#菲律宾 #外国人工作许可申请 放宽!审批时间缩短至10个工作日,申请材料也减少了! 11月13日,菲律宾劳工与就业部宣布调整外国人就业许可证(AEP)申请程序。根据2026年第248-C号部门令,新规已于11月12日生效。 标准审批时间从原来的15个工作日缩短至10个工作日,同时取消部分申请材料及自费报纸公告要求,进一步简化外国人在菲合法就业的手续。
❤1👌1👍1

Channel
@baoguangee
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
198,442subscribers
-10,156 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001978819756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @baoguangee @xingpai @xinwen_toutiao_baoguang |
| Description | #迪拜 #泰国 #菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #缅甸 #中国 #老挝 #斯里兰卡 #新闻资讯 #博彩 #狗推 各大社会事件新闻,要点资讯,安危事件,曝光爆料,时事新闻,社会热点推送。 投稿: @BBBBBE 划水摸鱼讨论组 : @xinwen847 投稿机器人: @baoguangee_bot 商务合作联系: @bbbbbe 斯里兰卡商家合集 : @alankawaimai |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 168 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguangee |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @baoguangee/143139 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC | @quanqiubaoliao/6774121 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC | 1.00 | 44 minutes |
| @baoguangee/143240 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC | @quanqiubaoliao/6778622 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC | 1.00 | 38 minutes |
| @baoguangee/143531 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC | @quanqiubaoliao/6793525 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC | 1.00 | 8 minutes |
| @baoguangee/145376 · this entry16 Sept 2026, 17:39 UTC | @quanqiubaoliao/6876916 Sept 2026, 18:13 UTC | 1.00 | 34 minutes |
| @baoguangee/145467 · this entry17 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC | @quanqiubaoliao/6881717 Sept 2026, 19:31 UTC | 1.00 | 68 minutes |
| @baoguangee/145662 · this entry19 Sept 2026, 19:42 UTC | @quanqiubaoliao/6891420 Sept 2026, 03:17 UTC | 1.00 | 7.6 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @quanqiubaoliao | 42 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 38 minutes | this entry (41–1) |
| @xinwen66666 | 39 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 38 minutes | this entry (38–1) |
| @JPZJBFBI | 24 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.1 hours | @JPZJBFBI (22–2) |
| @ttdsj8 | 18 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 21 hours | this entry (15–3) |
| @bg215 | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3.1 hours | @bg215 (10–7) |
| @HKDSJ0 | 16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3.6 hours | @HKDSJ0 (16–0) |
| @riben001 | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3.9 hours | @riben001 (15–0) |
| @syxw7 | 15 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | under a minute | this entry (15–0) |
