#马来西亚新闻 【前 Tabung Haji 高管再面控,涉嫌收受 8882 令吉装修贿赂】 并沿用 5 万令吉保释金及相关保释条件,辩方没有异议,法官批准该申请。
❤1

Channel
@DNYXW008
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
79,700subscribers
-71,980 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001559444932 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DNYXW008 |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 #迪拜 热门曝光、新闻频道,安危事件, 曝光爆料,悬赏找人,东南亚必备的信息频道 Hot exposure, news channel, safety incidents, exposure and revelations, reward for finding people, a must-have exposure channel in Southeast Asia 商务合作: @HHBL_Z 投稿爆料: @tang1998 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DNYXW008 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 8 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @bxc888/498117 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC | @DNYXW008/64981 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bxc888/498167 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC | @DNYXW008/64985 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bxc888/498187 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC | @DNYXW008/64986 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bxc888/498207 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC | @DNYXW008/64987 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bxc888/498267 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC | @DNYXW008/64991 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @bxc888/498327 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC | @DNYXW008/64994 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @bxc888 | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (13–0) |
| @gtkx1 | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3.4 hours | @gtkx1 (8–0) |
| @haixiashibao1 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.9 hours | @haixiashibao1 (5–0) |
| @hxsbl | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.9 hours | @hxsbl (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 18 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 25 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @gtkx1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 79,700 | -6,505 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 86,205 | -1,865 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 88,070 | -1,986 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 90,056 | -4,470 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 94,526 | -1,976 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 96,502 | -3,466 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 99,968 | -5,035 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 105,003 | -2,189 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 107,192 | -1,795 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 108,987 | -1,911 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 110,898 | -760 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 111,658 | -1,422 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 113,080 | -1,167 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 114,247 | -2,096 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 116,343 | -2,044 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 118,387 | -4,674 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 123,061 | -1,352 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 124,413 | -2,000 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 126,413 | -3,897 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 130,310 | first reading |
