#网友爆料:缅甸三佛塔帕亚松如,定位的黑园区 园区都是新建起来的铁皮房,周边就建了一圈围墙围起来,里面都是做国盘资金盘,精聊,军包的黑公司,每天都是上班17个小时起步,每天体罚两个小时,每天动不动就喊安保拿pc管打员工,而且园区里面还有小黑屋,拿手铐吊起来,不给吃饭喝水也不给休息,就是吊着拿pc管打 他们那个园区很小,整个园区加起来总共才几百个人
😭1

Channel
@baoguangee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
179,272subscribers
-29,326 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001978819756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @baoguangee @xingpai @xinwen_toutiao_baoguang |
| Description | #迪拜 #泰国 #菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #缅甸 #中国 #老挝 #斯里兰卡 #新闻资讯 #博彩 #狗推 各大社会事件新闻,要点资讯,安危事件,曝光爆料,时事新闻,社会热点推送。 投稿: @BBBBBE 划水摸鱼讨论组 : @xinwen847 投稿机器人: @baoguangee_bot 商务合作联系: @bbbbbe 斯里兰卡商家合集 : @alankawaimai |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 76 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguangee |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:42 | 179,272 | +3,531 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 175,741 | -3,320 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:55 | 179,061 | -807 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 179,868 | -355 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 180,223 | -2,968 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 183,191 | +3,329 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 179,862 | -154 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 180,016 | -3,952 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 183,968 | -588 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 184,556 | -251 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 184,807 | -1,637 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 186,444 | -1,197 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 187,641 | -867 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 188,508 | -3,189 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 191,697 | -1,787 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 193,484 | -105 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 193,589 | -4,457 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 198,046 | -906 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 198,952 | -752 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 199,704 | first reading |
1,275 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 683 of 688 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,275 (7 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,211,139 |
| Reactions total | 4,366 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 257 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,507 reactions across 987 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,082 | 16.6% | |
| 👌 | 991 | 15.2% | |
| 🤡 | 963 | 14.8% | |
| ❤ | 834 | 12.8% | |
| 🤣 | 575 | 8.84% | |
| 😭 | 558 | 8.58% | |
| 😱 | 362 | 5.56% | |
| 🙏 | 281 | 4.32% | |
| 🥰 | 188 | 2.89% | |
| 🤬 | 154 | 2.37% | |
| 👏 | 91 | 1.40% | |
| 😁 | 72 | 1.11% | |
| 🤩 | 69 | 1.06% | |
| 🎉 | 66 | 1.01% | |
| 🔥 | 59 | 0.907% | |
| ⚡ | 58 | 0.891% | |
| 🤔 | 42 | 0.645% | |
| 🥴 | 28 | 0.43% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 0.353% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 0.138% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.031% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 987 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 19 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友爆料:缅甸三佛塔帕亚松如,定位的黑园区 园区都是新建起来的铁皮房,周边就建了一圈围墙围起来,里面都是做国盘资金盘,精聊,军包的黑公司,每天都是上班17个小时起步,每天体罚两个小时,每天动不动就喊安保拿pc管打员工,而且园区里面还有小黑屋,拿手铐吊起来,不给吃饭喝水也不给休息,就是吊着拿pc管打 他们那个园区很小,整个园区加起来总共才几百个人