| @TGmrcg | 13 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 22 hours | this entry (11–2) |
| @baoguang_qun | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.9 hours | @baoguang_qun (11–2) |
| @sjhrcg | 12 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 22 hours | this entry (10–2) |
| @bg874 | 12 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.6 hours | @bg874 (7–5) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 180 of the 180 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,009 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 10:04 | 198,442 | -7 |
| 12 Nov 2026, 15:14 | 198,449 | -677 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 15:41 | 199,126 | +669 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:18 | 198,457 | +725 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 14:16 | 197,732 | -112 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:38 | 197,844 | -505 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 09:07 | 198,349 | -3,916 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 23:41 | 202,265 | -208 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:20 | 202,473 | -1,025 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:48 | 203,498 | +3,408 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:09 | 200,090 | +3,118 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:28 | 196,972 | -772 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 19:29 | 197,744 | -349 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:15 | 198,093 | -23 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:07 | 198,116 | -370 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:26 | 198,486 | -481 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:50 | 198,967 | -208 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:40 | 199,175 | -256 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 199,431 | -94 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:25 | 199,525 | first reading |
2,439 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 731 of 732 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,439 (7 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 6,394,484 |
| Reactions total | 5,762 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 226 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,765 reactions across 997 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,528 | 19.7% | |
| ❤ | 897 | 11.6% | |
| 🤡 | 868 | 11.2% | |
| 😱 | 825 | 10.6% | |
| 👌 | 773 | 9.95% | |
| 😭 | 481 | 6.19% | |
| 🤣 | 452 | 5.82% | |
| 🥰 | 373 | 4.80% | |