674 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 368 of 424 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 674 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 277,738 |
| Reactions total | 1,037 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 00:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 78 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,239 reactions across 512 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 161 | 13.0% | |
| 🔥 | 138 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 135 | 10.9% | |
| 👏 | 128 | 10.3% | |
| 🥰 | 94 | 7.59% | |
| 😁 | 92 | 7.43% | |
| 🎉 | 84 | 6.78% | |
| 🤩 | 83 | 6.70% | |
| ⚡ | 77 | 6.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 52 | 4.20% | |
| 🍌 | 46 | 3.71% | |
| 👌 | 46 | 3.71% | |
| 💔 | 45 | 3.63% | |
| 👎 | 42 | 3.39% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 0.646% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 0.484% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.161% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 513 of the 674 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 674 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#马来西亚新闻 【前 Tabung Haji 高管再面控,涉嫌收受 8882 令吉装修贿赂】 并沿用 5 万令吉保释金及相关保释条件,辩方没有异议,法官批准该申请。
❤1
巴域32间出租屋被查,5处窝点涉电诈被查封 9月25日,柴桢省巴域市统一指挥力量在副省长孟恩的带领下,对巴域市32间出租排屋展开行政检查。 执法人员共发现35名外籍人员(含4名女性),涉及越南、中国、缅甸三国。 检查中,警方在5处出租屋内查获大量电子设备,包括电脑、手机及Wi-Fi设备等,发现涉嫌网络诈骗的证据。 目前,所有嫌疑人和物证已移交柴桢省警察局反技术犯罪办公室,涉案场所已被暂时查封,案件正在依法处理中。
👏1
#菲律宾新闻 【马科斯签署法案,推迟描笼涯与青年议会选举,村级官员任期延长至五年】 但该法案也引来部分反对声音,担忧任期拉长会降低基层官员问责力度。
👌1
#马来西亚新闻 【柔佛笨珍跨部门联合行动取缔毒驾,五人尿检阳性遭逮捕并开出75张交通违例单】 一共开出75张违例通知书。当局表示将持续推进跨部门协作,严打毒驾行为,保障道路使用者出行安全。
❤🔥1👏1
#泰国新闻 【泰国警方连破两大跨省贩毒大案,合计查获冰毒 519 公斤,打掉毒品分销链条】 持续向上追查上游货源、中转渠道以及幕后核心人员,进一步扩大案件侦办成果。
❤🔥1
#开心一笑:今天刚下班回宿舍,结果发现舍友在做这不可描述的动作,需求这么大,不找个男朋友吗。 PS:姐妹与你心连心,你把姐妹挂网上🤣
❤1💔1
著名音乐家刘欢病逝,享年63岁 对外经济贸易大学退休教师、著名音乐家刘欢,于2026年9月25日在上海病逝,享年63岁。 刘欢1963年出生于天津,1991年起在对外经济贸易大学任教,2023年退休,曾为该校创作校歌《UIBE之歌》。 遵照刘欢生前遗愿,丧事从简,不举行遗体告别仪式和追悼会。 ps:一代人的熟悉歌声停下了,但那些经典作品还会一直被人记住。刘欢老师一路走好。
❤1
#网友反馈 刚刚在 🇻🇳越南3郡发生的事情,还是要提醒各位老板,去越南一定要低调点。越南仔脾气真的爆,隔三差五都是干仗。
⚡1❤🔥1🔥1
#泰国新闻 【曼谷启动 Safe BKK 90 天扫毒行动,市长带队进社区清查,累计查获巨额毒品与 253 亿泰铢涉毒资产】 相关部门强调,90 天专项计划结束后,禁毒清查不会中断,将常态化持续开展,稳固社区治安。
💔1🔥1
柬埔寨人也被诈骗了2620万美元 在刚刚结束的打击网络诈骗国际会议上,柬埔寨国家警察总署总监苏通透露,网赌电诈不仅导致外籍人员受害,柬埔寨本国国民在2025年及2026年前8个月内亦受骗损失约2,620万美元。 数据显示,2025年柬埔寨警方共接到1,136起本国公民的报案(损失约470万美元),仅解决51起;2026年前8个月接报1,084起(损失约2,150万美元),仅解决42起。 苏通指出,打击跨国诈骗存在诸多挑战:技术与资金流追查难度大、公众防范意识薄弱、未能铲除潜伏海外的幕后主使,以及涉案人员证件过期导致遣返滞后与财政负担加重。为此,他呼吁国际社会加强跨国合作,共同阻断犯罪链条。
👌1
泰缅边境两起中国公民绑架案,作案路线均指向同一地点“Deko Park” 泰国媒体梳理发现,两起涉及中国公民的绑架案件,跨境转运路线高度相似,犯罪链条存在多处重合。 据消息人士称,该园区内大约关押着上千名来自不同国家和地区的人员。不过园区的实际规模,以及两起绑架案件是否属于同一犯罪团伙所为,目前仍待泰缅两国警方进一步调查确认
❤🔥1😁1
#柬埔寨反诈 #太子集团 #网络安全 柬埔寨锁定诈骗主脑,太子集团调查扩大 柬埔寨正重拳打击网络诈骗!国务高级部长蔡西那烈在金边全球反诈骗大会上透露,当局已锁定大型诈骗集团的幕后主脑及保护伞,但搜证需要时间。他强调国际合作至关重要,过早公开细节可能导致嫌犯潜逃。此次大会汇聚了美中等多国代表,共同商讨对策。 自疫情后,东南亚沦为诈骗重灾区,受害者遭贩运并被迫从事网诈。美方估算,仅2024年东南亚园区就从美国人手中骗走100亿美元。虽然柬方称已瓦解境内大型园区,但分析人士质疑其完整性。TRM Labs分析师指出,许多大园区仍在运作,背后的科技、支付和洗钱网络依然活跃。 与此同时,对“太子集团”的调查正在扩大。该集团被指为数十亿诈骗洗钱的幌子,创办人陈志已被遣返中国。金边郊外两个疑似太子集团据点曾容纳数千人,甚至设有假冒新加坡警局设施用于行骗。
👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 674 posts we hold for @DNYXW008. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 98 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚 曝光 悬赏 新闻” (@DNYXW008), 79,700 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNYXW008.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.