#网友投稿西港一女子从8楼跳下 奇迹生还! 今(26日)晚11时40分,西港一名女子从8楼一跃而下,跌落在一栋私人住宅的铁皮屋顶上,奇迹幸存,就问你们牛逼不牛逼,硬不硬! ps:不知道有没有把她摔醒 #以下为频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 【X6宝马会】U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注:@X6YL ——————————————— 🔔 订阅频道:@svip40 ➡️ 投稿爆料:@bx617 😅

Channel
东南亚华人情报站
@svip40
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
110,383subscribers
+8,143 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001954248273 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @svip40 |
| Description | #菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #缅甸 #中国 #新闻资讯 华人日记专注于华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,干货美食推荐,看尽华人大小事情。 澄清爆料联系: @bx617 商务广告: @bx342 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/svip40 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 110,383 | -71 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 110,454 | -200 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 110,654 | -220 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 110,874 | -307 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 111,181 | -1,149 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 112,330 | -369 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 112,699 | -287 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:23 | 112,986 | +17,057 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 95,929 | +30,694 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:08 | 65,235 | -92 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 65,327 | -148 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 65,475 | -164 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 65,639 | -302 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 65,941 | -104 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 66,045 | -105 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 66,150 | -27 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 66,177 | -166 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 66,343 | -524 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 66,867 | -241 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 67,108 | first reading |
Engagement
1,200 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.49%
- avg views ÷ 110,383 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,650
- 711 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.145%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 711
- of 1,200 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 451 of 711 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,200 (8 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,169,692 |
| Reactions total | 976 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 22:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈61,100
- Videos
- ≈8,830
- Links
- ≈41,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3h 39m
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 375 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,359 reactions across 616 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 713 | 52.5% | |
| 🔥 | 630 | 46.4% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 0.515% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.147% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.147% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 0.147% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.074% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.074% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 621 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,359 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#网友爆料:缅甸掸邦北部“木姐”大桥关卡过去,半砍街子右拐,岔去以前的旧金山赌场酒店,里面有大量中国人在做中国盘诈骗。 里面有200个中国人,400个缅华,中国人都是枪手,缅华是去做拉手的,项目是跑粉,在微信、抖音、快手、白条、头条去关注国内的老年人实施诈骗。 里面中国人很嚣张、无法无天,欠工资,诱骗木姐缅华去诈骗国内人,干了一个多月不发给工资也不让走。 位置是以前的旧金山和老宾馆,里面是傣族武装北掸邦军(SSPP-SSA-N)武装,实行诈骗的位置也是北掸邦军(SSPP-SSA-N)在木姐半砍的总部。 里面傣族很喜欢这帮诈骗犯,因为他们地区的经济提高了很多。希望木姐和瑞丽的防诈中心尽快实施行动把他们都端了! #以下为频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 【X6宝马会】U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注:@X6YL ——————————————— 🔔 订阅频道:@svip40 ➡️ 投稿…
