Channel
@Foot_twitte
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,148subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001058109955 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Foot_twitte |
| Description | آخرین توییتهای فوتبالی & ورزشی رو از فوت توییت دنبال کنید! @FootFun2020 @footfuntv2024 سرویس پخش زنده فوتفان 👇 تبلیغات @fftabligh 👈 نحوهی ارسال توییت: فقط در توییتر با هشتگ #فوتفان و #فوت_توییت 👉 بازنشر توییت به معنای تاییدش نیست. |
| Created | 3 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Foot_twitte |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 27,148 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 27,147 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 27,151 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 27,156 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 27,158 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 27,160 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 27,167 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 27,177 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 27,178 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 27,178 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 367,650 |
| Reactions total | 7,349 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,789 reactions across 42 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 2,016 | 29.7% | |
| ❤ | 1,314 | 19.4% | |
| 👍 | 1,183 | 17.4% | |
| 😁 | 790 | 11.6% | |
| 🔥 | 710 | 10.5% | |
| 💔 | 517 | 7.62% | |
| 👎 | 213 | 3.14% | |
| 😍 | 35 | 0.516% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 0.118% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.044% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اگر میخوای فوتبال رو از یه زاویهی جدید و خاص نگاه کنی، این کانال رو از دست نده. اینجا فقط دربارهی فوتبال حرف زده نمیشه؛ سیاست، تاریخ، روانشناسی، جامعه، اطلاعات عمومی و کلی موضوع دیگه رو از دریچهی فوتبال بررسی میکنیم. ⚽️ فوتبال، به مثابهی زندگی: https://t.me/+JARf8jzlevY0ZjM0
❤7
Signed footfuniran Ads
نیمه اول سوپرکاپ اروپا داشت با برتری یک گله پاریسن ژرمن تموم میشد که ماجو با گل قشنگش در لحظات پایانی بازی رو مساوی کرد. ماجو حالا همزمان هم جوانترین بازیکنیه که در سوپرکاپ فیکس میشه و هم گل میزنه. @FootFun2020 | مورتی
❤22👍4
Signed footfuniran Ads
صرافی بزرگ هات ووچرز 🔥 خرید و فروش هات ووچر و Uvoucher برای خرید : https://t.me/hotvoucher_ir https://t.me/hotvoucher_ir https://t.me/hotvoucher_ir قابل استفاده در اکثر سایت های معتبر ✅ صرافی تلگرامی سایت صرافی Exmaz🤝
❤3
Signed footfuniran Ads
نه روز تا آغاز فصل جدید رقابتهای لیگ برتر انگلستان باقی ماندهاست. به همین مناسبت، یادی کنیم از شمارهٔ ۹ سابق آرسنال و وستهم، داور شوکر، ستارهای که برای رهایی از حاشیهها، رویکرد وقاحتآمیز جان توشاک و آغازی دوباره، به لندن پناه برد. او که آقای گل جام جهانی ۱۹۹۸ بود؛ در تابستان سال بعد، راهی آرسنال شد. آرسن ونگر به تازگی نیکولا آنلکا را به رئال مادرید فروخته بود و بخش عمدهای از سود حاصل از آن را برای بهخدمتگیر…
❤51👍5🔥3🤣1
Signed Hadi Farahani
هوادار استقلال در حال دیدن رونمایی بقیهی تیمها از بازیکنای جدیدشون: «هنوز نرجسم» @foot_twitte
💔75🤣42👎2❤1👍1
Signed Hadi Farahani
ده روز تا آغاز فصل جدید رقابتهای لیگ برتر انگلستان باقی ماندهاست. به همین مناسبت، بد نیست از بازیکن شمارهٔ ۱۰ باشگاه وستهم یاد کنیم که خوب یا بد، در زمین بازی، آینهای از وجودش بود. این ستارهٔ بیرحم که همواره به خشونت، حواشی و درگیریهایش شهرت داشت، در سال ۲۰۰۱ برندهٔ جایزهٔ بازی جوانمردانهٔ فیفا شد. چرا؟ چون پائولو دیکانیو در بازی مقابل اورتون نشان داد که هر انسانی جلوههای مختلفی در زندگی خود دارد و هیچ انسانی…
❤75👍14🤣2😍2
با اینکه قدیمی هست ولی فریم به فریم این ویدئو یه داستان فیلم سینمایی هست وحید امیری رد میشه منصوریان با تعجب نگاه میکنه رهگذران صداش میکنن آقا وحید علی آقا منصوریان امیری بر میگرده تو گوشش میگه به موری بگو زنگ بزنه به من بعد با موتور بتمن میره خیلی عجیبه «Majiqu » @foot_twitte
🤣216❤11😁3👍2👎2
Signed mehran
قیافهی من وقتی به زور میبردنم خونه فامیل عید دیدنی😂😂😂 «محمد پارسا رحمانی» @foot_twitte
🤣118👍9😁3
Signed 𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅
اینارو با کله خالی گفتی یا قبلش چیزی زدی رامین جان؟ حالت خوشه؟ «Hadi Farahani» @foot_twitte
🤣351😁6❤4👍1💔1
دنیس اکرت، بازیکن اهل آلمان که به تیم ملی ایران دعوت شد و در جام جهانی «۰» دقیقه به میدان رفت، در نخستین بازی فصل استاندارد لیژ برابر سرکل بروخه بریس ثبت کرد. او همچنین به لطف عملکرد درخشان خود، در ترکیب برترین بازیکنان هفتهٔ اول لیگ حرفهای بلژیک جای گرفت. «Soshiyant Nr» @foot_twitte
🔥84😁29❤11👍6
Signed Hadi Farahani
حتی اگه رودری، آلوارز و مدافع وسط هم جذب شن بازهم بنظرم دکو و لاپورتا شاهکار خاصی نکردن، بارسا در این صورت صرفاً یک پنجره خیلی خوب رو سپری میکنه و نباید فراموش کرد اصلیترین دلیلی که دو فصل اخیر از چمپیونزلیگ حذف شدیم ضعف اسکواد بوده. «Akhtari» @foot_twitte
👍94👎58😁10❤2
Signed Hadi Farahani
لیورپول داره یه پیشنهاد برای آرائوخو ارسال می.... بارسلونا: «توییت ترجمه شده» @foot_twitte
🤣130❤1👍1
Signed Hadi Farahani
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @Foot_twitte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 572,141 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوت توییت ⚽️” (@Foot_twitte), 27,148 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Foot_twitte.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.