Channel
@vipn8888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
79,910subscribers
+165 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002042386885 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @bc6664 @vipn8888 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vipn8888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 79,910 | +37 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 79,873 | +22 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 79,851 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 79,855 | +20 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 79,835 | +69 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 79,766 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 79,767 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 79,758 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 79,762 | +33 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 79,729 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 79,749 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 79,758 | +16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 79,742 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 79,743 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 79,743 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 79,745 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 79,745 | first reading |
147 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 147 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 147 (8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 121,385 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 147 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 147 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#国内资讯 300多部手机24小时轮番群发，江西警方端掉3个“引流车间” 江西丰城警方近日打掉一个专门为境外违法犯罪团伙和黑灰产业提供引流服务的团伙，抓获徐某某等5人，捣毁3处非法信息发送窝点，现场查获手机300余部、手机卡120余张及一批作案工具。 警方调查发现，徐某某等人大量收购二手手机和手机卡，搭建可以同时控制数百部手机的发送平台，利用苹果iMessage批量向国内用户推送“网络赌博”“色情推广”“代开发票”等引流信息。 这些信息通常附带链接，诱导接收者点击并下载涉诈App，再将人员引向非法网站、群聊或后续诈骗环节。 为逃避封堵，这个团伙频繁更换手机卡和苹果ID，安排设备24小时轮换发送。3处窝点内，大量手机长期保持充电和开机状态，形成规模化“引流车间”，不断向外群发垃圾信息，其中还包括“高赔率博彩”“日结刷单”等内容。 警方掌握团伙人员和窝点位置后，刑侦大队联合孙渡派出所展开集中收网，同时突入3处窝点，将正在…
🇻🇳 非法入境买假身份 中国男子获刑五年半 8月14日，越南胡志明市人民法院审理了一起伪造证件及行受贿案。40岁中国籍男子董建于2021年非法入境越南，后支付5万元人民币通过中间人并贿赂越南前公安人员，伪造聋哑病历及出生证明，将假名“裴文豪”录入人口数据库，顺利骗领越南身份证。 法院以使用伪造证件罪和行贿罪判处董建有期徒刑5年6个月。协助其伪造身份的两名同伙及三名涉案前公安人员也分别被判处1年至4年3个月不等的有期徒刑。
🇹🇭 泰国总理阿努廷开飞机 F-16战机护航 昨天，泰国总理阿努廷驾驶一架小型私人飞机飞往呵叻府第1航空团。期间，泰国空军出动3架F-16战机为其护航，进行模拟要员保护演习。 演习中，两架F-16伴飞在阿努廷专机两侧，另一架在其上方护航。第1航空团第103飞行中队还向阿努廷赠送了一枚印有米老鼠图案及“F-16 Fighting Mickey”字样的专属臂章。 国王、总理都会开飞机～～ 这一点柬埔寨是没法比啊
