Channel
@Caption
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
233,539subscribers
-3,293 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001459434669 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Caption |
| Description | حرفهایی که ذهن و قلبت باید بشنوند 💬 @Captionads : تعرفه تبلیغات |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Caption |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 233,539 | -151 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 233,690 | -86 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 233,776 | -90 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 233,866 | +64 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 233,802 | -159 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 233,961 | -276 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 234,237 | -156 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 234,393 | -72 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:11 | 234,465 | -38 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:13 | 234,503 | -73 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 234,576 | -103 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 234,679 | -58 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 234,737 | -74 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 234,811 | -50 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 234,861 | -29 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 234,890 | -80 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 234,970 | -174 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 235,144 | -102 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 235,246 | -116 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 235,362 | first reading |
536 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 266 of 268 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 536 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,402,320 |
| Reactions total | 60,188 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 20:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109,428 reactions across 524 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42,809 | 39.1% | |
| 👍 | 41,010 | 37.5% | |
| 🤣 | 23,851 | 21.8% | |
| 👎 | 1,758 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 534 of the 536 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112,480 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 536 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Caption. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 536 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
گاهى به تماشای خودت بشین و ببین کجا باید خودتو ببخشی کجا باید از خودت بیشتر حمایت کنی کجا باید به خودت کمک کنی و کجا باید در زندگیت تغییر ایجاد کنی چون اینه که تو رو به زندگی دلخواهت نزدیک میکنه و میرسونه🌱 @Caption 🕊 سپهر خدابنده
❤44👍36
You are the best, I keep on annoying you but you still manage do deal with me every single time. Sometimes I become a kid who constantly needs your attention, Sometimes I become a mature person, Sometimes I act dumb, Sometimes I become sad, Sometimes I don't believe in myself, Sometimes I lose my confidence, Sometimes I get very negative, But you keep on supporting me at every stage. Having you by my side is the best…
❤68👎2
حداقل روزی ۸ لیوان هم آب بخورید :)) @Caption امید توشه
🤣154❤16👍15
Making a million friends is not a miracle, the miracle is to make a friend who will stand by you when millions are against you. پیدا کردن یک میلیون دوست و رفیق معجزه نیست، معجزه پیدا کردن دوستیه که وقتی یک میلیون نفر برعلیهات هستن اون پشتت محکم ایستاده ♥️ ~ @Caption
❤130👍28👎2
حتما شنیدی که تو فیزیک چیزی به اسم سرما وجود نداره! و ما اصطلاحا گرمای کم رو سرما میگیم! اگر واقعا چیزی به اسم شادی وجود نداشته باشه چی؟ اگه شادی به غمِ کم گفته بشه چی؟ @Caption بوی گندم
👍220❤50👎19🤣14
🪵الان نیاز دارم توی ون مسافرتی وسط جنگل باشم، آتیش روشن باشه، هوا سرد باشه، آهنگ ملایم خوب به راه باشه، یه نم بارون بزنه، بوی خاک خیس پراکنده باشه و موبایلم آنتن نداشته باشه🔥 @Caption Esmeralda
❤42👍13👎1
من اگه ۲ ساعت غذام دیر بشه: @Caption ماه پیشونی
🤣148❤8👍8
آدما فقط لحظه انفجار تورو میبینن، نمیبینن چقدر کنار اومدی، کوتاه اومدی و سازش کردی. @Caption نیموگ
❤172👍105👎1
پنج تا از چیزایی که یک فرد افسرده دوست داره شما بدونید: ۱- افسردگی انتخاب نیست، اون آدم نمیتونه یه روز از خواب بیدار شه و تصمیم بگیره که افسرده نباشه. ۲- "زندگی خیلی قشنگیها داره چرا ازش لذت نمیبری؟" برای آدم افسرده مثل اینه که به کسی که آسم داره بگی "دنیا این همه اکسیژن داره، چرا تنفسش نمیکنی؟" ۳- اگه قراراشو باهاتون کنسل میکنه یا طول میکشه جواب مسیجاتونو بده شما کاری نکردید، مشکل این آدم با خودشه نه شما، هی …
👍96❤34👎2
⚡️مسابقه تلگرامی هایپراستار با کلی جایزه 💰 به ربات تلگرامی هایپراستار بیا، رکورد خفن بزن و بدون قرعهکشی جایزه بگیر: 1️⃣ نفر اول ۵۰ میلیون تومان اعتبار خرید از هایپراستار 2️⃣ نفر دوم ۴۰ میلیون تومان 3️⃣ نفر سوم ۳۰ میلیون تومان 4️⃣ نفر چهارم ۲۰ میلیون تومان 5️⃣ نفر پنجم ۱۰ میلیون تومان 💚 به همراه کد اشتراک یک ماهه فیلیمو مدرسه برای تمام شرکتکنندگان شرکت در بازی 👇 @hyperstariranofficialbot @hyperstariranofficialb…
❤4
ما همه مون مشکلاتی داریم، همه مون چیزهایی رو داریم که باهاشون سر و کله بزنیم، بعضی روزا از دیگران بهتریم، بعضی روزا متوسطیم و بعضی روزا هم فقط جا رو واسه دیگران تنگ کردیم. @Caption 📽Detachment
❤99👍32
قشنگترین دعایی که تو زندگیم شنیدم این بود: "خدا براتون بسازه توی سکوت از دلِ ناامیدی مثل معجزه" @Caption
❤280👍24
Showing the 12 most recent of 536 posts we hold for @Caption. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Caption edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Caption named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 74 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Caption | کپشن” (@Caption), 233,539 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Caption.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.