به اون صدایی که تو رو به حس خوب دعوت میکنه گوش کن. اگر نمیتونی بشنویش دلیلش اینه که یاد گرفتی فقط به زمزمهی افکار آشفته گوش کنی. صدای واقعی درونت رو پیدا کن.

Channel
OK
@Ok_Bitcoin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
105,239subscribers
-244 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001048662123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ok_Bitcoin |
| Created | 26 February 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ok_Bitcoin |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 105,239 | -45 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 105,284 | -41 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 105,325 | -24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 105,349 | -32 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 105,381 | -37 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 105,418 | -37 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 105,455 | -28 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 105,483 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 105,483 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.44%
- avg views ÷ 105,239 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,730
- 48 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 48
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (31 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 274,830 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 25s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 48 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ok_Bitcoin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
💜🧡💙💛❤️ بعدازظهرت قلبی قلبی
✨
خونهی مورد علاقهم😍😍
نیکولا تسلا میگفت که قبل از هر اختراعی، دستگاه رو توی ذهنش میساخته و ماهها توی محیط ذهنی و تخیل آزمایشش میکرده. حتی قطعاتی رو تصور میکرد که دچار فرسودگی میشدن، بعد سراغ ساخت نمونهی واقعی میرفت. قدرت تخیلش از بچگی به قدری بالا بود که گاهی تشخیص تصاویر ذهنی از واقعیت براش سخت میشد و بعدها از همین قدرت تجسم برای تست ذهنیِ اختراعاتش استفاده کرد. یک ابر قدرت ذهنی بسیار فراتر از تخیل معمولی.
جنگلهای ۴۰ میلیون سالهی هیرکانی. در همهی شهرهای شمالی داره اتفاق میافته.
تقدیم به تو که دوست دارم چشمات فقط زیبایی ببینه💐💕
شب، همون جاییه که جهان ساکت میشه و شگفتیها نمایان میشن.
دوستی با طبیعت، بالاترین سطح دوستیه.
بازم از رازهای خوشبختی میگم براتون😂
امروز روز جهانی شیر، این موجود باشکوه و زیباست. روزت مبارک پادشاه زیبا❤️
خودتو کشف کن، درونِ تو دنیایی بیانتها وجود داره، آگاه، شگفتانگیز و قدرتمند.
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @Ok_Bitcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Ok_Bitcoin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 128,496 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@nilimag · 1883 posts🚘خدمات جلوبندی پرند🚘
@parand_servis · 382 postsانجمن اسلامی پردیس شهید باهنر اصفهان
@anjoman_eslami_cfu · 751 post*cafe ravanshenasi*
@caferavanshenasi77 · 141 postآموزه های کوتاه جو دیسپنزا
@drjoe_doctrine · 1,9471 postمعجزه ژوپيتر(Jupiter’s Miracle)
@Jupitersmiracleurmia · 131 postمدیریت دانش
@knowledgemanagementt · 91 postخط سوم هنر
@nashrketab · 2301 postکمیته دانشجویی ارتوز وپروتزایران
@OP_student_committe · 521 postopen_world
@Openn_World · 71 postپیشگامان سبز بروجرد
@pishgamani · 121 postتاریخ و تمدن
@tammadon95 · 1111 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lovoology · 147,125
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
@gilin_gilin · 553,188
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 August 2026
@nerkh_foris · 273,788
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@Jaleb · 253,354
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@SoulofDream · 169,132
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@midanesti · 321,907
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
@kafiha · 700,303
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
@geroni_news · 650,456
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
@IranNews · 398,229
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@hamsedair · 1,261,929
Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OK” (@Ok_Bitcoin), 105,239 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ok_Bitcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.