#122体育❗️巨额出款无忧❗️ 📛😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 😀😳😳 😀😀😀😀 👌👌👌USDT存出款,不限IP 提款无上限! PG电子🔔百家乐各大真人视讯 0风控 ❗️0审核 ❗️包出款 不管多大额都给你出款的才牛逼 除了出款稳、其他一无是处!!! 🆘硬核福利🆘❗️ 💎充1000 送300📌 💎充3000送500📌 🔔福利频道: @PG1814 ♾ ✅客服专员: @xixiwct 🥹 ✅注册网址: 1221991.com ✅
👍1

Channel
@chiguahs
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
107,687subscribers
-4,880 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001667435460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chiguahs |
| Description | 商业合作: @daouy1 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chiguahs |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 49 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @chiguahs/117058 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC | @TGBG01/589206 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC | 1.00 | 2.3 hours |
| @TGBG01/589367 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC | @chiguahs/117312 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @TGBG01/589417 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC | @chiguahs/117311 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @TGBG01/591349 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC | @chiguahs/117313 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC | 1.00 | 25 hours |
| @chiguahs/117442 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC | @TGBG01/5933311 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC | 1.00 | 25 hours |
| @TGBG01/5995119 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC | @chiguahs/118446 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC | 1.00 | 23 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @TGBG01 | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 25 hours | @TGBG01 (6–4) |
| @wenanhs1 | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 days | @wenanhs1 (8–1) |
| @gaoxiaochigua8 | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 26 minutes | @gaoxiaochigua8 (6–1) |
| @Chiguapindaoo | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 13 hours | this entry (5–0) |
| @sucaihs | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4.0 hours | this entry (3–2) |
| @meishisc | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4.2 hours | @meishisc (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 20 of the 20 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 340 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 49 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @J9yaya. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 49 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 06:50 | 107,687 | -467 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 19:50 | 108,154 | -458 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:35 | 108,612 | -454 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:37 | 109,066 | -154 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:34 | 109,220 | -264 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:27 | 109,484 | -307 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:08 | 109,791 | +1,686 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:16 | 108,105 | -80 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:20 | 108,185 | -368 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 108,553 | -506 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:29 | 109,059 | -510 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:08 | 109,569 | -400 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 109,969 | -490 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 110,459 | -374 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 110,833 | -536 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:55 | 111,369 | -205 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 111,574 | -525 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 112,099 | +1,608 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:11 | 110,491 | -466 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:38 | 110,957 | first reading |
914 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 145 of 291 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 914 (6 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,314,950 |
| Reactions total | 240 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 05:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 629 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
