👀 柬埔寨|马来西亚|菲律宾|泰国|越南 烟 · 酒 · 茶|名表 · 名包 · 珠宝|实体门店 😍多国实体门店 · 线下经营 😍 酒庄批发配送,精品烟酒 😍 精选茶叶,高品质茶品 😍名表 · 名包 · 珠宝回收 😍黄金 · 名表 · 奢侈品回收及典当 🐋免费上门估价 🐤快速服务 · 价格合理 🍈 全程保密 · 安全可靠 🌍业务众多 · 长期合作 🦧覆盖多个东南亚地区,实体门店服务更安心! 😍Telegram:@x_ovo 欢迎咨询|长期合作|诚邀代理与商务合作

Channel
今日聚焦曝光
@a0159
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
94,227subscribers
-25,376 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001984195455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @a0159 @baoguang1580 @db408 @dj9x9 @dny2x @jbz05 @mianbei15 @miandian24 @tgbgi @toutiao19 |
| Description | 🔈 欢迎关注【今日聚焦】 🔍 #新闻分享 #黑平台 #黑公司 #骗子 等真实传媒中心 今日聚焦频道专注于:全网华人的最新动态资讯,生活事件分享,全网海外华人求助,让你阅遍全网海外华人大小事件。 ✉️全网曝光投稿: @ceont 🔥广告业务合作 联系商务: @ceont |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 541 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/a0159 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 15:56 | 94,227 | -53 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 14:38 | 94,280 | -19 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 94,299 | +4,177 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:50 | 90,122 | +262 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:35 | 89,860 | +983 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 05:21 | 88,877 | -230 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 02:28 | 89,107 | no change |
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:50 | 89,107 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 23:56 | 89,107 | -252 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 19:20 | 89,359 | +4,081 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 01:46 | 85,278 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 01:45 | 85,278 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 00:56 | 85,278 | -915 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:19 | 86,193 | no change |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:20 | 86,193 | no change |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:01 | 86,193 | no change |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:41 | 86,193 | -567 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 86,760 | no change |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:18 | 86,760 | no change |
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 86,760 | first reading |
Engagement
1,620 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.07%
- avg views ÷ 94,227 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,780
- 461 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.418%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 461
