Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 吃瓜搞笑段子🍉

Channel

吃瓜搞笑段子🍉

@gaoxiaochigua8

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

64,995subscribers

+11,416 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001471803128
TypeChannel
Username@gaoxiaochigua8
Description每日更新 吃瓜,搞笑 视频。 商务合作: @xuancc1
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gaoxiaochigua8

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

50,93767,50859,222.57 August 2026 — 53,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,579 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,217 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,945 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,263 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,834 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,732 subscribers13 August 2026 — 53,421 subscribers14 August 2026 — 53,131 subscribers16 August 2026 — 52,539 subscribers17 August 2026 — 52,132 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,638 subscribers19 August 2026 — 51,376 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,179 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,937 subscribers22 August 2026 — 53,374 subscribers24 August 2026 — 52,806 subscribers25 August 2026 — 55,910 subscribers26 August 2026 — 62,356 subscribers27 August 2026 — 62,203 subscribers28 August 2026 — 61,866 subscribers29 August 2026 — 61,339 subscribers30 August 2026 — 63,700 subscribers31 August 2026 — 63,485 subscribers1 September 2026 — 63,060 subscribers2 September 2026 — 67,508 subscribers3 September 2026 — 66,831 subscribers5 September 2026 — 66,061 subscribers8 September 2026 — 66,777 subscribers11 September 2026 — 65,214 subscribers13 September 2026 — 66,240 subscribers14 September 2026 — 63,987 subscribers16 September 2026 — 66,168 subscribers19 September 2026 — 64,995 subscribers64,9957 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +11,416. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,451–69,994 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:5664,995-1,173
16 Sept 2026, 21:3766,168+2,181
14 Sept 2026, 20:5963,987-2,253
13 Sept 2026, 05:4166,240+1,026
11 Sept 2026, 08:4065,214-1,563
8 Sept 2026, 15:3866,777+716
5 Sept 2026, 07:1866,061-770
3 Sept 2026, 13:5866,831-677
2 Sept 2026, 07:3367,508+4,448
1 Sept 2026, 05:1363,060-425
31 Aug 2026, 05:0863,485-215
30 Aug 2026, 07:2663,700+2,361
29 Aug 2026, 07:0461,339-527
28 Aug 2026, 09:2561,866-337
27 Aug 2026, 12:1462,203-153
26 Aug 2026, 15:0862,356+6,446
25 Aug 2026, 17:3255,910+3,104
24 Aug 2026, 16:3352,806-568
22 Aug 2026, 22:3853,374+2,437
21 Aug 2026, 12:0250,937first reading

Engagement

547 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.39%
avg views ÷ 64,995 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,850
353 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.919%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
353
of 547 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 323 of 353 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held547 (7 August 202623 September 2026)
Views total1,007,030
Reactions total8,320
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 03:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
15,300
Videos
17,900
Links
914

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 17m
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 387 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,598 reactions across 471 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,54233.4%
🔥3,45532.6%
3,45132.6%
💩860.811%
👏180.17%
👎150.142%
😍110.104%
🤣70.066%
🥰60.057%
💯20.019%
🙏20.019%
👀10.009%
😭10.009%
🤡10.009%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 471 of the 547 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 547 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 15:10 UTC≈5,550 views20 reactionsread 24 September 2026

吃瓜曝光👉 @TGbg1688

👍11🔥62👎1

23 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈5,140 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

#付费广告 球速真人盘 ❗️大额出款无忧❗️ 东南亚顶流线上博彩平台👍👍👍👍 球速体育2023年在东南亚大事件上押500000USDT押金 #东南亚顶级高爆电子台!😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 😀😳😳 😀😀😀😀 👌👌👌 USDT存出款,东南亚盘总首选U台👍 不限ip 提款无上限! 球速大会员再创新高: 东南亚某位幸运玩家 连续盈利出款五天总计4450万 (战绩可查) 球速体育18年老品牌台子 0风控 ❗️0审核 ❗️包出款❗️ 硬核福利🆘 💎充1000 送300📌 💎充3000送500📌 🔔福利频道: @PG1814 ♾ ✅客服专员: @xixiwct 🥹 ✅注册网址: qs1814.cc ✅

6👍5🔥3👎1

23 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈5,390 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

人人都有第一次,虽老仍在

👍6🔥54

23 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC≈5,080 views11 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

一只肌肉发达的猫在伊斯坦布尔的街道上展示自己的肌肉。

👍53🔥3

23 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC≈5,360 views17 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

女同磨豆腐的快感应该是毛茬扎的吧

🔥8👍54

23 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC68 views19 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

广东省佛山市顺德区北滘镇人昌路3号美的新都荟广场F1

9🔥6👍4

23 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC69 views13 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

真的有“UFO”吗?! 9月23日, 四川成都都江堰。多位市民拍到不明飞行物。该飞行物形似飞艇,在阳光照耀下呈白色透明状。 气象部门回应:非气象探空气球。。。成都施放探空气球只有温江国家气候观象台,而且是在规定的时间施放。。。

🔥73👍3

23 Sept 2026, 14:58 UTC64 views13 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

FTNN新闻:赖清德日前视察陆军无人系统训练指挥部时,被发现现场展示的无人机竟然是中国国内的农业植保机品牌翼飞特 EFT X6100 无人机,搭配的是农业植保机常用的云卓科技 Skydroid H12 Pro 遥控器。 早在 2022 年时,台湾“原资”品牌无人机使用的就是 Skydroid H12 无人机遥控器,后来厂商发布视频时,同款外型的遥控器却已贴上不同品牌。 对此台军陆军驳斥表示,相关说法与事实不符,强调这批无人机由“原资系统整合”中标,交付品牌为“原资 Rdata”、型号“iRotor-1000”,厂商提出的原产地及出厂证明也写明产地为台湾。

6🔥4👍3

23 Sept 2026, 14:58 UTC65 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

外卖骑手到店取餐遭区别对待! 骑手进店后,餐还没做好,坐在店内空椅子上等候时,被一名男店员告知:说这里你不能坐。 小哥疑惑:椅子明明是空的,为什么不能坐?一旁的衬衣男直言:空着也不是给你坐的! 目前该店铺被网友翻出,差评不断

10👍4🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 547 posts we hold for @gaoxiaochigua8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“吃瓜搞笑段子🍉” (@gaoxiaochigua8), 64,995 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gaoxiaochigua8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.