Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Richard Temple

Channel

Richard Temple

@CryptoRichard

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,767subscribers

-892 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001412823634
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoRichard
DescriptionTA | Market Thoughts Owner: @Richardily Twitter: https://twitter.com/Temple_Crypto
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoRichard

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@kimoncrypto/787417 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC@CryptoRichard/4219 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@kimoncrypto/787718 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC@CryptoRichard/4220 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@kimoncrypto/790021 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC@CryptoRichard/4223 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoRichard/4225 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC@kimoncrypto/790423 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC1.00under a minute
@kimoncrypto/80374 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC@CryptoRichard/4269 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoRichard/4219 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC@CryptoKlondike/1260018 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC1.0024 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kimoncrypto5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@kimoncrypto (3–2)
@CryptoKlondike5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@CryptoKlondike (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 52 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,76713,65913,2136 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net -892. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,633–13,793 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 20:4112,767-16
8 Nov 2026, 09:4612,783-8
7 Nov 2026, 03:4712,791-11
6 Nov 2026, 00:5012,802-4
5 Nov 2026, 00:4412,806-6
4 Nov 2026, 01:4012,812-7
3 Nov 2026, 02:3112,819-1
2 Nov 2026, 06:0612,820-47
1 Nov 2026, 04:2712,867-76
31 Oct 2026, 01:1112,943-79
29 Oct 2026, 22:2813,022-10
29 Oct 2026, 01:4013,032-11
28 Oct 2026, 00:5913,043-16
26 Oct 2026, 23:4613,059-17
25 Oct 2026, 22:5113,076-13
25 Oct 2026, 01:2813,089-19
23 Oct 2026, 21:5913,108-15
22 Oct 2026, 22:3113,123-15
21 Oct 2026, 17:0013,138-14
20 Oct 2026, 13:5913,152first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 12,767 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held80 (17 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total60,700
Reactions total809
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,610
Videos
≈38
Links
≈2,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,784 reactions across 80 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤92651.9%
❤‍🔥84447.3%
💔140.785%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,784 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 80 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoRichard. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (5.71%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,420 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💳 #ETH You were warned.

❤‍🔥15❤11

10 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,420 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💰 $ZEC It is happening.

❤12❤‍🔥9

10 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,530 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💰 $ZEC Colleagues, we should all pray for this setup. No shorting, just chasing the best entry possible.

❤‍🔥11❤10

9 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,530 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026

✅ COPY-TRADING CHALLENGE STARTS TOMORROW! If you are interested in participating — message me @Richardily. This is completely free of charge. Our goal — X3.

❤‍🔥10❤8

9 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC≈1,560 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🍁 #BTC Bitcoin is following the plan. Bids done their job. Time for a bounce on this week.

❤13❤‍🔥10

9 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,570 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💳 #ETH You were warned.

❤12❤‍🔥12

8 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,570 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

❗️COPY TRADING CHALLENGE (x3) STARTS IN 2 DAYS! Want to remind you — the last time we achieved 3.7x in 1 month of running the challenge. It was in August 2026. You can check it LIVE here. This time I am AIMING X3 as well. Will try to achieve this goal by the end of this year, but it always depends on the market too. There are two requirements: 1. Minimum deposit to start is $1000 2. You have to be my referral on B…

❤‍🔥13❤10

8 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,510 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🥇 $XAU Guys, I am still holding my short on Gold. The red thick level is a turn point for me. I do not think Gold will manage to break it up.

❤14❤‍🔥12

8 Nov 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,520 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📊 $NEAR Colleagues, I think correction on NEAR is almost over for now. This coin has finally found a solid support. I am taking this setup mainly because of the good RR. Added falling wedge on the chart for your liking.

❤17❤‍🔥10

7 Nov 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,540 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💵 My PnL over the past 30 days. Managed to achieve +45% PROFIT in a month. This is the reason I am launching a Copy-Trading Challenge — Trading Marathon where I try to X3 my deposit and you can auto-follow me. 👉 WE START FROM 10 NOVEMBER! You still have time to register, this is FREE. Message me @Richardily for details. Minimum deposit is $1000.

❤12❤‍🔥11💔1

7 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,570 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💻️ $NVDA The dump on Nvidia is over. Funds won’t let the $175 - $185 support be broken downwards. The best spot for buying is on the chart.

❤12❤‍🔥10💔2

6 Nov 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,680 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🍁 #BTC It is time to start bidding. My humble opinion. Zone: $73.5k - $76k (3%).

❤15❤‍🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @CryptoRichard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @CryptoRichard as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
20 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️
@CryptoKlondike · 56,825
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 170,635
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Kim & Crypto
@kimoncrypto · 35,318
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
100eyes Crypto Scanner (PREVIEW)
@CryptoScanner100eyes · 30,770
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 72,206
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Forex Tradings
@Forex_Tradings · 19,339
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Wall Street Crypto Trading
@Wallstreetcryptotrader · 88,373
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 182,610
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Backcom.io Global
@BackcomGlobal · 22,843
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Richard Temple” (@CryptoRichard), 12,767 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoRichard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.