Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

极速电竞

@QSTY2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

61,856subscribers

-879 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001229895566
TypeChannel
Username@QSTY2
Description最快速度推送LOL、CS2、Valorant、Dota2最新赛事资讯、转会爆料及深度战报。尽享电竞圈热点,只看干货。🔗 联系/合作: @aiFPX
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/QSTY2

Growth

61,85662,73562,295.56 August 2026 — 62,735 subscribers7 August 2026 — 62,711 subscribers8 August 2026 — 62,564 subscribers9 August 2026 — 62,357 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62,240 subscribers11 August 2026 — 62,067 subscribers12 August 2026 — 61,927 subscribers13 August 2026 — 61,856 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -879. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,724–62,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:0861,856-71
12 Aug 2026, 09:1161,927-140
11 Aug 2026, 09:5262,067-173
10 Aug 2026, 09:3262,240-117
9 Aug 2026, 10:0462,357-207
8 Aug 2026, 06:5762,564-147
7 Aug 2026, 05:0462,711-24
6 Aug 2026, 22:3162,735first reading

Engagement

119 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.50%
avg views ÷ 61,856 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,170
119 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.064%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
119
of 119 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 119 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held119 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total257,990
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,010
Videos
1,090
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20m 36s
Average length
2m 17s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 56 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3546.7%
👍2229.3%
🔥68.00%
👏56.67%
👌22.67%
🥰22.67%
👀11.33%
💯11.33%
😍11.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈2,020 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段 BLG 对战 JDG(BO3) 第三局独赢:BLG 击杀让分: JDG+8.5 击杀人头:小32.5 比赛时间:大32

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,690 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

#BLG首局集锦 辛德拉团战大放异彩,BLG守住优势赢下首局

1

12 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈1,670 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

KSG/SYG第三局语音回放:找线慢慢打,下路一波了,奈斯!

1

12 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,710 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段 BLG 对战 JDG(BO3) 第二局独赢:BLG 击杀让分: JDG+8.5 击杀人头:大32.5 比赛时间:大32

12 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段 BLG 对战 JDG(BO3) 第一局独赢:BLG 击杀让分: JDG+9.5 击杀人头:大31.5 比赛时间:小32

12 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段 BLG 对战 JDG(BO3) 全局获胜:BLG 地图比分:2 - 1 地图让分: JDG+1.5 地图大小:大2.5

12 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#LCK 韩国冠军联赛 - 第3-4回合 KT 对战 DK( BO3) 第二局独赢:DK 击杀让分:KT+6.5 击杀人头:小27.5 比赛时间:小32

12 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,760 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#LPL 中国职业联赛 - 第三赛段 EDG 对战 AL(BO3) 第三局独赢: AL 击杀让分: AL-10.5 击杀人头:大28.5 比赛时间:小31

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @QSTY2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 917,635 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“极速电竞” (@QSTY2), 61,856 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QSTY2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.