565 reactions across 308 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 251 | 44.4% | |
| ❤ | 238 | 42.1% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 2.12% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 1.95% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 1.59% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 1.42% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 1.24% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.885% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 0.708% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.708% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 0.708% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.708% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.354% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.354% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.177% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.177% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.177% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.177% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 358 of the 914 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 914 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 291 posts held from the last 30 days (1.03%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#122体育❗️巨额出款无忧❗️ 📛😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 😀😳😳 😀😀😀😀 👌👌👌USDT存出款,不限IP 提款无上限! PG电子🔔百家乐各大真人视讯 0风控 ❗️0审核 ❗️包出款 不管多大额都给你出款的才牛逼 除了出款稳、其他一无是处!!! 🆘硬核福利🆘❗️ 💎充1000 送300📌 💎充3000送500📌 🔔福利频道: @PG1814 ♾ ✅客服专员: @xixiwct 🥹 ✅注册网址: 1221991.com ✅
👍1
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀九博官方频道: 👉@JBGJ 😀九博官方开奖: 👉@KJ28 😀九博上下分群: 👉@jiubovip 😀九博国际主营: ⚡️😀😀😀 ⚡️ 😀😀 ⚡️😀😀 ⚡️😀😀 ⚡️😀😀⚡️😀😀❤️😀😀 加拿大PC 2.0 / 2.8、网盘、满赔等多种玩法! 单注限红 😀😀W!单期最高赔付高达 😀😀W ! 玩法超乎想象,赔付打破上限,有胆你就来,下注即巅峰! ♾ PC 2.0 【实时反水1万反250】 ♾ PC 2.8 【超高赔率6.4倍】 ♾ 网盘pc【和值13/14正常结算】 ♾ 满赔 PC 【组合赔率高达4.73倍】 ♾ 满赔网盘pc【13/14正常赔付】 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🏦钱包验资: @kpay 💁♀️官方客服: @J111~@J888 💁♀️官方财务: @j444~@j666
👍1
🇿🇼🇿🇲🇾🇪🇪🇭🇼🇫🇻🇳🇻🇪🇺🇿🇻🇮🇺🇾 🥚 8T娱乐城 · 全球数字网投领导者 🥚 实力老品牌 · 信誉保障 · 放心赢 🥚 NO钱包担保1000万U—实力雄厚 🚗 官网:8T.COM 【 铸就人生奇迹】 😀经过多年稳定运营、已成为玩家信赖的首选平台 😀东南亚线上第一盘口、公开透明、高额返水 😀官方游戏+极速出款、认准信誉实力老平台 😀选平台不必四处观望、选我们就是最稳的答案 😁😅😂😇🙃😉🥰😘😛🤪 ♠️ 首存最高赠送 18888U ♠️ 二存三存相赠 8888U ♠️ 大额提款加赠 18888U ♠️每月逢8必发尊享豪礼 ♠️ APP每日抢红包不停! ♠️亿U现金大回馈天天领豪礼 ♠️尊享会员等级+周俸禄+月俸禄 🍏🍎🍐🍊🍋🍋🟩🍌🍉🍇 🔠8T.COM|实力铸就信誉,品质赢取未来 🔠8T.COM|公正公平无私彩,华人首选娱乐 🔠8T.COM|一站式顶级体验,尊享非凡品牌 4️⃣5️⃣6️⃣7️⃣ 8T.CO…
👍1
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 全球布局 · 品牌实力 😀 亿U储备 · 顶级信誉 · 赢家首选 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 单日首充人数突破5000位 😀 当天投注人数突破50000位 😀 玩家累计提现已达600亿USDT 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 注册送😀😀彩金,VIP无条件转移 😀 神秘彩金天天送,人人都有彩金领 😀 负盈返佣高达55%,无需流水出款 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 大额出款更迅速,到账高效更安心 😀神秘大佬狂揽700万U,实力无需解释 😀少林足球豪取176万U,战绩闪耀全场 😀寻宝黄金城爆出109万U,一战封神 —————————————————— 😀 暴富通道:G7.com【USDT】 😀 暴富通道:G7.com【人民币】 😀 点击免费领取能量 —————————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀 G7.com 😀😀😀😀😀 @W777 😀😀😀😀😀 @wwwG7com #G7环球 #G7环球娱乐
👍1
🫤😐🫥😶🤥🫠🤫🫡🫢 😑 N9 国际认证 | 信誉平台 支持5倍验资 【验资:@N9KF】 担保域名:N9.TOP 点击查看 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 💝 新会员好礼 注册就送28.8U 新人首存/二存/三存最高赠送8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣U 💝 老会员好礼 电子狂欢每日存款赠送10% 充值笔笔送3%无上限 夜间充值最高可优惠8888U ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 香港六合彩 4️⃣8️⃣.8️⃣ 倍 加拿大28全网返水最高 ⚡️注册网址:N9.PRO 😇🧐🧐😗🧐😙😄 ⚡️ 官方客服: @N9KF ⚡️ 官方飞投: @N9N9 ⚡️ 彩票客服: @N9CP ⚡️ 彩票飞投: @N9N9N9 ⚡️ 福利频道: @N9pd888 ⚡️ 注册网址: N9.COM【USDT】 ⚡️ 注册网址: N9.C…
👍1
【2028体育】TG全网最大信誉台|玩家首选 东南亚顶级线上娱乐 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ #东南亚盘总首选最权威综合人民币台 集团耗资2亿美金 打造全网最牛逼的线上娱乐平台。⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️ 🤩🤩❤️🤩 20280089.com 人民币平台 不限IP免实名 电子爆率超高 ⭐🎰🤩🤩 8k3350.com USDT平台 全网最高返水 返水3%无上限 #大户首选 支持任意平台vip等级平移,平台支持 USDT 👌微信 👌支付宝 K豆等100多种钱包,首复存均送每日存每日送。 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 😘2028体育精彩爆奖时刻: 😫泰国老板在PP麻将恭喜发财赢250万 😫泰国盘总PP高爆奖星光公主豪炸532万 😫西港极速糖果万倍高爆奖提款 858万 😫缅甸大哥PG电子麻将1单笔提款2000万 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 ⚡️2028体育欢迎各大老板盘…
👍1
公交车上车震
❤1
约炮要戴套 约炮要戴套 约炮要戴套
❤1
👀
强行发骚
👀
越老越入味 !
Showing the 12 most recent of 914 posts we hold for @chiguahs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
10 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“内涵搞笑🫥” (@chiguahs), 107,687 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiguahs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.