😭1
#群友投稿:亲爱的亮哥,财通金湾到戈公数字新城,以这种方式让你认识。 我是今年过完年跟随着公司到老挝,大年三十正好十五号发工资提成,一分不发,过年给一人200,后面发生的事情我不说你也都知道。 所谓的公司搬迁,就是骗我们来老挝,然后把我们卖给新公司。我们偷渡的先过来了,剩下的有护照是后来的。 到老挝,环境首先不说有多苦,和我们之前做的项目都不一样。 大哥要带我们走,你不是认识吗?你不是有钱吗?为什么已读不回?说好的到老挝发工资发提成,钱呢? 最后我们被送进东鹏,看守所关了多久。最终我们妥协了,没钱给。 最终几人只有被老挝警方交人头送到云南,我被打的那些天,我都记得。 现在我出来了,我送回国受的苦,家里花的钱,还有我的工资,我一笔一笔跟你们算。 其他人的决定都是你的默许,慢慢来。 想处理就联系我,不想处理,下一个帖子就发你照片。发完照片还是不处理,那就继续发,我看你能坐得住多久。
👌1👍1🤡1
#网友反馈:很多警车往木牌方向去了,不知道有什么行动,在那边的注意了。
🔥2👍1😭1🙏1
#群友爆料:三佛塔瀑布黑园区经纬度:15.233577°N,98.181230°E。 这里面两家黑公司,瑞丰集团和远程集团,都是做军包的,打电话伪装成红娘做婚恋项目,做的烟草盘口,还有从各种小软件上打粉,没有自引,新增就扛着水桶,跪着上班。 这两个公司是两个不同的老板,管理人员都是云贵川的,从老家过来的。我们这些员工都是骗招进来的,两个公司加起来150-200人左右,卖了一部分人。两家公司每个月涉案入金总额800万左右。 进到园区里面就没收身份证、护照、私人手机。这段时间部分公司已经陆陆续续搬走了,应该是已经搬到其他的地方办公去了。 地方武装每隔一段时间都会到办公室检查有没有受伤,他们都会提前收到通知,把人藏起来,藏到园区请的本地保安住的地方,检查完以后再上班。 这个园区三面环山,出园区只有一条路,出园区以后有一个检查的兵站,天天停网。这段时间已经有部分公司陆陆续续搬走了,应该是有检查。 远程股东叫二哥,大管叫佑东。…
👍1🤬1😭1😱1
柬反腐局好不容易搞条大鱼, 案子必须办成铁案~~
❤1👌1👍1
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😑🤔😵💫🤐盛世华诞 · MK飞投与您同庆 😑🙄🫨🥱 👍MK与您相伴,畅玩体育、彩票、视讯、电子,享受公平公正的极致体验。 👍加入MK飞投,让快乐加倍,财富加码! ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ 😍😍😍😍😍😍TG投注定义者😍开云出品|双边返水0⃣🔣9⃣🔣·免实名免绑卡不限IP📱飞投入口🔣 🔣活动咨询 🔥🔥MK小飞机直投平台🅾️首复存周投注返利🅾️福利超多发放超快🅾️2026世界杯指定投注平台🅾️点击直接游戏🔥🔥 【无ip限制】MK小飞机投注链接:点击直接跳转
❤2👍2🥰2
波贝洪水中惊现大鳄鱼,当地警方和民众合力将其抓获 9月29日上午,波贝市中央市场分区4号村一带正遭遇洪水,当地警方及相关部门联合民众,成功抓获一条体型很大的鳄鱼。被抓获后,鳄鱼已被转移到安全地点暂时安置,等待后续处理。 波贝市政府提醒民众提高警惕,尤其不要让孩子下洪水中玩水,以免发生意外,同时也要小心洪水中可能出现的蛇等危险动物。 PS:嘎嘣脆,鸡肉味🤣
👍2👏2😱2
🌼🌼🌼☺☺月☺☺️日🌼🌼🌼 😇😇易换官方汇率😇😇 🌎 全球多币种兑换,一站式服务 ⏰ 快捷便捷|安全可靠|汇率优惠 🎮 抖音、快手、虎牙等平台充值。 🤑 支持 USDT、美元、东南亚各种币。 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 🇻🇳越南盾 ✖️ 412.00 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 😀USDT ➗ 62.55👍👍 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 😀美金 ➗ 62.70 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 🇰🇭柬美金 ➗ 63.52 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 👍转卡 ➗ 9.30 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 🇭🇰港币 ➗ 8.14 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 👍存现 ➗ 9.57 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 🇹🇭泰铢 ➗ 1.901 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 🇦🇪迪拉姆 ➗ 17.29 🇵🇭披索 ➡️ 🇹🇼台币 ➗ 1.982 🇵🇭披索 …
❤2👌2👍2
🇱🇦老挝沙湾拿吉省警方查处涉嫌网络犯罪及贩卖违禁品团伙,抓捕14名中国人和1名老挝人 9月28日,老挝沙湾拿吉省警察总部特别工作组联合凯山丰威汉市警察局及省人民检察院,对凯山丰威汉市两处涉嫌违法活动的场所开展检查。 警方首先搜查了位于班蓬萨旺泰村的一处出租房屋,现场发现15名嫌疑人,包括14名中国籍人员和1名老挝籍人员,并查获38台台式电脑和41部手机。 随后,警方搜查了萨南赛村一处出租公寓。该公寓涉嫌与贩卖卡特叶及止咳糖浆有关。警方在现场发现两名老挝籍嫌疑人(一男一女),并查获3大袋、134小袋卡特叶,22,963瓶止咳糖浆及1辆大型汽车。 目前,省警察局仍在调查此案,以进一步查明相关人员及涉案情况,并依法追究责任。 PS:锄禾日当午,上班好辛苦😂
🤡2🤣2🥰2👍1
看来之前的富人查税风波是真的了,彭博今天发了篇信息量巨大的专题。 里面写道了不少,本轮针对富人的税务追查案例,力度空前。甚至海底捞的联创也被查了,其中香港是这轮征税的重点目标之一,还提到了后续即将可能到来的遗产税。
❤3👍3😱3⚡1🥰1
9月28日,彭博社引述知情人士报道,中国税务部门已组建特别小组,追踪富豪并向其征税,部分小组甚至专门针对一名亿万富翁。
👍3🥰3😱3🔥2
#EBpay #畅享无界支付 💸 EBpay - 顶级收付款钱包 😀😀😃 高效、安全、稳定的支付解决方案 顶级技术,让资金轻松流转 专业服务,全天侯在线客服 极速交易,为全球用户提供便捷的充值体验🤣🤣🤣🤣 🥰 业界首选-专业钱包 🥰 💸 EBpay 顶级优势: ❤资金极速到账,流畅交易体验 ❤顶级技术团队,系统稳定运行,保障交易安全 ❤7×24 客服支持,问题及时响应 ❤支持 🥰 📖 📏 💗 📱 多种支付方式 🥰 稳定交易 × 极速到账 × 无界支付 🥰 支付持续在线。陪你一起迎接每一次精彩瞬间! 😃😃😃 EBpay|无界支付,快人一步 ——————————————————— 🥹招商热线: @EBpay08 🤓官方频道: @EBpayHQ 🤩官方网站: www.ebpay.net
❤3👍3🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,275 posts we hold for @baoguangee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@baoguangee named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 100 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“斯里兰卡头条新闻曝光” (@baoguangee), 179,272 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguangee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.