- of 1,620 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 345 of 461 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,620 (10 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,203,988 |
| Reactions total | 4,483 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 04:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈73,300
- Videos
- ≈7,710
- Links
- ≈20,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 48m
- Average length
- 39s
Measured directly from 258 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,275 reactions across 775 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1,169 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 1,140 | 10.1% | |
| custom 6089238167926349254 | 1,053 | 9.34% | |
| ⚡ | 1,031 | 9.14% | |
| 🥰 | 992 | 8.80% | |
| 😁 | 951 | 8.43% | |
| 🤩 | 895 | 7.94% | |
| 🎉 | 845 | 7.49% | |
| 👏 | 792 | 7.02% | |
| custom 6088993290365969106 | 457 | 4.05% | |
| custom 6336855560960351167 | 455 | 4.04% | |
| custom 6089143880509300614 | 277 | 2.46% | |
| custom 6337049066416906545 | 264 | 2.34% | |
| 🤡 | 214 | 1.90% | |
| 🙉 | 186 | 1.65% | |
| 🦄 | 179 | 1.59% | |
| 👾 | 177 | 1.57% | |
| ❤ | 105 | 0.931% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 0.204% | |
| 👀 | 15 | 0.133% | |
| 16 further kinds | 55 | 0.488% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 775 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,275 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 44
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 42
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 4%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @a0159. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 74 of 461 posts held from the last 30 days (16.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#黑平台曝光 #黑平台 #网友投稿 #T1体育 本人在T1体育账号:a2190196首存一千,提现2343账户被清空余额冻结账号。 客服送了68彩金,我打了5500流水百家乐pg电子足球都玩,提现8个小时后账号被清空余额并且冻结账号,问了代理得到的回复说我体育按进球点下注以及百家乐对打,首先我要申明,体育一共就买了两单,葡萄牙u23上半场买了全场大3直到下半场67分钟才进第二球结果这单还是输的,第二单开场第1分钟买了角球大4.5直到23分钟才来第一个角球,根本不存在进球点下注。百家乐对打就更不现实了,我对打的意义在哪?能赢钱吗?首存一千打了5500流水我为什么还要去对打百家乐。再此奉劝各位老哥,我也是才知道这个T1体育出了名的杀猪盘,赢钱就以进球点下注等理由说你违规并且清空余额,连充值的钱都不退给你,妥妥的杀猪盘。 ⭐ 订阅今日聚焦曝光:@dny2x ⭐ 投稿爆料商务合作:@ceont
🌭1🙉1custom 60892381679263492541
早批遣送回国的电诈专员出狱了 🌻 #网友投稿 大前天刚从监狱里面把我刑满释放的老弟接回来了,他之前是在柬埔寨网络诈骗公司里面上班的电诈专员。他们这一批早在2025年上半年就被柬埔寨政府军警打掉抓走的人,然后在2025年7-8月份陆续遣送回国判刑坐牢。 我老弟和大部分人都只是诈骗公司的小喽啰甚至可能是被骗去的受害者,所以判刑时间不长大多是1-3年之间,我老弟被判了1年零2个月加上他是个穷逼没有钱就没有缴纳太多的退赃和罚款。 他们这一批在国外从事电诈回来坐牢的小喽啰大部分也已经出狱了,他们里面有人再想正常拿着护照出国是不可能的,至少在5-10年内警方会限制他们出国再做违法犯罪的事情祸害人。 亲戚朋友都嘲笑我老弟是个没脑子的🐷头,没出国做电诈的时候本身就穷,出国做电诈之后又穷又苦还分别在诈骗公司和监狱里面挨过毒打虐待,自作孽不可活!我老弟认识一些他的同行是在2026年之后从东南亚多地抓回国判刑的,这批人回国判刑的时间基本上都比…
🥰6custom 60892381679263492546🌭2custom 63368555609603511671
