Channel
@eco_ehsan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
899,495subscribers
+10,497 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001672739527 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eco_ehsan |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eco_ehsan |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 899,495 | +3,638 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 895,857 | +4,424 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 891,433 | -285 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 891,718 | +257 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 891,461 | +2,035 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 889,426 | -918 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 890,344 | +1,346 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 888,998 | first reading |
1,262 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 413 of 424 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,262 (9 March 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 124,144,400 |
| Reactions total | 1,575,644 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /83466 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC | 106 minutes – 8.3 hours old | 127,000 views ~2,397 reactions | 60 minutes: 64,900 → 3.0 hours: 95,100 → 6.0 hours: 109,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 59 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /83456 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC | 1816 minutes – 14 hours old | 191,000 views ~3,500 reactions | 60 minutes: 54,000 → 3.0 hours: 96,559 interp. → 6.0 hours: 134,000 → 12 hours: 183,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /83446 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC | 181.5 hours – 16 hours old | 203,000 views ~3,294 reactions | 3.0 hours: 112,000 → 6.0 hours: 148,000 → 12 hours: 196,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
324,230 reactions across 103 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 103,691 | 32.0% | |
| 👍 | 81,594 | 25.2% | |
| 😭 | 56,046 | 17.3% | |
| ❤ | 41,998 | 13.0% | |
| 👎 | 40,901 | 12.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 987 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,983,030reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه خبر اومده بنزین ۸۷ تومن شده چک کردم الان، دولت گفته مصرف بالای ۱۵۰ لیتر رو با نرخ چهارم (لیتری ۸۷ تومن) حساب میکنن از امشب تو کرمان آزمایشی شروع میشه و احتمالا به بقیه جاها هم میرسه @eco_ehsan
😭1,050👎305👍145😁100❤69
یه نشونه دیگه برای تشدید تنش اینکه آمریکا به سفارتخونههای خودش تو منطقه، گفته تعداد نیروها رو کم کنید
👍766😭310❤131😁85👎80
نیروهای آمریکایی دارن عراق رو به سمت ترکیه ترک میکنن خارج کردن نیروها از تیررس ایران نشون میده آمریکا داره برای تشدید تنش آماده میشه @eco_ehsan
👍1,230😭464❤137👎121😁82
جزئیات تورم آمریکا هم خوب بود احتمال افزایش نرخ بهره کمتر شده حالا اگه خبر سیاسی بدی نیاد، طلا و نقره جهانی میتونن بیشتر رشد کنن @eco_ehsan
❤1,080👍409😭88😁60👎55
آمار تورم آمریکا مطابق انتظار اومد (۲/۵ درصد) طلا جهانی دوباره یه بالا زد @eco_ehsan
👍955❤303😭126😁84👎59
آمار سال ۹۵ رو میدیدم، اون موقع با وام مسکن میشد ۲۰ متر خونه خرید تو تهران الان با همین وام فقط ۲ متر خونه میدن @eco_ehsan
😭841❤106😁71👍58👎27
امروز خبر تورم آمریکا ۴:۳۰ عصر میاد، بهتون میگم رو طلا اثرش چی میشه
❤283👍99😁28😭18👎9
والاستریت ژورنال ادعا کرده کشورهای عربی از توافقی که کنترل تنگه هرمز رو به ایران بده حمایت نمیکنن @eco_ehsan
😁278👎76❤51👍47
حباب طلا و سکه رو هنوز پایین نگه داشتن فقط مراقب باشید حباب سکه گرمی از همه بیشتره، فعلا برای خرید سمتش نرید @eco_ehsan
❤144👍57😁7👎4
فردا آمار تورم آمریکا میاد که برای طلا جهانی مهمه اگه تورم بالا باشه جلوی رشدشو میگیره اما اگه مطابق انتظارات یا پایینتر بیاد، خوش خوشان طلا جهانی میشه @eco_ehsan
❤80👍26👎14😁5
برای خرید یه خونه ۸۵ متری تو مرکز تهران باید حدود ۱۱.۵ میلیارد بذارین کنار تازه این عدد برای خونههای بالا ده سال ساخته، خونه نوساز که بماند @eco_ehsan
😭99❤16👍15👎3😁3
بعد بدبختی اینجاست تا یه مدت پایین نگه میدارن بعدش یهو وسط روز میدنش بالا که همه درگیر کار و زندگین سر همین حداقل یه حساب تو اکوگلد باز کنید که اگه تو روز تعطیل یا … طلا برگشت پا نشید تا بازار برید و راحت طلا و نقرهتون رو بخرین👇🏼 http://i.ecogold.ir/knbg
❤34😁12👍9👎6😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,262 posts we hold for @eco_ehsan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 49,531 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@eco_ehsan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ecoehsan | اکواحسان” (@eco_ehsan), 899,495 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eco_ehsan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.