Channel
@media_aramesh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
288,361subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001006855450 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @media_aramesh |
| Description | خوش آمدید🌹 آگاهی و آرامش را همزمان تجربه کنیم @Text_Advertise : سفارش تبلیــغات بله https://ble.ir/media_aramesh اینستاگرام http://instagram.com/media_aramesh مدیا آرامش | روانشناسی موفقیت انگیزشی | |
| Created | 1 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/media_aramesh |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 288,361 | -225 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:14 | 288,586 | -139 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 288,725 | -175 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 288,900 | -87 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 288,987 | -287 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 289,274 | -500 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 289,774 | +1,336 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 288,438 | -235 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 288,673 | -251 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 288,924 | -270 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:03 | 289,194 | -141 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 289,335 | -115 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 289,450 | +892 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 288,558 | -56 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 288,614 | -58 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 288,672 | +1,346 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 287,326 | -65 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 287,391 | -220 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 287,611 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 287,608 | first reading |
490 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 490 (4 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,001,560 |
| Reactions total | 80,911 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 01:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 93 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
152,211 reactions across 479 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86,679 | 56.9% | |
| 👍 | 35,229 | 23.1% | |
| 👏 | 12,752 | 8.38% | |
| 🙏 | 3,607 | 2.37% | |
| 👌 | 3,473 | 2.28% | |
| 💔 | 2,762 | 1.81% | |
| 😢 | 1,309 | 0.86% | |
| 😍 | 1,210 | 0.795% | |
| 💯 | 1,101 | 0.723% | |
| 😭 | 1,033 | 0.679% | |
| ❤🔥 | 484 | 0.318% | |
| 🕊 | 407 | 0.267% | |
| 😘 | 350 | 0.23% | |
| 🔥 | 304 | 0.2% | |
| 🥰 | 298 | 0.196% | |
| 🤗 | 169 | 0.111% | |
| 🤝 | 128 | 0.084% | |
| ⚡ | 120 | 0.079% | |
| 🤯 | 115 | 0.076% | |
| 👀 | 92 | 0.06% | |
| 14 further kinds | 589 | 0.387% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 490 of the 490 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154,519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 490 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @media_aramesh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 490 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧠 لایههای ذهن | روانشناسی به زبان ساده تا حالا فکر کردهای چرا بعضی خاطرات، حتی بعد از سالها، هنوز احساساتمان را تغییر میدهند؟ چرا بعضی رفتارها را تکرار میکنیم، حتی وقتی میدانیم به ضررمان است؟ ذهن ما چطور میترسد، دلبسته میشود، تصمیم میگیرد و گاهی علیه خودمان عمل میکند؟ ✍ در لایههای ذهن سراغ بخشهای کمتر دیدهشدهی روان انسان میرویم؛ از تروما و اختلالات روانی تا روابط، هیجانها، خطاهای شناختی، رفتار، انگی…