#网友投稿:老挝金三角特外,最近会迎来联合执法,会塞和别的地区已经来了很多警察了,特外暂时停工撤离了,暂时是待不了。 ⭐ 订阅今日聚焦曝光:@dny2x ⭐ 投稿爆料商务合作:@ceont
🤩4⚡3😁3🎉2🔥2
#网友投稿 防止突袭 我们从缅甸大其力山区搬家到孟东镇边角上有一个多星期了,这次搬家后估计以后都不会再搬回大其力。 从保护我们的缅军内部人员传出消息,本月开始中国政府那边已经严肃的下来指令要求缅甸大其力全面配合整治打击残留在这里的电诈产业。 只要是从事有关中国人的电诈一律打击绝不姑息,不管他是缅甸佬泰国人还是越南人发现后都要先逮捕起来再做处罚,性质恶劣的还会被引渡去中国国内审判。 这是要再次警示那些依然在开中国电诈盘的外国人,不要以为是外国人中国政府就束手无策。看看之前的缅甸四大诈骗家族领导掌门人,引渡去中国审判后不说各个都会安排上死刑,但牢底坐穿直到变成骨灰还是可刑的。 保护我们公司的缅军士兵可能懵懂无知但他们的军官还是有些害怕,但又不想丢了电诈这块摇钱树大产业,那只能是搬家搬远些再躲好。搬家后看见有保护我们的缅军这次连肩扛式导弹RPG都带上了,那可不是拿着RPG用来吓唬公司员工不要逃跑的。 孟东这个地方现在依然有爆…
😁6🥰5🔥3
#群友投稿:从11月1号开始,马来西亚海关、移民局系统,180天周期严格管控,重点查停留超90天的。 今天我过来接几个老乡,其中两个是我这边帮买了机票,过来办手续的。但他们同行另外两个人,入境之后已经超过90天了。现在想走自助通道刷不过,没法正常出境。 现在马来西亚对于180天内停留90天这个规则查得特别严,大家一定要留意,超期的直接卡着出不去! ⭐ 订阅今日聚焦曝光:@dny2x ⭐ 投稿爆料商务合作:@ceont
🥰8🎉2😁2
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀九博官方频道: 👉@JBGJ 😀九博官方开奖: 👉@KJ28 😀九博上下分群: 👉@jiubovip 😀九博国际主营: ⚡️😀😀😀 ⚡️ 😀😀⚡️😀😀⚡️😀😀⚡️😀😀⚡️😀😀❤️😀😀 加拿大PC 2.0 / 2.8、网盘、满赔等多种玩法! 单注限红 😀😀W!单期最高赔付高达 😀😀W ! 玩法超乎想象,赔付打破上限,有胆你就来,下注即巅峰! ♾ PC 2.0 【实时反水1万反250】 ♾ PC 2.8 【超高赔率6.4倍】 ♾网盘pc【和值13/14正常结算】 ♾ 满赔 PC 【组合赔率高达4.73倍】 ♾ 满赔网盘pc【13/14正常赔付】 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🏦钱包验资: @kpay 💁♀️官方客服: @J111~@J888 💁♀️官方财务: @j444~@j666
😜出抖音手机版: 🗑满月辅助实名白 设备干净无需挂 IP上 📱国卡当天实名 白 无视 IP 包秒死 包48小时掉实名 包永久不找回 接码一个月 一号一链接 📱国卡私人1-12个月递推实名抖音 无视ip 包秒死 包永久不找回 可上pc网页版 📱国卡私人实名千粉3000-5000粉丝可网页 📱国卡私人实名万粉抖音可上手机 网页版 pc 包登陆 包秒死 帮忙改资料 发作品 接码1200元 📖单太📖双太📖三太 📖皇冠 可挑选账号 不弹窗 加人不过滤 📱快手系列📱小红书系列😏钉钉系列 😏钉钉售后 包秒死10分钟 包永久不找回 登录方式邮箱号➕密码接码直登 可代上云机 可直登手机 🀄️探探注册号🀄️探探月号🀄️探探年号 🉑代充探探币 🉑代开会员 🀄️可代充陌陌币 可代开会员 陌陌售后包登陆 秒死10分钟 可以解封 📱微博系列 📱微博白号大量现货📱📱 📱信用分420-499 3年以上老号 📱信用分500-569 3…
#群友爆料:图片此人早期盘踞柬埔寨从事军包诈骗、美国华侨诈骗,担任公司总负责人、大代理、主管等多种职务。 吉米(戴眼镜、一头白毛,福建漳州籍);公司老板:托尼,之前听说改名老K(福建漳州籍),长期在马来遥控操作指挥。 公司代理有:张帅、阿浩、大山、老游、阿财、小猪、阿进、阿东。 后台管理:阿浩、天赐、小凯。 集团大老板:三证集团老蒋(福建漳州籍)旗下分公司。 最开始军包公司在缅甸佤邦,后面因为缅甸严打,搬家到柬埔寨木牌园区,分为多个部门诈骗。每个月军包公司一个部门业绩至少3000万人民币打底,美国华侨公司业绩每个月至少2000万打底。 后面因为木牌出事后待不下去,搬家到财通5A园区和金湾园区继续从事诈骗。在财通5A园区,一名国内骗过来的小孩子因为数据不达标,被吉米、主管、组长以及其他的员工活活殴打致死。最后整个公司都被警察包围,公司搬家走到七星海园区。 到七星海园区也是无恶不作,导致很多国内骗招过来的小孩每天强制要…
🤩12
#网友曝光:此人自称是陕西西安人,真名张宇龙,长期以各种理由向他人索要路费。据其本人所述,家里催得紧,急需还债。去年曾在柬埔寨从事诈骗相关活动,后来因当地清扫行动返回国内。上个月,经朋友介绍认识此人。他表示想出来,但手头没钱,于是我出于信任,帮他购买了前往马来西亚的机票。随后,他又以入境需要验资为由,让我转钱给他兑换。钱转过去、兑换完成后,他竟然在网上找了一张照片,谎称自己已经登机。等到后来抵达马来西亚,我联系他时,他却开始失联。再次询问,他给出的理由竟然是出去喝酒、按摩了。之后,我还帮他办理好了签证,没想到他又开始装疯卖傻,弄个小号说国内警方联系他,让他报备行程试图再次骗钱,图三是上个月的照片,图一是他现在的照片,时隔一个月,吃的挺好的啊,不少骗吧,吃的油光满面的,劝诫各大同行,如果接人看到这个人,请不要相信他的鬼话 ⭐ 订阅今日聚焦曝光:@dny2x ⭐ 投稿爆料商务合作:@ceont
🤩4😁4🔥3🎉2
#网友分享:兄弟们,发这篇帖子没别的原因,就是用我自己的血泪教训给大家敲个警钟。 在国外,千万别精虫上脑,一时的放纵,可能会让你付出惨痛的代价。 上个月,因为工作和度假,我去了趟菲律宾马尼拉。那边的夜生活确实热闹,社交软件上打招呼的妹子也特别多。说实话,身处异国他乡,周围充斥着那种荷尔蒙爆发的氛围,人很容易放松警惕。 后来,在软件上认识了一个菲律宾本地的女生,长得很甜,身材也很好,聊天特别热情、主动。出来喝了几次酒,气氛烘托到那了,当晚就顺理成章地回了酒店。当时她表现得很温柔,也一直说自己很“干净”。由于精虫上脑,加上海风一吹,我脑子一热,在关键时刻没有做全防护措施。这就是我噩梦的开始。 回国后大概一个星期左右,我开始觉得身体不对劲。起初是私密部位有些发痒、灼热,我以为只是水土不服,或者天气太热,有些发炎。结果到了第十天,症状开始加重,甚至出现了明显的溃疡和分泌物。 当时我整个人都懵了,心里防线彻底崩溃。那种恐惧和焦虑…
