Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 中文段子吃瓜中心

Channel

中文段子吃瓜中心

@chiguale8

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,131subscribers

+4,975 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001459978805
TypeChannel
Username@chiguale8
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chiguale8

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,87121,84918,3607 August 2026 — 15,156 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,186 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,193 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,131 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,146 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,186 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,152 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,092 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,135 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,161 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,000 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,871 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,890 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,974 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,003 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,043 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,030 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,049 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,078 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,104 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,118 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,137 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,536 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,245 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,219 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,284 subscribers6 September 2026 — 21,425 subscribers10 September 2026 — 21,515 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,521 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,623 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,728 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,849 subscribers30 September 2026 — 20,131 subscribers20,1317 August 202630 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 54 days, net +4,975. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,824–22,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 03:0120,131-1,718
18 Sept 2026, 00:4021,849+121
15 Sept 2026, 17:2121,728+105
14 Sept 2026, 02:0121,623+102
12 Sept 2026, 09:3921,521+6
10 Sept 2026, 05:2021,515+90
6 Sept 2026, 21:0221,425+141
4 Sept 2026, 04:4021,284+65
2 Sept 2026, 20:4821,219-26
1 Sept 2026, 17:1821,245+709
31 Aug 2026, 20:3620,536-601
30 Aug 2026, 23:1321,137+19
29 Aug 2026, 22:1421,118+14
28 Aug 2026, 22:2521,104+26
27 Aug 2026, 21:4321,078+29
26 Aug 2026, 21:3421,049+19
25 Aug 2026, 20:0321,030-13
24 Aug 2026, 21:2721,043+40
23 Aug 2026, 07:0821,003+6,029
21 Aug 2026, 20:0814,974first reading

Engagement

417 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.63%
avg views ÷ 20,131 subscribers
Avg views / post
731
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
80
of 417 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held417 (6 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total58,443
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 15:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4h 11m
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 307 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC768 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

曲周16岁少年跳河,硬生生把自己溺死,一下子都不挣扎

28 Sept 2026, 04:40 UTC708 viewsread 28 September 2026

#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 吃瓜中心 📢 吃瓜群众💋 📢 吃瓜新闻站 📢 极品吃瓜︱搞笑视频! 📢 抖音美女吃瓜网红露出 📢 巨乳黑丝吃瓜猎奇圈 📢 Telegram中文吃瓜 📢 吃瓜群众《中文奇趣百科》 📢 东南亚大事件pg电子曝光 📢 东南亚头条新闻网(吃瓜曝光) ------------------------------ 🤝 加入互推 · 获得曝光,赚邀请奖励

27 Sept 2026, 12:13 UTC989 viewsread 28 September 2026
Video

由于伊朗封锁了霍尔木兹海峡,伊拉克无法运输石油,于是向叙利亚开放了边境。数千辆满载石油的油罐车正经由叙利亚陆路运往国际市场

27 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC970 viewsread 28 September 2026
Photo

广州-岭南印象园表演时从高处坠落女演员报平安

27 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC987 viewsread 28 September 2026
Video

今天凌晨,一家日本航空公司的航班在东京羽田降落时,在跑道上与日本海岸警卫队的Dash 8相撞

Showing the 12 most recent of 417 posts we hold for @chiguale8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

说实话景甜这个颜值我只能给到5分,不知道她为什么能成为内娱顶流梯队。 你们给景甜的颜值打几分?

  1. 1到3分25%
  2. 4到6分38%
  3. 7到8分25%
  4. 9到10分13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 417 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

中文吃瓜中心沙雕日常 🍉
@chigua_a · 208,460
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
泰国大事件
@qiusu664 · 52,154
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 24 August 2026
全网吃瓜🍉
@aichiguaba · 245,430
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
电竞体育 LPL中文推单🫥
@dianjingtuidan1 · 91,698
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“中文段子吃瓜中心” (@chiguale8), 20,131 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiguale8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.