Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Слудников

@sash2x

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,106subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001120170824
TypeChannel
Username@sash2x
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sash2x

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,400 average views per post against 1,106 subscribers — an engagement rate of 1029.5%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured11 of 11 published in the window (7 exact, 4 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled125,247
Mature posts only1130.6% over 10 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,106 measured 10 August 2026
Cohortb1000:rus · 54,164 channels · p10 5.33% · p25 10.5% · p50 20.1% · p75 35.6% · p90 57.1%
Position in cohort99.987th percentile · 51.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.348% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,0911,1061,098.57 August 2026 — 1,091 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,095 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,106 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,089–1,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:141,106+11
7 Aug 2026, 20:081,095+4
7 Aug 2026, 08:331,091first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1029.5%
avg views ÷ 1,106 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.163%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (8 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total125,247
Reactions total204
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

292 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15753.8%
🔥4615.8%
💯3512.0%
👍279.25%
😁155.14%
👏72.40%
🙏20.685%
🥰20.685%
👎10.342%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC206 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Летние трансферы «Реала» ⚽️ Мое мнение: • Ян Диоманде — 🔥 • Бернарду Силва — 🤷‍♂️ по мне так - староват • Марк Кукурелья — 🔥 • Ибраима Конате — 🙈 • Дензел Думфрис — 🔥 • Карлос Эспи — 🤷‍♂️ • Жозе Моуринью — 🙈 боюсь, что провалится Родри? Я не очень люблю, когда покупают возрастных полузащитников. Поэтому вообще не расстроюсь, если он перейдет в «Барсу». Кого еще надо докупить для Моура? Как думаете?

18💯5🔥2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC295 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ну, что? Кто сходил на «Одиссею» - делитесь впечатлениями 🗡️ Я офигел от (без спойлеров): 1) Звука (как сказал один уважаемый человек - звук здесь затмил операторскую работу) 2) ШАРЛИЗ ТЕРОН (какая же она, ну, вы понимаете)) 3) Аттракционов-испытаний Одиссея А так - фильм на 8/10

16🔥5👍1

31 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC545 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Еще из интересных ретро-картинок В 1958-м люди собирались, чтобы посмотреть выступление Хрущева. Прям как мы этим летом, только на матчи ЧМ) Нашел в USSResearch

11🔥5👍1

29 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC620 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Зацените, какие модульные дома собирали в 1960-е в Мытищах Пожили бы в таком? Нашел в USSResearch

10👏1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC662 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Моя киберпанковская душа ликует! ⛑️ Анонсировали сразу 2 прикольных сериала: • Blade Runner 2099 • Neuromancer Ждем 😀

6🔥1🥰1

24 Jul 2026, 08:45 UTC618 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А вы вообще в курсе, что в Иране есть советский город? • в 1973 году СССР построил там Арьяшахр - город для рабочих металлургического завода • самое интересное, что в то время Иран жестко корешил с США. А тут - совместный проект с Советским Союзом • почитайте, оч необычно Или зацените мой ролик. Там не Арьяшахр, но тоже интересно (про подземные города Ирана)

11👍2🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC≈115,000 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Американские стадионы – колхоз! По сравнению с тем, что обещает построить Саудовская Аравия для ЧМ-2034, уж точно. 1) The Roshn Stadium Какая-то неземная арена на 450 000 кв. метров (больше, чем Ватикан). 2) NEOM По идее, самый высокий стадион в мире (350 метров над землей). Изначально его хотели поставить на крыше города-линии The Line. Но из-за провала проекта (скорее всего) арену полностью переделают. 3) Ki

🔥175👎1👏1

19 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC≈2,020 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Испания доказала, что ЧМ можно выиграть без праймовых нападающих Лишь бы полузащита и Кубарси были в порядке 🇪🇸

💯287🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈2,400 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пишем новенькие Кодовые Имена ✍️

👍103😁3

15 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈2,350 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁124

12 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC≈2,370 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Жаль, конечно, этого добряка Но из всех сборных, за которые топили ребята с МЯЧа, у меня была самая лучшая 1) Сразу убираем за скобки явных фаворитов. Ну, какие Франция или Испания? Это же очевидно и неинтересно 2) Смотрим на сетку, группы и тех, кого выбила Норвегия 3) Они сыграли так, как и должны были. Дошли до 1/4 (как я и предсказывал) А если бы повезло - то могли и полуфинал зацепить Крутой подход к разви

30👏4💯2🙏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sash2x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Слудников” (@sash2x), 1,106 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sash2x.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.