| 🙏 | 361 | 4.65% | |
| 👏 | 251 | 3.23% | |
| 🎉 | 168 | 2.16% | |
| 😁 | 161 | 2.07% | |
| ⚡ | 154 | 1.98% | |
| 🤬 | 152 | 1.96% | |
| 🤩 | 149 | 1.92% | |
| 🔥 | 140 | 1.80% | |
| 🤗 | 17 | 0.219% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.077% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 0.052% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.039% | |
| 1 further kind | 2 | 0.026% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 997 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,765 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 732 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#菲律宾 #外国人工作许可申请 放宽!审批时间缩短至10个工作日,申请材料也减少了! 11月13日,菲律宾劳工与就业部宣布调整外国人就业许可证(AEP)申请程序。根据2026年第248-C号部门令,新规已于11月12日生效。 标准审批时间从原来的15个工作日缩短至10个工作日,同时取消部分申请材料及自费报纸公告要求,进一步简化外国人在菲合法就业的手续。
❤1👌1👍1
#网友投稿:希望东风园区江总看到后,能够为我们这些底层的兄弟们主持公道。 博创公司拖欠员工业绩提成,始终不发。其他公司在监狱里给员工发放生活费,出来后给予补偿。唯独我们博创公司,在监狱里没人管就算了,回来后没有补偿,这些我们也能忍。 可是,兄弟们做出的业绩,答应给的工资和业绩提成也不给。毕竟,兄弟们都是拿命挣点窝囊废。这点业绩,公司当初承诺的,为什么现在不给?就这样,消息也不读、不回,怎样对得起兄弟们? 任何一个集团也好,公司也好,都离不开我们这些底层的“狗推”助力。 过河拆桥,太不地道了。当初承诺的算什么?兄弟们逃命几个月,担惊受怕,又坐了一年牢狱,九死一生,终于回到国内。还要面临“帽子叔叔”的压力,哪些不需要用钱?希望领导们看见后,能够换位思考。我们只是想要回属于自己的那一份而已。 江总旗下东风园区东创集团——博创公司 老板:黄毛、大洋(兼财务) 总监:麻子 组长:阿山、大宝 督导:宝森 从2025年10月下旬公…
👌1🤡1🤣1
吉隆坡👮♂️大行动🌪全体单位集合!👮♂️ 大规模扫荡行动即将展开。
🤡1😭1😱1
缅甸木姐郊外南翁村一处名为雅泰农场诈骗窝点有20人从该区域逃脱,目前由三兄弟联盟控制的武装力量窝点。 11月8日,20多名在诈骗窝点工作的人员从“雅泰农场”逃出,进入了南翁村及其周边地区。其中还包括一名据说是俄罗斯籍的男子。 当同盟军进行追捕时,部分人被重新抓获并被同盟军士兵带走”据当地人反映,虽然部分逃出者被同盟军武装(MNDAA)成员抓回,但具体被带走的人数尚不清楚。 据当地居民介绍,这些从事“网络诈骗”活动的人员所逃离的雅泰农场,位于南翁村外。在“1027行动”之前,该地点由“龙堂(龙潭)民团占据。 另一位当地居民解释说,在“1027行动”期间,随着德昂民族解放军(TNLA)攻占了相关城镇,龙堂(龙潭)民团撤离了该处。 此后,该地点先是被TNLA武装力量占据,随后又被果敢民族民主同盟军(MNDAA)接管;目前,该处由MNDAA人员控制。 “那个‘雅泰农场以前是个草莓园,过去‘龙堂(龙潭)民团曾驻扎在那里,但现…
👍2😱1🙏1
#印尼资讯:警方破获5起人口贩卖案件,13名嫌疑人被确定,涉及海外非法招工及雇佣兵招募 11月13日报道,印尼国家警察刑事调查局于11月12日在雅加达公布调查结果,宣布破获5起涉嫌人口贩卖案件,共确定13名犯罪嫌疑人,涉及13名受害者。案件涵盖非法海外劳工招募、跨国婚姻介绍,以及以高薪工作为诱饵招募人员前往俄罗斯从事雇佣兵相关活动。 警方调查发现,犯罪嫌疑人主要通过社交媒体及通讯软件发布虚假招聘信息,以高薪家政工作、海外就业和婚姻介绍为诱饵,招募印尼民众出国。其中,部分女性被以嫁给中国公民为名招募,另有人员被承诺前往俄罗斯从事后勤、安保及医疗工作,实际却涉嫌被安排参与雇佣兵相关活动。 在涉及中国婚姻介绍网络的案件中,嫌疑人向印尼女性承诺支付2000万至2500万印尼盾聘礼,并每月提供400万至500万印尼盾生活费。警方调查还发现,相关女性个人资料疑似被发送至中国代理网络,每名女性的交易金额据称达到4亿至5亿印尼盾。 此外…
⚡3🤡3👍2🥰2
#网友投稿:今晚金边出动数百名联合执法人员,包括宪兵、特种干预部队及刑事警察等,在会议期间加强治安巡逻和安保工作。 没带护照的兄弟们,就别出来瞎几把乱逛了。
👏5🤣4😱4
#EBpay #畅享无界支付 💸 EBpay - 顶级收付款钱包 😀😀😃 高效、安全、稳定的支付解决方案 顶级技术,让资金轻松流转 专业服务,全天侯在线客服 极速交易,为全球用户提供便捷的充值体验🤣🤣🤣🤣 🥰 业界首选-专业钱包 🥰 💸 EBpay 顶级优势: ❤资金极速到账,流畅交易体验 ❤顶级技术团队,系统稳定运行,保障交易安全 ❤7×24 客服支持,问题及时响应 ❤支持 🥰 📖 📏 💗 📱 多种支付方式 🥰 稳定交易 × 极速到账 × 无界支付 🥰 支付持续在线。陪你一起迎接每一次精彩瞬间! 😃😃😃 EBpay|无界支付,快人一步 ——————————————————— 🥹招商热线: @EBpay08 🤓官方频道: @EBpayHQ 🤩官方网站: www.ebpay.net
❤4👍4🥰4
