Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 52 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,240–8,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 15:18
8,277
-5
17 Sept 2026, 04:19
8,282
+7
13 Sept 2026, 00:21
8,275
-13
9 Sept 2026, 09:20
8,288
+35
31 Aug 2026, 17:07
8,253
-7
28 Aug 2026, 13:26
8,260
+4
25 Aug 2026, 18:53
8,256
+4
23 Aug 2026, 00:55
8,252
-2
19 Aug 2026, 09:28
8,254
-6
16 Aug 2026, 03:36
8,260
-1
12 Aug 2026, 06:25
8,261
+3
9 Aug 2026, 14:14
8,258
+6
6 Aug 2026, 09:31
8,252
+6
6 Aug 2026, 03:03
8,246
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:07
8,246
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,249 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
581
46.5%
🔥
340
27.2%
❤
226
18.1%
❤🔥
45
3.60%
😱
33
2.64%
🙈
9
0.721%
🤡
5
0.4%
👀
4
0.32%
🎄
2
0.16%
👎
2
0.16%
🎃
1
0.08%
🤮
1
0.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 22 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lacewars. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 May 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, увидел в комментариях, что не все ещё адаптировались к новому формату постинга в телеге. Так вот, та часть текста статьи, что отображается в посте — это не вся статья целиком. Там ещё под "катом" есть продолжение. Нажимаете на "показать ещё" — и вам открывается весь текст статьи целиком. Понимаю, что не всем может быть удобен такой формат, но я сношал Телетайп во всех позах "Камасутры", потому что эта сволочь…
Не реклама, а рекомендация
На сайте дружественного издательства "Чёрная сотня" можно оформить предзаказ на ламповое здание книги Эрнеста Данлопа Суинтона "Оборона дурацкого брода" в переводе не менее дружественных братьев Нориных. Книга была написана более века назад, однако актуальности не растеряла. Посвящена она Англо-бурской войне (строго говоря - Второй англо-бурской, просто о первой мало кто знает), и представ…
#lacewars_мнение
Обычно я согласен с тем, что пишет Ларкин, но тут он ерунду какую-то прогнал. Согласно статье 128 ТК РФ работодатель обязан предоставить работнику отпуск без содержания сроком до 5 дней в случае утраты близкого родственника (дедушка под эту категорию попадает). При этом, сотрудник в праве сам выбирать срок отпуска в рамках этих пяти дней. Ему может быть достаточно и одного дня, и работодатель не име…
#lacewars_мнение
Бюрократический монстр размножается почкованием новых комиссий и комитетов))
Можно, а зачем? (с)
Мы ещё лет 20 назад пошли по пути "либерализации" школьного образования, постепенно урезая права учителя. Когда я заканчивал школу, ещё можно было ставить двойки, выгонять с уроков и, о ужас, не аттестовать за четверть или полугодие (и нерадивый школяр потом на каникулах ходил и сдавал все "хвосты"). Н…
#lacewars_Ликбез
Был такой австрийский император Фердинанд I, который в историю собственной страны вошёл преимущественно как тряпка и идиот. Отношение к нему - примерно такое же, как у наших красных - к Николаю II. Слабый и глупый правитель, чьи управленческие решения привели к революции, только в случае Фердинанда это было венгерское восстание 1848 года. Про Николая эти штампы более-менее разобраны, мой же пост - п…
🔥50❤19❤🔥7👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @lacewars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Загадки истории с Лысым Камрадом @popscienceru · 24,420 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
История и истории @historygothy · 20,829 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lace Wars | Историк Александр Свистунов” (@lacewars), 8,277 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lacewars.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
