Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СВИДЕТЕЛЬСТВА СОЦИАЛЬНОГО

Channel

СВИДЕТЕЛЬСТВА СОЦИАЛЬНОГО

@evidence_of_social

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

109subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002032042183
TypeChannel
Username@evidence_of_social
Description«Свидетельства социального» — это серия научно-практических семинаров. Каждый семинар будет посвящен методологическим проблемам сбора и обработки определенного типа свидетельств.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/evidence_of_social

Growth

1098 Aug 2026, 15:32 — 109 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:47 — 109 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:329 Aug 2026, 07:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 108–110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 07:47109no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:32109first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 7 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
40
Links
31

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2555.6%
🔥1226.7%
36.67%
👨‍💻24.44%
💅24.44%
12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 26 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Mar 2025, 08:51 UTC271 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Обсуждение статьи уже сегодня! Ссылка на видеовстречу: https://telemost.yandex.ru/j/91228801603632

👍2🔥2

Signed Artem

23 Mar 2025, 17:38 UTC288 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍71

Signed Tintin

23 Mar 2025, 17:38 UTC270 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мы продолжаем новый формат семинара – обсуждение черновика статьи. На этот раз текст Марии Старун посвящен половым преступлениям должностных лиц и их интерпретации советскими судами в межвоенный период. Является ли вымогательство секса за освобождение из-под ареста взяткой, злоупотреблением властью или изнасилованием? Если изнасилование могло интерпретироваться как нападение на советскую власть, как в случае «Чубар

🔥611👍1

Signed Tintin

13 Mar 2025, 13:16 UTC160 viewsread 9 August 2026

Мероприятие в духе нашего семинара.

Signed Artem

13 Mar 2025, 13:16 UTC249 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @USSResearchPhoto

ПРАВО НА КОСМОС: К НОВЫМ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИМ МИРАМ эпистемологический воркшоп (12 апреля 2025 года) Подобно тому, как Анри Лефевр провозгласил право горожанина на город, мы провозглашаем право исследователя, начинающего и не очень, на космос свободного научного поиска. Если вы в какой-то момент ощутили узость границ дисциплины (+шифра специализации, периода, архивного или библиотечного каталога, таблицы, строки, алф

🔥2💅1

Signed Artem

11 Mar 2025, 14:17 UTC128 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Использование машинного обучения в социо-гуманитарных исследованиях: опыт анализа наградных листов. Выходим из зимнего анабиоза и продолжаем наши встречи. В следующий раз предлагаем поговорить об использовании искусственного интеллекта. Несмотря на популярность новых инструментов, в наших дисциплинах их использование пока ограничено, а обсуждение проблем и возможностей ИИ ведется внутри более точных наук. Поводом для

👍4🔥2

Signed Artem

11 Mar 2025, 14:17 UTC132 viewsread 9 August 2026

Наша беседа об ИИ и социо-гуманитарном знании - уже сегодня. Ссылка в цитируемом посте. Будем рады всем онлайн!

Signed Artem

9 Mar 2025, 11:25 UTC162 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мы видим, что награды полагались за полученное ранение или побег из плена, но описание подвигов включает и другие, очевидно важные для определения вручаемой награды, детали. Ответственным за награждение предстояло определить, оценивать выше побег из концлагеря или тяжелое ранение, имеет ли значение как человек попал в плен, его звание и род войск, довоенная биография, место и продолжительность нахождения в плену и пр

👍31

Signed Artem

9 Mar 2025, 11:24 UTC130 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Награждение бывших в плену женщин На семинаре во вторник нашим свидетельством социального будут наградные листы. Нужно сказать, что о практиках награждения в военные и послевоенные годы мы знаем крайне мало. У каждой награды есть регламентирующие документы, но в них нельзя было учесть все возможные проявления доблести и героизма. Особенно если речь идет о военном плене. При Сталине к вернувшимся из плена ветеранам во

👍3💅1

Signed Artem

7 Mar 2025, 19:51 UTC307 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Использование машинного обучения в социо-гуманитарных исследованиях: опыт анализа наградных листов. Выходим из зимнего анабиоза и продолжаем наши встречи. В следующий раз предлагаем поговорить об использовании искусственного интеллекта. Несмотря на популярность новых инструментов, в наших дисциплинах их использование пока ограничено, а обсуждение проблем и возможностей ИИ ведется внутри более точных наук. Поводом для

👍5👨‍💻2

Signed Artem

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @evidence_of_social. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 833,471 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СВИДЕТЕЛЬСТВА СОЦИАЛЬНОГО” (@evidence_of_social), 109 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evidence_of_social.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.