🤩8👍2🔥2🎉1🤡1custom 63368555609603511671
#网友曝光:李宝辉(外号小K) 心狠手辣 在木姐和芭提雅涉嫌杀人。k总是什么都能做,五毒俱全啊,还是一样的心狠手辣,芭提雅k总10几套别墅,被干掉一个,后面的应该也快了。 老天爷要开始收你的命了,你要为那些冤魂偿命了,目前用缅甸护照进出泰国,呼吁泰国警方要求那些被捕的手下指证杀人魔王,大盘K总,抓捕遣送中国。 ⭐ 订阅今日聚焦曝光:@dny2x ⭐ 投稿爆料商务合作:@ceont
🔥6👍5🤩4😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,620 posts we hold for @a0159. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@a0159 edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 6 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 11 November 2026
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@simidanganshi · 6,54757 posts2028122.COM- 2028体育官方频道
@pg115 · 15,11247 posts九博国际 · 公群导航
@jbgj · 18,62346 posts🏆九博国际@JBGJ🏆上下分群 总押900万美金
@jiubovip · 8,67846 posts182280.COM- 182体育官方频道
@VIP182PG · 7,68637 posts【2028126.com】赌王之王
@pgdzr · 6,00832 postsY3384.com- Y3国际官方频道
@y3vipnb · 4,18022 posts一元云购 · VIP交流群
@yyygjlq · 5,05522 posts一元云购 · 官方导航
@yyygpd · 6,93322 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 31,48721 posts182体育官方频道
@ty182gf · 4,48920 posts8G.com
@tg8g · 17,34319 postsN1娱乐城-赌王之王
@N1YLC8 · 4,92217 posts8k3008.com- 8K国际官方频道
@vip8k66 · 3,77013 posts🌐 000 体育-官方频道
@ty000 · 21411 postsN1118.COM- N1国际官方频道
@pg100 · 1,3304 posts全网搞笑吃瓜猎奇
@chiguagaoxiao58 · 72,2572 posts头条事件
@toutiaoshijian · 66,7252 posts今日全网曝光频道
@bg855 · 2,7361 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@a0159 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026 · confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vip35r · 23,635#1
@iiiik · 33,502#2
@cctv_dy · 22,052#3
@dny1577 · 5,024#4
@heicaibaog · 10#5
@jinritoutiao6 · 11,791#6
@dashijian01 · 22,266#7
@anwei2 · 32,247#8
@kaleminews · 177,158#9
@tghuarenba · 23,701#10
@svipzz · 58,665#11
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 14,475#12
@aza520 · 3,236#13
@Banma_xinwen · 84,367#14
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,093#15
@toutiao_4 · 1,076#16
@xinhuaribao · 902#17
@baoguangqun110 · 68,894#18
@vipn8888 · 57,986#19
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 68,095#20
@xinwen118 · 122,291#21
@BG_BG8 · 32,550#22
@bodu08 · 55,955#23
@baoguang821 · 45,398#24
@baoguangqun999 · 67,847#25
@DB405 · 42,925#26
@bgxinwen200 · 26,372#27
@tg89aa · 116,061#28
@ttkb0 · 94,077#29
@baoguangba088 · 233,862#30
@dxdb001 · 4,720#31
@huohu158 · 179,866#32
@tg04277 · 55,896#33
@dny099 · 199,535#34
@hrs166 · 37,810#35
@quanqiubaoliao · 193,543#36
@nnccqq · 37,485#37
@dongnanya108 · 109,257#38
