华人大事件-吃瓜新闻
@baoguang821 · 45,718
#15
柬埔寨头条事件️🅥
@HR8877 · 315,303
#16
博彩新闻/今日头条/东南亚新闻
@xinhuaribao · 902
#17
全网曝光|东南亚日记
@bbb1b · 307,244
#18
迪拜新闻|华人资讯大曝光
@xinwen118 · 123,053
#19
新闻早班车🐾
@tg04277 · 53,580
#20
东南亚新闻💎
@vipn8888 · 58,129
#21
博彩黑台曝光
@baoguang_bc · 12,073
#22
东南亚🌍安危大事件 (💋菲 柬 迪 泰 缅 老挝💋)爆料
@quanqiubaoliao · 215,602
#23
菲律宾新闻|华人资讯曝光|philippine news
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 67,906
#24
狗仔爆料_吃瓜爆光新闻大事件
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,017
#25
博彩曝光【菲行者】菲律宾新闻/黑台曝光/东南亚大事件❤️❤️
@feixingzhe0 · 46,092
#26
东南亚曝光台☎️
@DNYBG234 · 87,172
#27
东南亚曝光吧⚠️吃瓜爆料
@baoguangba088 · 231,965
#28
菲律宾华人事件
@svip40 · 129,420
#29
东南亚头条曝光㊖
@bg888 · 308,230
#30
东南亚BC热点新闻
@baoguangqun110 · 68,764
#31
吃瓜新闻大曝光
@jiuboo · 13,944
#32
东南亚曝光吧(吃瓜)
@SB919 · 118,751
#33
菲律宾大事件灰产新闻/曝光
@tg89aa · 115,500
#34
东南亚新闻大事件
@bvl222 · 43,236
#35
菲律宾头条爆料(Bole新闻)
@phnews · 17,003
#36
东南亚🇨🇿今日头条
@huohu158 · 176,294
#37
新闻资讯
@BG_BG8 · 32,534
#38
东南亚曝光/大事件
@dny099 · 197,366
#39
东南亚 曝光 悬赏 新闻
@DNYXW008 · 73,371
#40
博彩大事件-曝光
@dsj0161 · 1,975
#41
菲律宾新闻频道
@baoguangqun999 · 67,610
#42
🇨🇳华人社东南亚大事件
@hrs166 · 37,772
#43
斯里兰卡头条新闻曝光
@baoguangee · 198,442
#44
Makati新闻社
@makatinews · 67,596
#45
东南亚华人大事件
@jsj62 · 21,871
#46
迪拜新闻|东南亚大事件|曝光群
@baoguang032 · 28,550
#47
东南亚头条曝光频道(菲龙网)
@bgxinwen200 · 26,245
#48
全网曝光
@rjjjj · 34,989
#49
柬埔寨大事件|曝光|新闻|西港|金边|吃瓜
@v3903 · 33,450
#50
东南亚今日头条.
@mbhl1 · 2,608
#51
迪拜新闻|华人资讯曝光|dubai news
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 64,320
#52
东南亚曝光黑平台灰产绑架吃瓜
@TGPG999 · 4,552
#53
东南亚大事件·news channel
@gejige · 162,019
#54
赌狗社市场交流大会
@baoguang008 · 3,510 (as read 23 August 2026)
#55
今日全网曝光频道
@bg855 · 332,331
#56
华人第一资讯(78.com 独家冠名)
@Dzx199 · 26,141
#57
《今日新闻》
@cctvPH · 130,613
#58
柬埔寨西港曝光吃瓜新闻
@kaleminews · 173,674
#59
东南亚曝光频道
@BG2288 · 119,397
#60

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

博彩曝光【菲行者】菲律宾新闻/黑台曝光/东南亚大事件❤️❤️
@feixingzhe0 · 46,092
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
东南亚新闻大事件
@bvl222 · 43,236
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
东南亚曝光台☎️
@DNYBG234 · 87,172
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
heicaibaog
@heicaibaog · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
曝光|新闻|大事件
@TGBG8888 · 82,084
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
东南亚曝光频道
@BG2288 · 119,397
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
东南亚新闻|斑马曝光|news
@Banma_xinwen · 84,124
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
博度-东南亚曝光新闻
@bodu08 · 55,734
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
博彩社区-平台爆光
@bocaishen8 · 93,483
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
迪拜新闻|华人资讯大曝光
@xinwen118 · 123,053
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
最前线大事件曝光
@cctv_dy · 21,774
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
东南亚🇨🇿今日头条
@huohu158 · 176,294
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
菲律宾大事件灰产新闻/曝光
@tg89aa · 115,500
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
曝光骗子
@baoguang2022 · 134,858
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
东南亚曝光/大事件
@dny099 · 197,366
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
吃瓜东南亚头条㊖
@CG887 · 95,250
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
头条快报
@ttkb0 · 103,639
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
华人大事件-吃瓜新闻
@baoguang821 · 45,718
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
东南亚新闻💎
@vipn8888 · 58,129
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
菲律宾今日新闻|海豹资讯曝光|philippine news
@baoguang_123 · 162,602
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
菲律宾/头条事件/曝光
@vjtyd · 53,495
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 August 2026
博彩黑平台曝光🔍
@uuuuuf · 166,388
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
🥇东南亚华人大事件
@DNY88880 · 100,841
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 August 2026
菲律宾大事件 全球曝光🚀
@feilvbin198 · 79,701
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“曝光黑平台&黑佣金” (@BG886), 52,490 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BG886.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.