刷到一个频道后,通常还想找更多同类入口。 SOSO 精选频道会随机推荐一批已收录频道。 适合继续发现相近内容。
😁30❤24🎉23👍21🔥19

Channel
@qqt13
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
202,972subscribers
-1,419 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001836322825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qqt13 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qqt13 |
Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:39 | 202,972 | -1,368 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 204,340 | -2,860 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 207,200 | +8,177 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 199,023 | -1,990 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 201,013 | -3,013 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 204,026 | -365 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 204,391 | first reading |
143 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 135 of 143 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 143 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 40,409 |
| Reactions total | 15,559 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15,559 reactions across 135 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 3,145 | 20.2% | |
| 🎉 | 3,122 | 20.1% | |
| ❤ | 3,110 | 20.0% | |
| 😁 | 3,089 | 19.9% | |
| 👍 | 3,085 | 19.8% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.026% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.013% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.006% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.006% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 143 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,559reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 143 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
刷到一个频道后,通常还想找更多同类入口。 SOSO 精选频道会随机推荐一批已收录频道。 适合继续发现相近内容。
😁30❤24🎉23👍21🔥19
🆕柬-西港-斯里兰卡-菲卡加延-迪--泰国5国直招📣 中亚体育 🤑🙏😂✊😭👏😱😅 柬-西港 《 推广专员 》10000-12000 体育老手12000起 天推转化 部门提供资源 提点丰厚 面试好过 😊🇰🇭 柬-西港 《 招聘组长 》15000-18000 提成多多📳柬🇰🇭 斯里兰卡-科伦坡 《联运专员 》 10000-12000 提点丰厚 面试好过 10小时月休4 📳🇱🇰 菲律宾-卡加延《客服维护 》13000+小组流水提成 9小时月休4先入职泰国过度-后期去菲 😇🇱🇰泰兰德~ 泰-芭提雅《 天推转化 》 居家办公 10000-12000 包住不包吃 完成业绩任务指标享受餐补房补🫠🇹🇭 以上岗位均可外宿,大量招工 联系人📱:@hrjiahui666 🤑大量岗位要人😱😅 ➡业绩岗,职能岗,半职能岗,技术岗⬅ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵🫵 ➖➖➖➖➖➖…
👍32🎉26😁21❤19🔥17
🆘【万里赴缅:数千非洲人如何进入妙瓦底诈骗园区?】🆘 近年来,位于泰缅边境地区的诈骗产业持续受到国际关注。其中,一个长期存在的疑问逐渐浮出水面:大量来自非洲多个国家的人员,是如何跨越近万公里,最终进入缅甸妙瓦底一带的诈骗园区? 据当地相关信息显示,妙瓦底以及泰国来兴府湄索县、朴帕县沿莫艾河一带的部分诈骗窝点内,曾出现大量非洲国家人员身影。这些人员来源涉及多个国家,其中部分人声称是受到高薪工作招聘吸引,自愿前往;也有人表示遭遇虚假招聘、欺骗甚至人口贩卖,最终被困诈骗园区。 据了解,部分人员的跨境路线十分复杂。他们可能从非洲多个国家出发,经航空交通抵达东南亚,再进入泰国境内,随后前往泰缅边境地区,最终通过非正规渠道进入缅甸妙瓦底相关区域。 这一过程中,多个环节引发外界关注。 首先,在入境环节,大量人员需要办理泰国签证并留下相关资料。如果背后存在中介或组织协助办理,那么签证申请材料、代理机构以及相关人员是否能够被追踪,成为调…
🎉31❤26🔥20👍19😁18
🆘【雅典娜案反转 警方澄清,并没有任何警方公布雅典娜已遇害】🆘 “近日,有关百万粉丝网红“雅典娜Liya”(本名孔丽梅)确认遇害的消息在网络流传,引发广泛关注。 2026年8月11日,宁波公安对此传闻作出官方回应,澄清了案件归属及关键信息的来源,强调并未证实该网红已遇害。