越南下龙市破获韩国跨国诈骗团伙,9名韩国籍嫌疑人被捕,涉案金额达15.5亿韩元 11月13日,据韩国媒体报道,韩国首尔警察厅公布一起发生在越南的跨国诈骗案件,9名韩国籍犯罪嫌疑人因涉嫌冒充韩国军方实施建筑材料采购诈骗,已被陆续逮捕并移送检方,目前均处于羁押状态。 调查显示,该犯罪团伙于2025年11月至2026年6月期间,以越南广宁省下龙市为主要活动地点,冒充韩国军方相关单位工作人员,向韩国境内建筑承包商谎称需要采购建筑材料,并要求受害企业通过指定代理公司购买相关物资。 嫌疑人随后以预付款、材料采购款等名义收取资金,在收到款项后便失去联系,实施所谓的“无货交付”诈骗。 警方调查发现,该团伙利用电话中继设备,将从越南拨出的境外电话伪装成韩国本地电话号码,同时通过假名片及伪造的官方文件增强可信度,以此降低受害企业的警惕。 截至目前,该团伙已涉嫌诈骗韩国62家建筑承包商,累计涉案金额约15.5亿韩元,折合约110万美元。 …
❤4👌4🤡4
#群友投稿:注意!吉隆坡近期严查非法务工与无证居留,出门务必带齐证件! 最近,吉隆坡多地执法力度明显加大,警方、移民局和市政局正在展开多部门联合突击检查(包括夜店、夜市、建筑工地及商业区等重点区域)。此次行动主要针对以下几类情况: 一、无证居留与逾期逗留: 未持有合法有效旅行证件,或签证已过期的人士。 二、滥用签证与非法务工: 持旅游/社交签证(Social Visit Pass)却在本地打工,或持建筑、清洁等特定行业准证,却跨行业在娱乐场所、餐饮店务工的行为。 三、电信诈骗与非法窝点: 针对隐藏在商业大楼或公寓内的非法呼叫中心及跨国犯罪团伙的清剿。 安全提醒: 在马工作、生活或旅游的朋友,近期出门随身携带护照原件及有效签证/准证证明,以备执法人员随时核查。 切勿抱有侥幸心理,从事与签证类型不符的工作。一旦被查获,不仅面临罚款与扣留,还会被列入黑名单 夜间尽量避免前往人员复杂、治安隐患较高的娱乐场所或无牌经营地段。希望大…
👍4👏4😱4
东盟峰会聚焦跨国电诈问题,中美及东南亚国家拟加强联合打击 11月13日,据美联社及菲律宾当地媒体报道,跨国网络诈骗、人口贩卖及诈骗园区问题预计将成为即将在菲律宾马尼拉举行的东盟峰会重要议题。东盟成员国、中国、美国及其他合作伙伴有望进一步加强合作,共同应对日益严重的跨国网络犯罪。 据报道,此次会议将重点讨论跨境网络诈骗、人口贩卖、非法资金流动及诈骗园区等问题,并推动各国加强金融监管、数字安全建设、跨境情报共享和执法协调。 在打击措施方面,各方拟通过加强国际合作,追踪诈骗集团资金流向,协调跨境执法行动,拆除非法诈骗窝点,并追究相关犯罪组织及幕后人员的责任。 与此同时,会议也将关注被迫参与诈骗活动人员的处境,推动加强受害者识别、救援及保护工作,避免将遭人口贩卖和强迫劳动的受害者简单视为犯罪嫌疑人。 相关背景数据显示,联合国报告曾对全球网络诈骗造成的经济损失发出警告,相关犯罪已经成为影响多个国家社会安全、金融秩序及区域稳定的跨国…
👍4🤣4😱4
#群友爆料:缅甸掸邦孟哈假日酒店往前一个村里,里面的人生不如死,都是被骗上去这个地方的。 有干军包的、股转的,当地保护伞是傣族兵,外号“少爷”。公司里面物业叫外号“阿峰”。 一天除了骂骂咧咧,你能干嘛?以为穿上本地服装就是本地人了吗?还有你那小三,外号“四姐”(本地人),说是当阳万海很有实力呢!你也就仗着你这个小三,在那山里面作威作福了。心情不好,连本地保安都打,真不怕哪天回来佤邦地区被绑了吗? 办公室所有人的照片,以及老板的照片,暂时就不发了。劝你早点把他们都放了,要不然下一步就是查你祖宗十八代。狗屁都不是的玩意儿,混东南亚那么多年,没听说物业管业绩的! 劝你早点放了他们。你也可以连夜转移,已经帮你上报老缅了。你那个窝呆不久,看看少爷保得住你么!
🤣4🤬4😱4
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🇻🇳🇻🇪🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇪 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🏆 多元游戏 · 一站畅玩 🏆 真人/电子/体育/棋牌/捕鱼/彩票 🏆 每日返水 · 福利不断 🏆 极速出款 · 高效服务 🏆 7×24小时在线客服 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆支持认证:点击可查 🌟😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷 🌟😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆: M8.com 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆: @m8baby04 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆: @m8vvip 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷: @M8COM04_bot
❤4👍4🥰4
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,439 posts we hold for @baoguangee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@baoguangee named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 100 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“斯里兰卡头条新闻曝光” (@baoguangee), 198,442 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguangee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.