کد مخصوص خرداد ماهی ها

Channel
صدا و سکوت
@SoundSilence
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
118,196subscribers
+586 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001115330949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SoundSilence |
| Created | 18 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SoundSilence |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 118,196 | +132 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 118,064 | +174 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 117,890 | +81 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 117,809 | +105 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:40 | 117,704 | +54 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 117,650 | +40 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 117,610 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 117,610 | first reading |
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.51%
- avg views ÷ 118,196 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,330
- 38 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 38
- of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (28 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 202,462 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
کد مخصوص فرودین ماهی ها
پولت برکت نداره؟ روابط عاطفی خوبی نداری؟ دستت نمک نداره و کسی قدرتو نمیدونه؟ بیا این کانال با قانون جذب بهت اموزش میده چجوری مشکلت رو حل کنی @jazb
Voice message, posted without a caption
تو را آنقدر طولانی دوست دارم که گویی یا در ازل زادهام یا هرگز نخواهم مرد... 📀 @SoundSilence
تو را دوست دارم فراتر از عمر، فراتر از زمان، فراتر از پایان. 📀 @SoundSilence
کد مخصوص خرداد ماهی ها
کد مخصوص فرودین ماهی ها
پولت برکت نداره؟ روابط عاطفی خوبی نداری؟ دستت نمک نداره و کسی قدرتو نمیدونه؟ بیا این کانال با قانون جذب بهت اموزش میده چجوری مشکلت رو حل کنی @jazb
اگه میخوای فرزندت از کودکی به زبان انگلیسی تسلط پیدا کنه بیا اینجا @Zaban
دوست داری بچه ات دو زبانه باشه ؟
- عاااره حتماااا89%
- مگه تو ایرانم داریم ؟ پاک نکن منم بیااام11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
هزينه هاى كلاس زبان واسه بچه ها انقد گرون شده که باید مدرک ایلتس و تافل و msrt و … واسه نسل جدید آرزوشو به گور ببریم؛ اما نگران نباشید کانال زیر آموزش زبان انگلیسی رو از سطح صفر به طور کاملا رایگان میذاره👏 : @zaban
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @SoundSilence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوست داری بچه ات دو زبانه باشه ؟
- عاااره حتماااا89%
- مگه تو ایرانم داریم ؟ پاک نکن منم بیااام11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 157,264 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@alirezataghipour61 · 472 postsادبیات، فلسفه حقوق، حقوق دادرسی
@civilprocedurenotes · 2882 postsRbsArtwork
@AmirRbsArtwork · 121 postهتل رستوران ۳ ستاره آرام ماسوله
@aramhotel · 221 postالکتروکوماکس
@electro_commax · 421 postمرکز آموزش موسیقی ماهور
@mahoormusiccenter · 1581 postمدار ۳۷ درجه شمالی
@north37apps · 1321 postاشعار ناب(روح الغزل)
@Rouholghazal · 1141 postخانه سالمندان نقده
@salmandan_naghade · 871 postنقاشی دیجیتال-seddiq
@seddiq_painting · 251 post⚜ تاج ماه ⚜
@tajmah2017 · 2581 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@RadioRelax · 331,376
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@media_aramesh · 288,034
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
@SoulofDream · 169,132
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@mlienglish · 268,278
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
@PDFsCom · 301,977
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صدا و سکوت” (@SoundSilence), 118,196 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SoundSilence.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.