Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

نرگس صرافیان

@ntoofan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,547subscribers

+106 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001411739363
TypeChannel
Username@ntoofan
Descriptionاینجامنم فقط کمی صمیمی‌تر . با هم فیلم می‌بینیم موزیک گوش می‌کنیم کتاب می‌خوانیم اینجا خودمانی‌تر حرف خواهم‌زد . 🌱 . کانال اصلی نوشته‌های من👇 . @narges_sarrafian_toofan . صفحه اینستاگرام من👇 https://Instagram.com//narges_sarrafian_toofan
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ntoofan

Growth

19,44119,54719,4946 August 2026 — 19,441 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,458 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,460 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,473 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,472 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,515 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,545 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,547 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,425–19,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:2319,547+2
11 Aug 2026, 12:0219,545+30
10 Aug 2026, 14:5119,515+43
9 Aug 2026, 18:1119,472-1
8 Aug 2026, 21:2019,473+13
7 Aug 2026, 20:2619,460+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:5519,458+17
6 Aug 2026, 04:0219,441first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.4%
avg views ÷ 19,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,600
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (25 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total338,980
Reactions total5,372
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
840
Videos
189
Links
194

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,372 reactions across 25 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,372100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,372reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,230 views152 reactionsread 12 August 2026

خدایا! همین‌جوری شکرت... همین که سالمم، آرامم، عزیزانی دارم و تنها نیستم. همین که هدف‌ها و آرزوهایی دارم. همین که سرم به کار خودم گرم است و با کسی کار ندارم. همین که از موفقیت و شادیِ دیگران شاد می‌شوم و در زندگی آنقدر به من داده‌ای که نگاهم به داشته‌های دیگران نباشد و کاش به همه آنقدر بدهی که نگاهشان به داشته‌های دیگران نباشد... شکرت برای همه‌چیز! برای اینکه تو را دارم و هرجا کم آوردم و امیدم ناامید شد، می‌دانم که ت

152

9 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈4,180 views237 reactionsread 12 August 2026

امیدوارم این قماری که سرِ دور کردن و رنجوندنِ من کردی، بردش با تو باشه؛ وگرنه بد باختی...

237

9 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC≈30,200 views369 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هیچ‌کدام از کسانی که مرا آزردند، عاقبت خوبی نصیبشان نشد! من دخترِ مورد علاقه‌ی خدا هستم، مراقب باش! خداوند روی من و احساساتم حساس است...

369

8 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC≈5,640 views216 reactionsread 12 August 2026

متاسفم برای خودمان که جوانی‌مان در نگرانی و بلاتکلیفی و اندوه گذشت. متاسفم که لرزش دست‌ها را تجربه کردیم و پرش پلک‌ها را و شب‌ها از شدت اندوه و اضطراب، به خواب نرفتن و بیدار ماندن را! متاسفم که از بزرگ شدن، فقط دائما کار کردن و بدهکار بودنش به ما رسید و از جوانی؛ فقط عددی که روی کیک‌ها گذاشتیم... متاسفم که فرصت جوانی‌مان فقط یک‌بار بود و همان یک‌بار هم داشتیم جورِ غم‌انگیزترین صفحات تاریخ را می‌کشیدیم و متاسفم که همگ

216

5 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈7,100 views217 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اعتیاد به هر چیزی، می‌تواند جایگزینِ عشقی باشد که دریافت نکرده‌ایم...

217

4 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC≈5,750 views240 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @narges_sarrafian_toofan

دیگر پیامی از من دریافت نخواهی‌کرد! این داستان با تمام خوبی‌ها و بدی‌هایش، برای همیشه به پایان رسید.🕊

240

4 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈7,570 views194 reactionsread 12 August 2026

آزرده‌ترم، گرچه کم‌آزارترم...

194

3 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈8,370 views277 reactionsread 12 August 2026

از بین تمام کسانی که از من متنفرن، یکیشون هم رولزرویس نداره دشمن‌های خیلی ارزون‌قیمتی دارم...🙌

277

3 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈8,660 views232 reactionsread 12 August 2026

نه اینکه نخواهمت، نه اینکه دوستت نداشته‌باشم، نه اینکه دلتنگ نباشم و جای تو میان قلبم خالی نباشد، اما برای بودنت دیر شده عزیزم! آن‌وقت که باید می‌بودی، نبودی، آن‌وقت که باید آرامم می‌کردی، نکردی، آن‌وقت که نیاز داشتم کسی راه را نشانم بدهد، تنها بودم! حالا آمده‌ای؟ من راه زیادی را بدون تو رفتم، سختی‌های زیادی را بدون تو کشیدم، زخم‌های بسیاری را بدون تو برداشتم، جنگ‌های بسیاری را بدون تو رفتم و دستاوردهای زیادی بدون تو

232

2 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC≈7,240 views275 reactionsread 12 August 2026

به گوش ما می‌رسه، ولی شما ارزشِ واکنش ندارید...

275

2 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈7,610 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @narges_sarrafian_toofan

کجا بروم که دلتنگ عزیزان و وطن نباشم؟ کجا می‌توانم بروم؟ کجا را دارم بروم؟! می‌مانم همین‌جا و ناگزیر هر ثانیه با ته مانده‌ی امیدم می‌گردم بین بازار ماشین و طلا تا ببینم چه چیزی مرا از سقوط نجات می‌دهد و وقتی زورم به هیچ چیز نرسید، همان ته‌مانده را صرف نیفتادن و زنده ماندن می‌کنم و خالی می‌شوم. ما خالی شدگان ناباور! ما جوانان و پیرانِ نزیسته! ما امیدوارانِ دویده و دویده و دویده و امید نیافته! ما که با هزار هزار تلاش و

138

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ntoofan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 2,199 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

•| #نرگس_صرافیان_طوفان |•
@narges_sarrafian_toofan · 163,779
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Sepblog | سپهر خدابنده
@Sepblog · 281,493
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نرگس صرافیان” (@ntoofan), 19,547 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ntoofan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.