#群友求助:8号园区做过国内业务的有没有事?监控会不会曝光?现在很担心,一直不敢回去。 我是26年2月份走的,前几天看到有报道说监控被曝光,所以现在一直不敢回去,在金三角苟且偷生。想知道个答案,之前一起做事的现在一个都联系不上了。 #以下为频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 【X6宝马会】U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注:@X6YL ——————————————— 🔔 订阅频道:@svip40 ➡️ 投稿爆料:@bx617 😅
#网友分享:在柬的兄弟们,如果你们没钱、没护照,签证又逾期了,想回国的话,就不用再去大使馆咨询了,我已经帮你们问过了。 大使馆那边给我的说法是:护照丢了就补护照,签证逾期了就去移民局补签、交罚款;ID锁了,下载不了“中国领事”,就找朋友、找家人帮忙;没钱就找家里。总的意思就是,这些问题他们都不管。 所以,在柬的兄弟们如果想自首回国,就直接去大使馆对面的老地方,坐免费大巴去安置点就可以了,不用再去大使馆咨询。 #以下为频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 【X6宝马会】U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注:@X6YL ——————————————— 🔔 订阅频道:@svip40 ➡️ 投稿爆料:@bx617 😅
👍1
#群友投稿:昨日中秋,月缺处见圆满。 翻阅旧信,方知那位带我于东南亚立足的大哥,曾于二四年中秋邀我归园区共膳。彼时我于酒店酣睡,错过了这最后的相聚。禅宗有云,失之东隅,收之桑榆,然此际桑榆已远,唯余怅惘。 忆往昔,我乃大哥于老挝水牢中斥资十二万赎回之人。随其在大其力敲击键盘半载,后大其里遭扫荡,迁至亚太之#鸿图。三月之内,无欲打破阶级,发展代理。 初入集团人事,两月间得数十万,此乃意料之外之喜。后归大哥麾下,不再敲键,转而经营代理,竟发现此路比敲键更为顺畅。半年光景,存款逾二百余万。 于亚太购得一辆车,在那时最黑之园区,持蓝色狗推牌,出入自如,想必鸿图之中,唯我一人享有此等自由。 彼时年仅21,自感已从被买之猪仔蜕变为如今模样,遂搬出园区,栖身酒店。夜夜召越南女子相伴,后其返越,为我诞下一子。 因居园区外,结识各方人物,于阿波罗、交克、东美等黑园区间穿梭。在东美两月,又得百万。闲暇时赴泰国游历。 公司中几个广西杂种…
柬埔寨监狱关押了数千名电诈人员 截至9月18日,柬埔寨共有4834人因涉及网络诈骗案件被羁押在全国23所监狱和改造中心,其中491人为柬埔寨人,4343人为外国人,涉及27个国籍。 人数最多的是柴桢省监狱,其次为西港、卜迭棉芷、第一改造中心和国公省监狱。 其中4168人已被检方正式指控,441人正在接受司法调查,194人已获判但判决尚未生效,另有31人判决已经生效。与此同时,77名国家警察因涉及电诈受到纪律处分,涉嫌刑事犯罪者则被移送法院处理。 #以下为频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 【X6宝马会】U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注:@X6YL ——————————————— 🔔 订阅频道:@svip40 ➡️ 投稿爆料:@bx617 😅
#群友爆料:缅甸三佛塔园区黑幕曝光最新消息,坐标:北纬 15.47331,东经 98.28373。 园区内几十家公司,十几栋楼,每栋楼3层。涉事888公司,老板都是中国人。园区主管“大炮”,二老板“三喜”,里面不少打手和管理层还吸DU。 这个园区之前就被曝光过很多次,但暴行一点没变。被骗过来的人全部被非法关押、殴打、电击、小黑屋、水牢、关兵站、塞进狗笼,往笼子里放毒蛇都是家常便饭。 男的一送进去先挨打,先来个下马威。还会给受害者看酷刑、伤人致死的视频,用来吓唬人。 园区门口有持枪大兵二十四小时轮流看守,根本无法逃脱。当地武装和园区利益牵扯甚广,不敢让人逃跑。 长得好看的女生,会被送到园区会所被逼卖淫;普通样貌的女生,和男生一样,被逼做电信诈骗敲键盘。只要稍微敢反抗,就会遭受各种暴力虐待。 很多被困的人被折磨到身体垮掉、精神失常。 这里的残忍程度不亚于当年的KK园区。恳请国际反诈联盟、国际刑警,还有中缅泰相关官方关注…
👍1
#群友投稿:本总,23年跟你做卡盘的时候,你还欠的工资,现在也不多了,也就一千多。 不知道是不是你不打算给了,一直问。当时的公司也是赚钱的,预支你几万U、几万U预支,后面资方不合作了,你欠下的工资都拖了这么久了,三年了。 这段时间,你我向别人打听你的情况,在包厢里面吸DU狂欢,世界杯也有钱去赌,这点工资为什么就能拖这么久呢?大头照就不发了,希望你马上处理! #以下为频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 【X6宝马会】U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注:@X6YL ——————————————— 🔔 订阅频道:@svip40 ➡️ 投稿爆料:@bx617 😅
https://t.me/visa888
#马来西亚资讯:62岁女子被骗逾18.7万美金,子谎称可协助申请新加坡永久居民身份 一名62岁的马来西亚女子疑遭诈骗集团诱骗,以办理新加坡永久居民身份为名,先后被骗走762,700令吉(约18.7万美元)。 柔佛州新山南区警区主任阿兹鲁·希沙姆·莫哈末·沙菲在9月23日发表声明证实此案。据《海峡时报》报道,受害者于2025年12月首次在脸书(Facebook)看到一则声称可提供移民协助的广告,随后拨打广告中列出的新加坡电话号码。 她之后与一名自称能够协助办理相关手续的人士联系。对方起初声称申请费用只需300新元(约236美元),但随后不断以各种理由要求她支付更多款项。 警方表示,受害者在5月5日至8月31日期间,先后进行了123次转账,将个人积蓄汇入多个由嫌疑人提供的银行账户,累计金额达762,700令吉。 由于对方持续索要款项,受害者最终产生怀疑,并意识到自己可能受骗,随后向警方报案。 警方调查相关银行账户后,证实…
👍1
#付费广告 🔥 马尼拉烟火气,透明厨房,小海鲜,鲜货烧烤,在马尼拉也能吃到这么够味的云贵川/江西菜🔥大排档 ✅ 石斑烤鱼,麻辣小龙虾🦞,炭火鲜货烧烤🍖、烤澳洲小羊排🐑,烤蚱蜢,奶香牛油,活珠子🥚道道都是下酒神器。 热辣烟火,氛围感直接拉满,来菲律宾旅游/本地干饭党,闭眼冲不踩雷! 本店一楼大厅可以堂食,外卖打包,二楼有包厢,生日聚会商务宴请都可以提前预定。 📍 地址定位:136 Talisay st corner yakal st San Antonio village makati city 菲律宾唯一一家8年中国餐厅(你值得一试) 飞机客服:@laxiaoxian8888
西港宁波酒店一名受害女子已被警方成功救出。 据悉,案件主谋在警方行动前逃离现场,仅留下一名柬埔寨男子负责看管受害女子。目前,该名负责看管的柬埔寨男子已被警方逮捕。 案件后续情况仍在进一步调查中。 #以下为频道广告赞助商 ——————————————— 【X6宝马会】U存U取 首存送16666U 返水1.3%起 飞机投注:@X6YL ——————————————— 🔔 订阅频道:@svip40 ➡️ 投稿爆料:@bx617 😅
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,200 posts we hold for @svip40. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ai038 · 1,997681 posts【球速体育】官方频道
@tz228 · 7,048681 posts182体育-官方频道
@TY_182 · 2,559673 posts6U.com|客服中心
