🚨 U.S. INFLATION EXPECTATIONS SE UPAR! 🇺🇸 • 📊 Core CPI 0.3% MoM raha, jabki expectation 0.2% thi. • 🔥 Headline CPI bhi 0.4% MoM aaya, vs 0.3% expected. • ⚠️ Core CPI ka 0.3% figure Fed Governor Waller ke us level par hai, jahan December mein 50 bps rate hike consider ki ja sakti hai. • 📉 Rate hike ki chances badhne par Stocks aur Crypto par pressure aa sakta hai. • 👀 Ab dekhna hoga ki weakness sirf Tech Stocks aur B…

Channel
Cryptovel
@ytcryptovel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,275subscribers
-1,708 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001312261638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ytcryptovel |
| Description | Telegram DM: @CryptoVel Email: [email protected] YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CryptoVel Twitter (New) : https://x.com/cryptovelps -Posts are not financial advise |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ytcryptovel |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 02:56 | 9,275 | -57 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:39 | 9,332 | -29 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:49 | 9,361 | -58 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 9,419 | -69 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 9,488 | -48 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:08 | 9,536 | -55 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 9,591 | -60 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 9,651 | -68 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 03:51 | 9,719 | -72 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 9,791 | -81 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 9,872 | -135 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 10,007 | -108 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 10,115 | -25 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 10,140 | -43 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 10,183 | -29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 10,212 | -22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 10,234 | -56 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 10,290 | -69 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 10,359 | -35 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:53 | 10,394 | first reading |
Engagement
225 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.44%
- avg views ÷ 9,275 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 226
- 62 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 62
- of 225 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 225 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 14,038 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,180
- Videos
- ≈321
- Links
- ≈5,980
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7m 29s
- Average length
- 1m 04s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 62 posts held from the last 30 days (1.61%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Binance warns an iOS flaw could expose wallet seed phrases, private keys and logins stored in app files. The flaw "worse_query" lets malicious apps read other apps’ files on iOS 26.7.1, 27.0.1 and 27.2. Stay safe: Update iOS and remove apps from untrusted sources.
$13T Charles Schwab adds trading for Solana , Avalanche and Chainlink
again some new prediction come for 2026-2027 mid for bitcoin prices
Good Morning ☀️😎 “CRYPTO TRILLIONAIRES” 💸💰
🚨 BITCOIN DEEPLY UNDERVALUED? $145K POWER-LAW TARGET! 📈 • ₿ Bitcoin abhi $75.6K par trade kar raha hai. • 📊 Long-term Power-Law trend ke according value ~$145K hai. • 🔥 Matlab BTC apne structural trend se lagbhag 48% discount par hai. • ⏳ Short-term movements noise ho sakte hain, lekin 1-year horizon par model ne random walk se ~47% better forecasting performance dikhayi. • 🚀 2–3 years ke horizon par historical adva…
🚨 CARDANO'S MIDNIGHT BUILDING POWERFUL DATA INFRASTRUCTURE! 🌐 • 🔵 Charles Hoskinson ke according, Midnight apni data infrastructure ke liye Celestia aur Filecoin ka use karega. • 📊 Celestia data availability handle karega. • 💾 Filecoin long-term data storage aur archival ka kaam sambhalega. • 🔗 Isse Midnight ko dedicated data distribution aur preservation infrastructure milega. • 🚀 Ye partnership blockchain ecosyste…
🚨 BITCOIN BULLISH SIGNAL? $300K TARGET INCOMING? 📈 • 📊 Major correction ke baad BTC ne finally apna 30-Week Moving Average reclaim kar liya hai. • 🔍 History mein aise 4 instances aaye, jahan reclaim ke baad 4 consecutive red weekly candles bani thi. • ⚠️ Ab BTC 5th consecutive red weekly candle ki taraf badh raha hai — jo pehle kabhi nahi hua! • 🚀 Pichhle 4 cases mein average maximum gain 316% within 266 days raha. …
Good Morning ☀️😎 “CRYPTO TRILLIONAIRES” 💸💰
🚀 NEW VIDEO IS LIVE! 🔥 Altseason 2026 or 2027? ED Raid on CoinDCX & Delta Exchange | Funds Safe? 🎥 Watch now 👉 https://youtu.be/p_E0FKTypKo #Altseason2026 #Altseason2027 #CoinDCX #DeltaExchange #Bitcoin #CryptoIndia #EDRaid #Altcoins #FEMA
Good Morning ☀️😎 “CRYPTO TRILLIONAIRES” 💸💰
🚀 NEW VIDEO IS LIVE! 🔥 OneKey App : Swap USDT to USDC With 0 Swap Fees? Gas Fee Explained! 🎥 Watch now 👉 https://youtu.be/rVwnHcX2lnU Download OneKey App Here : - https://app.onekey.so/r/PNZIAG/app/perps #OneKeyWallet #OneKeyApp #USDT #USDC #CryptoWallet #CryptoSwap #GasSponsorship #SelfCustody #Stablecoins #web3
Showing the 12 most recent of 225 posts we hold for @ytcryptovel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptoPointHi · 28,889
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
@bitcoinexpertindia · 37,650
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@wiseadvicebysumit · 162,876
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@deltaexchangeyoutube · 22,482
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
@OfficiaLCryptoindia · 56,906
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 88,373
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@cryptoNotesMohsin · 49,388
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@Guideratul · 57,751
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
@EarnWithSapna · 47,491
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@pushpendrasinghofficial · 91,142
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
@Crypto_HOLDwithPriyank · 30,082
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
@SmartViewAI · 44,495
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
@open4profit · 76,689
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@cryptojargon69 · 35,727
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptovel” (@ytcryptovel), 9,275 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ytcryptovel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.