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,042#39
@dnyawtt · 47,602#40
@BG423 · 25,553#41
@makatinews · 67,616#42
@dyy83 · 124,683#43
@bbb1b · 308,485#44
@dnyxst · 68,943#45
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 64,604#46
@woaiui · 8,092#47
@gejige · 164,915#48
@Cambodia15 · 56,246#49
@ydttbg1 · 28,956#50
@TGPG999 · 4,558#51
@bg855 · 2,736#52
@dsj0161 · 1,980#53
@flwph66 · 230,765#54
@jrttbg · 108,008#55
@rjjjj · 35,050#56
@baoguang211 · 8,202#57
@sii76 · 200,896#58
@Huichanquan588 · 435#59
@laowohuarenzixun · 68,231#60
@flbhuarenquan · 75,391#61
@mbhl1 · 2,608#62
@xinwenTV5 · 6,653#63
@fei3131 · 31,143#64
@baoguangee · 198,457#65
@chadnag001 · 25,228#66
@feilibingFBI · 6,875#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nx123 · 746,442
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
@dyy83 · 124,683
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
@ttkb0 · 94,077
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
@dsj665 · 116,519
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@hyxw3 · 60,200
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
@PHDA15 · 89,732
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguangb · 127,093
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@iiiik · 33,502
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
@dnyqqbj · 91,814
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
@rjjjj · 35,050
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
@heicaibaog · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
@dnyxst · 68,943
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
@dnyuuu88 · 122,976
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@hyxw6 · 75,731
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@laowohuarenzixun · 68,231
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
@taiguohuarenzixun · 72,422
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@AQzx_2 · 74,679
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 August 2026
@bgtjt · 106,711
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 August 2026
@bg99599 · 25
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 August 2026
@xinwenhc · 177,038
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@huohu158 · 179,866
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@baoguang2022 · 128,797
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
@gejige · 164,915
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026
@pzbgfabu666 · 281,374
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“今日聚焦曝光” (@a0159), 94,227 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/a0159.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.