🔥36👍26😁19❤16🎉11
🆘【克伦邦再曝69英亩新诈骗园区 关联克伦民族军首领之子】🆘 缅甸媒体8月10日发布调查,在克伦邦帕因觉镇一带发现一处新建诈骗园区,位置在梅拉瓦迪新村约1英里外,占地超过69英亩。 调查人员将现场视频和卫星影像进行比对,园区位置、建筑布局等特征基本吻合。卫星记录显示,这片区域从2025年12月开始大规模施工,与今年1月曝光的玉龙湾园区并非同一处。 调查显示,这处园区与克伦民族军首领索奇督的儿子索奇奇有关。索奇奇现任克伦民族军第999战术指挥部副指挥官。 一名前工作人员提供的信息显示,园区使用星链卫星网络和发电机维持运作,内部开展针对美国人的网络诈骗业务,工作人员外出受到限制。 今年1月曝光的玉龙湾园区位于妙瓦底一带,早在2020年就开始建设,当时关联的是索奇督另一名儿子索图埃穆。此次新园区的地点、建设时间和关联人物均不相同。 美国财政部此前已对克伦民族军、索奇督以及他的两个儿子索图埃穆和索奇奇实施制裁。相关制裁内容涉…
❤27🔥27🎉23👍19😁19
商务负责人 工作地点: 马尼拉 国籍要求: 不限 性别: 男女不限 薪资: OPEN + 提成 岗位要求: 1. 3年以上 BC 行业经验,了解包网、体育行业;具备推广、代理、运营其中一方面经验 2. iGaming 领域具备成熟 BD、销售或合作伙伴关系管理经验,具备中英文沟通与谈判能力 3. 具备国际化视野,可接受出差;有10人团队管理经验,欢迎菲律宾、柬埔寨、迪拜、台湾等盘口和公司背景 岗位描述: 1. 负责公司整体商务合作与业务拓展,推动合作落地,实现业务增长与商业目标 2. 制定商务拓展策略,拓展并维护客户及合作伙伴,主导商务谈判与合同签署 3. 协调内部资源推进项目执行,复盘合作效果并持续优化策略 🇦🇪🇹🇼🇦🇪🇹🇼🇦🇪🇹🇼🇦🇪🇹🇼🇦🇪🇹🇼🇦🇪🇹🇼 公关经理 一、人物画像 1. 工作地点:马尼拉、曼谷 2. 年龄:35岁以下 3. 身高:女,165及以上,男,175及以上 4. 国籍不限 5. 中英流利,条理…
🎉33😁23🔥21❤20👍15
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚吃瓜悬赏令 📢 东南亚新闻吃瓜(世界杯) 📢 东南亚华人事件曝光 📢 缅北老街吃瓜中心 📢 东南亚缅北新闻曝光电子 📢 东南亚DJ俱乐部 📢 东南亚新事件-新闻.曝光 📢 东南亚时报|柬埔寨大事件|爆料|吃瓜 📢 东南亚全网大曝光(曝光) 📢 东南亚黑料网-曝光新闻 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口:@sooo
❤28🔥28🎉27😁20👍12
🆘【台湾省硬核抓铺诈骗犯实拍视频 带枪抓铺 敢有反抗可直接击毙 对待诈骗犯 绝不手软】🆘
🎉27😁26👍24🔥24❤17
🆘【数万电诈人员回流柬埔寨?】🆘 据报道,最近有不少灰产人员回流柬埔寨,包括从马来西亚、缅甸等地返回柬埔寨的人员。另据官方数据,最近有10万名中国人入境柬埔寨。 有媒体援引柬埔寨移民总局局长宋斯威那公布的数据称,自免签政策以来至8月2日,已经有超过10万名中国人入境柬埔寨。其中4.45万人左右是以旅游目的免签入境,其余超过5.55万人持商务签等其他类型签证入境。 据柬媒报道,多名中资酒店餐饮、中介从业者表示最近有部分灰产从业者回流柬埔寨。其中有些是因为缅甸、老挝严打电诈返回柬埔寨,有些是因为马来西亚、泰国等地签证问题返回。 “虽然柬埔寨的打击动作很大,但一些盘口还是决定硬上。” 从今年1月太子集团陈志被抓以来,柬埔寨严打电诈,不少电诈等灰产人员转移到缅甸、老挝、马来西亚、越南等地。 但近日来这些国家打击电诈的力度也在加大。据社交媒体消息称,越南胡志明市的警察也已经开始挨家挨户敲门检查护照,老挝金三角特外地区也迎来地毯…
❤26😁26🔥23🎉21👍20
🆘【华人加密币大亨在巴拉圭全裸坠亡,身价超20亿美元】🆘 8月7日凌晨,华人加密货币投资人叶俊德(Harry Chun Tak Yeh)在巴拉圭首都亚松森的豪华公寓楼外身亡。 当地警方初步认定其从约30层高楼处坠落,遗体全裸,被黑色塑料袋覆盖。 检方正就意外、自杀或他杀等多方向展开调查,尸检结果尚未公布。加密货币圈有人猜测原因可能是抢劫加密货币。 公开资料显示,叶俊德出生于中国香港,童年移居加拿大,常被描述为加拿大籍华人加密货币投资者。2013年比特币价格仅为60美元时,他进入加密货币市场抄底,由此积累了巨额财富。其个人官网称,叶俊德本人及合作伙伴管理的资产超过20亿美元。
👍27🎉26❤24🔥21😁18
🆘【群友投稿:我是一名在柬埔寨待了两年的推推】🆘 当初也是听朋友说:来这边只要不赌、不吸DU,老老实实干,肯定能赚到钱。这两年下来,DU我确实没碰,赌场也就去过一次。那次输了1000美金,从那以后再也没进去过。 按理说,不赌不DU,怎么着也该存点钱吧?结果干了几年,到现在一看,存款一分钱没存下来😂 问题出在哪? 他妈的,就出在我干的是股票盘。天天跟股票打交道,搞了两年以后,我甚至产生了一种错觉:我寻思自己就算不是什么华尔街之狼,好歹也算半个股票高手了吧? 于是把这几年辛辛苦苦赚来的钱拿去投资,结果股票还没怎么玩,我又看上了比特币。买的时候觉得自己是在投资未来,亏的时候才发现,未来可能压根没打算带上我。 也是因为特码的特朗普天天几把搞事,让我亏得嗷嗷叫。现在回头一看,真挺有意思的,几年辛辛苦苦赚来的钱,兜兜转转,最后又还给特朗普了。 所以也奉劝各位一句:赚到钱以后,存钱就好好存,不存钱就好好玩,最起码能快活。像我,钱…
🆘【中国24岁女子泰国失联 疑被拐卖至缅甸电诈园区】🆘 拥有3000万粉丝的网红“陈泽”爆料,中国24岁女子祁萌与网友前往东南亚旅游后失联。 据悉,祁萌于8月2日自吉隆坡飞抵曼谷,在登上声称开往清迈的车辆后便失去联系,疑遭转卖至缅甸妙瓦底电诈园区。 消息在网络引发广泛关注,祁萌好友在网上发布寻人启事并希望联系绑匪协商赎金。
❤29🎉24👍23😁20🔥19
Showing the 12 most recent of 143 posts we hold for @qqt13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 247,933 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚔️吃瓜曝光《缅北缅甸泰国》” (@qqt13), 202,972 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qqt13.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.