印尼在柬埔寨设立专项警务办公室，合力追查本国被骗公民 印度尼西亚正式在柬埔寨国家警察总部设立专属警务协作窗口，多部门联合办公。加速处理被困柬埔寨的印尼受害者，追踪诈骗团伙资金流向，推进两国联合抓捕行动。
#网友投稿 金边堆谷一带，一名男子疑似吸毒后精神失常，爬上屋顶准备往下跳。
#柬埔寨资讯｜柬方强烈抗议！指泰方再次在争议地区向民众分配土地 柬泰边境土地争议再次升温。 据柬埔寨媒体8月15日报道，柬埔寨方面对泰国有关部门近期再次在Chouk Chey村相关区域向泰国民众分配土地的行为提出强烈抗议。报道指，这已经是泰方在该区域进行的第二轮土地分配行动。 柬方坚持认为，Chouk Chey村相关区域属于柬埔寨领土，因此泰方在当地进行土地测量、划分以及向民众分配土地等行为，涉嫌侵犯柬埔寨的主权和领土完整。 事实上，Chouk Chey村此前已经成为柬泰边境争议的敏感地点之一。今年1月，柬埔寨提交联合国的相关文件中，也将Chouk Chey村列入柬方声称遭泰军控制的区域，并对泰方有关行动提出抗议。 柬埔寨方面强调，将继续通过外交及相关国际机制处理边境争议，并记录有关情况作为证据，同时要求泰方停止在争议区域采取可能进一步改变当地现状的行动。 目前，柬泰双方对于部分边境地区的主权归属仍存在明显分歧，双方…
🔥 柬埔寨一男子点火烧房自焚身亡 今天上午8时15分，柬埔寨特本克蒙省梅莫县庄村发生一起因购买汽油自焚引发的火灾，导致1栋房屋被烧毁，1名男子不幸身亡。 事发后，梅莫县警方迅速出动消防力量赶赴现场扑救，出动1辆消防车成功将火势完全控制，未波及周边邻居。 事故造成40岁男子温特当场死亡，具体案情仍在进一步调查中。
广西特大组织偷渡案今日通报 打掉境内外勾结特大偷渡团伙，摧毁多处出租屋中转窝点，团伙网上发布境外高薪招工，组织人员偷渡出境前往电诈园区，全案400余人落网，12个团伙被打掉。 通报单位：广西崇左边境管理支队 发布时间：2026‑08‑13晚间官方对外发布 案件概况 该案件是境内外蛇头相互勾结的特大组织偷渡专案，团伙核心为余某，专门面向全国招募人员，运送出境前往东南亚电诈园区务工诈骗。 作案流程 1. 线上引流：在社交网络发布虚假境外高薪招聘广告，以高工资、包吃住为诱饵，欺骗全国各地年轻人上钩。 2. 国内中转：把被骗人员集中到华南多地出租屋，设立隐蔽中转窝点统一安置。 3. 边境输送：安排司机、带路蛇头，分批从广西边境便道非法送出境，交给境外蛇头，送入电诈窝点。 行动战果 专案组前后开展52次集中收网行动 • 抓获涉案人员：400余人（包含蛇头、运送司机、偷渡人员） • 打掉犯罪团伙：12个 • 捣毁出租…
涉案5500万美元，印尼破获柬埔寨网赌网络 印尼警方近日捣毁一个国际网络赌博团伙，查明其运营的“Ujangbet”赌博网站服务器位于柬埔寨。 警方在雅加达和棉兰等地展开行动，抓捕9名嫌疑人，并查扣约100亿印尼盾现金及大量手机、银行卡和其他资产。 警方称，该团伙利用手机话费作为赌博充值手段，玩家将话费转入指定号码后，由柬埔寨的管理员统一管理，再通过印尼当地话费代理商低价出售，将赌博资金转换成现金。 印尼警方与金融交易分析中心调查发现，2025年4月至2026年4月间，相关交易金额超过8900亿印尼盾（约5500万美元）。目前警方仍在追查柬埔寨方面的涉案人员。
🚨 最新消息——请尽快转发扩散！ 据悉，一名男子于2026年8月15日上午遭一辆身份不明的汽车撞倒并碾压，最终当场不幸身亡。 事故发生在金边市棉芷区斯登棉芷二分区217号路沿线。 目前，涉事车辆的身份及相关情况仍有待进一步调查。
泰缅边境出现新大型诈骗园区“瑞当尼” 多个迹象引发关注 近日，泰缅边境地区出现一个名为“瑞当尼”（Shwe Taung Ni）的新型大型园区，引发外界关注。 据了解，该园区位于缅甸克伦邦DKBA控制区域，靠近DKBA总部，与泰国美索地区仅隔一条梅河，从泰方部分区域可直接看到园区建筑。 现场信息显示，园区内建设有大量封闭式宿舍，并进行编号管理，同时配备大面积太阳能设备和星链网络设施。目前已有人员入住迹象，园区规模可容纳数千人，外围安保较为严密。 由于雨季期间缅甸一侧道路条件较差，园区物资和人员运输主要依赖泰国一侧通道，通过美索、坡帕及边境道路运输后，再进入园区。 此前，部分诈骗园区遭到打击后，有人员被转移至该区域。消息称，DKBA控制范围内还有多个类似项目正在建设，诈骗活动可能正从集中式大型园区向更加分散化模式转移。
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 《🇬🇾东南亚新闻》东南亚资讯|东南亚曝光 📢 东南亚风云大小事 📢 ◒迪拜曝光|迪拜新闻◒ 迪拜资讯 📢 缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 泰国华人柬埔寨新闻曝光 📢 菲律宾资讯◒《菲律宾曝光》菲律宾新闻 📢 西港日记 柬埔寨快讯 📢 嘉兴·風與故人 📢 🅥 缅甸头条新闻|东南亚新闻报社- Internatio ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
Showing the 12 most recent of 147 posts we hold for @vipn8888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,127,996 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚新闻💎” (@vipn8888), 79,910 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vipn8888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.