Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

من !

@fandoghtweets

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,769subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001608258299
TypeChannel
Username@fandoghtweets
Descriptionبودن رو با هم ورق می‌زنیم؛ از تو، از من، از ما. 💬 t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=50372395 ℹ️ @Theinforoomfandoghtweets 📣 @Fandoghtweetsbot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fandoghtweets

Growth

6,7696,7856,7776 August 2026 — 6,785 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,785 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,784 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,769 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,767–6,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:006,769-15
6 Aug 2026, 20:236,784-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:186,785no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:036,785first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 6,769 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held28 (31 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total40,452
Reactions total451
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,840
Videos
99
Links
2,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

451 reactions across 27 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31770.3%
💘5011.1%
👍327.10%
❤‍🔥224.88%
🤝143.10%
😭92.00%
💔51.11%
🐳10.222%
👏10.222%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
85
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 28 we hold a reading for · 93%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fandoghtweets. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC298 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mr_EmaaadPhoto

🔅بچه‌ها، «عِمــٰآد جی‌پی‌تی» آماده‌ست. بعد از کلی وقت گذاشتن و درگیری‌های فنی، بالاخره اون چیزی که می‌خواستیم شد. "عِمــٰآد جی‌پی‌تی" یه ابزاره که قراره کارتون رو راه بندازه؛ از پیچیده‌ترین سوالات تا کارهای روزمره. - قابلیت های زیادی داره از جمله دریافت وویس و پاسخ دادنش. - برای اولین بار تو ربات های تلگرام تولید عکس با توجه به توضیحات شما. - و مهمترین قابلیت گفتگوی آنلاین و بدون محدودیت با هوش مصنوعی عماد تو صفح

10 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC684 views34 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

به یه سنی که می‌رسی، دیگه با پدر و مادرت سر اینکه چرا بی‌نقص نبودن نمی‌جنگی. یهو بهشون نگاه می‌کنی و می‌بینی اینا همون جوونای بیست‌واندی ساله‌ی دیروزن که خودشون هم پر از ترس و ابهام بودن؛ فقط تو مسیر طبیعی زندگی افتادن و یهو شدن "پدر و مادر". می‌فهمی بچه‌دار شدن براشون یه پروژه‌ی از پیش تعیین‌شده با دانایی مطلق نبوده؛ فقط بخشی از جریان زندگی بوده که سعی کردن توش غرق نشن. وقتی اینو درک می‌کنی، تمام اون خشم‌ها و توقعات

💘239👍2

10 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC669 views8 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

منم خیلی دلم تنگ شده. هم برا شما، هم برا خودم وقتی پیش شمام.

💘62

10 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC684 views10 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

دلم برای اون‌موقع ها که کلی با ویدیو گردالی باهامون حرف میزنی خیلی تنگ شده بهنوش. خیلی.

🤝81🐳1

10 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,370 views6 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

زمان یه توهمه برای آدمایی که می‌ترسن مسیر خودشون رو برن.

💘42

10 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC700 views16 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

جالب‌ترین بخش بزرگ شدن اینه که وسط گریه برای بحران‌های وجودی و دردهای تموم‌نشدنی، یهو یادت میفته باید به گلدونت آب بدی؛ میری سراغش و سعی می‌کنی با ناز باهاش صحبت کنی، که مبادا انرژی منفی تو روی اون هم اثر بذاره.

💘142

10 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC701 views12 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

همه می‌گن دنبال کسی بگرد که بتونی همه‌چیزت رو باهاش شریک بشی؛ من هنوز سر تقسیم کردن سیب‌زمینی سرخ‌کرده‌هام با خودم درگیرم، چه برسه به روانم!

9💘3

5 Aug 2026, 21:41 UTC≈1,490 views23 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

خیلی وقت‌ها نگرانِ تصویری هستیم که توی ذهن بقیه داریم؛ غافل از اینکه هرکس بیشتر درگیرِ تصویریه که ما از اون داریم. خلاصه خواستم بگم همه‌مون هم‌زمان داریم زیادی فکر می‌کنیم.

22👍1

5 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC≈3,050 views22 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

جدی فکر کنم بخش بزرگی از بزرگسالی اینه که وانمود کنی می‌دونی داری چیکار می‌کنی در حالی که عمیقاً نمی‌دونی.

16🤝6

5 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC≈1,500 views15 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

نمی‌دونم، شاید زندگی همیشه قرار نیست قابل فهم باشه؛ شاید بعضی قسمت‌هاش فقط برای تجربه کردنن، نه فهمیدن.

14👍1

5 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC≈1,470 views8 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

I love the randomness that somehow makes sense. 🩶

❤‍🔥62

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @fandoghtweets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 49,030 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“من !” (@fandoghtweets), 6,769 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fandoghtweets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.