@PG6U_com · 65025 posts6U.com|保证金查验教程
@WWW_6Ucom · 19225 posts九博国际 · 公群导航
@jbgj · 16,91421 posts🏆九博国际@JBGJ🏆上下分群 总押900万美金
@jiubovip · 8,71921 posts新葡京|PG电子|麻将糊了|赏金女王
@CH2o49 · 2,52414 posts新葡京集团-官方频道
@xpj533 · 1,75914 posts8K国际官方
@PG8K8K · 3,73812 posts一元云购 · VIP交流群
@yyygjlq · 3,00911 posts一元云购 · 官方导航
@yyygpd · 4,06111 posts种瓜吃瓜|瓜农日记🍉
@chigua18881 · 1,6234 posts182体育官方频道
@ty182svip · 21,3544 posts东南亚大事件
@bx666 · 467,8451 post每日吃瓜-搞笑段子
@sosochiguadty · 48,2621 postSpam Info Bot
@SpamBot · 35,581,5151 post头条事件
@toutiaoshijian · 74,8841 post阿才 机票 签证 旅行证 回国交流群
@visa888 · 2,0661 postX6宝马会-官方频道
@x6x6 · 12,8441 post东南亚大事件-聚焦热点
@xw1836 · 100,4951 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@toutiaoshijian · 74,884#1
@feilongwang · 92,276#2
@bx666 · 467,845#3
@MB_149 · 121,941#4
@cctvPH · 190,942#5
@redian3 · 60,292#6
@bg833 · 291,863#7
@JD_9Dynasty · 8,093#8
@flb00 · 17,692#9
@qqdsj · 196,784#10
@SB919 · 139,268#11
@baoguangee · 179,272#12
@anwei2 · 34,725#13
@jinritoutiao6 · 36,265 (as read 17 August 2026)#14
@bodutt · 39,340#15
@usedcarDaxi · 3,333#16
@tiyu_3 · 92,110#17
@miqizufang · 1,544#18
@bmhvip · 10,216#19
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 16,900#20
@dk789 · 101,276#21
@dalou37 · 953#22
@dashijian01 · 38,614#23
@dubai0 · 77,364#24
@phnews · 14,671#25
@ZLWBG · 93,087#26
@vip35r · 47,471#27
@DNYXW008 · 79,700#28
@baoguang_g · 52,228#29
@tg04277 · 33,845#30
@AnWei08 · 52,278#31
@shorezufang · 1,417#32
@uuu8u · 48,641#33
@lufa61888 · 3,053#34
@HRZelda · 7,345#35
@jianghehaocheng123 · 988#36
@DEXINQIANBIDUIHUAN · 2,325#37
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AnWei08 · 52,278
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 24 August 2026
@dk789 · 101,276
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 24 August 2026
@redian3 · 60,292
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 23 August 2026
@cggx33 · 51,582
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
@toutiaoshijian · 74,884
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 18 August 2026
@TRJ668899 · 44,812
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 August 2026
@pdsss · 54,442
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
@bvl222 · 45,237
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
@tg04277 · 33,845
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
@bodutt · 39,340
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026
@rdzx0 · 108,708
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@feilongwang · 92,276
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 18 August 2026
@XMZPK · 86,448
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026
@MB_149 · 121,941
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 August 2026
@quanwangbaoguang0 · 145,969
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@f_kbg · 150,008
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 14 August 2026
@SB919 · 139,268
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@DNYXW008 · 79,700
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@QWHRBGB · 198,448
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 August 2026
@baoguangee · 179,272
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 11 August 2026
@qqdsj · 196,784
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 11 August 2026
@cctvPH · 190,942
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 11 August 2026
@bg833 · 291,863
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 10 August 2026
@HR8877 · 317,999
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 175 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚华人情报站” (@svip40), 110,383 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svip40.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.