❤15👍9👌4
دنبال اصالت بگردین؛ آدم بی چارچوب اصیل نیست، آدمی که قول میده پاش وایمیسته اصیله، آدمی که تعهد و مسئولیتپذیری بلده اصیله، آدمی که نگرانه دل کسیرو بشکنه اصیله، آدمی که به هر قیمتی نمیخواد پولدار بشه اصیله، آدمی که به هر قیمتی نمیخواد دیده بشه اصیله... @media_aramesh
❤90👏26👍13💯8👌2
تو نگران هستی که مردم دربارهی من چه فکری خواهند کرد، اما من عجله دارم که تو را مطمئن کنم، که احترامِ من به خودم، برایم بیش از هرچیزِ دیگری اهمیت دارد. ✍️ : #فئودور_داستایفسکی @media_aramesh
❤114👍41👏9
سه ماده ای که میتونه افسردگی رو تا حد زیادی از بین ببره ویتامین D، امگا ۳ و کراتین فقط برای استخوان، قلب یا عضله مهم نیستند؛ پژوهشها نشان میدهند ممکن است بر سلامت مغز و خلقوخو نیز اثر بگذارند @media_aramesh
👍65❤22🙏5😭2👌1
اگر کتابی را از وسط باز کنی، ممکن است شخصیت خوب داستان را در حال اشتباه ببینی و شخصیت بد را در حال انجام یک کار درست. اگر همان یک صفحه را بخوانی، شاید درباره هر دو اشتباه قضاوت کنی. آدمها هم همیناند. ما معمولاً یک صفحه از زندگیشان را میبینیم؛ یک عصبانیت، یک سکوت، یک شکست، یک تصمیم بد... اما از فصلهایی که قبل از آن گذشته خبر نداریم. شاید برای همین است که هرچه بیشتر کسی را میشناسیم، قضاوت کردن دربارهاش سخت…
👍142❤62👏22👌16😘5
جشنواره هدایای رویایی اسنوا 🎉با خرید و نصب محصولات منتخب🎉 —— بدون قرعهکشی هدیه دریافت کنید —— با خرید از اسنوا، علاوه بر دریافت هدیه از تخفیف حین خرید هم استفاده کنید💰 ⏳فرصت، فقط تا 15 مهر❗️ 🔥 برای اطلاعات بیشتر وارد لینک زیر بشید: 👇👇👇 https://lnk.snowa.ir/snowa-telegram .
👍5❤2
بعضی آدمها هیچچیز تازهای به آدم اضافه نمیکنن، فقط چیزهایی رو پس میدن که زندگی یواشیواش ازت گرفته بود. ذوق، شیطنت، اعتماد، آرامش، میل دوست داشتن… و شاید برای همینه که بودن کنارشون بیشتر از «عاشق شدن»، شبیه برگشتن به خونهس... @media_aramesh
❤173👍57😢10👏9👀2🙊1
شدیدترین شکل خستگی، حاصل کار زیاد نیست؛ حاصل سرکوب مداوم خشم و احساسات است. ✍ : #دونالد_وینیکات @media_aramesh
👍247❤59👌37😢15😭6👏4💔3👀2
یه وقتایی خدا یجوری حلش میکنه که انگار بین این همه، فقط صدای تو رو شنیده امیدوارم امروز نوبت تو باشه❤️
❤573🙏102👍43💔17😭10💯5👏3😢3
بهاى حركت كردن، اين است كه به صورت مداوم، در معرض سقوط قرار میگیریم... و گاهی انسان از ترس سقوط، تمام عمر میايستد. 📚جهان همچون اراده و تصور ✍🏻 آرتور_شوپنهاور @media_aramesh
❤141👏24👍18⚡11💔4🤯1
❣امروز🌤 همان روزی است که مدت ها منتظرش بودی، روزی برای یک شروع... برای یک تصمیم... برای یک تغییر... پس از همین امروز تصمیم بگیر، تغییر کن و شروع کن...🍃🍃🍃 @Media_aramesh
❤129👍28🙏10👌2🥰2
📊 قبل از اینکه معامله کنی، بازار رو رصد کن! در رصد بازار قرار نیست فقط با چند خط و چند عدد بهت بگیم «بخر» یا «بفروش» اینجا بازار رو تحلیل و بررسی میکنیم؛ از روند شاخصها و نمادهای مهم گرفته تا رفتار قیمت، نقدینگی و موقعیتهای معاملاتی 🎯 هدف ما اینه که به جای دنبال کردن هیجانات بازار، منطق پشت حرکت قیمت رو بهتر ببینید. اگر به دنبال تحلیلهای عمیقتر و نگاه متفاوت به بازار سرمایه هستی: 🦅 رصد بازار | جایی برای دید…
👍13❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 490 posts we hold for @media_aramesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@media_aramesh edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@media_aramesh named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی 🍃 موفقیت انگیزشی آرامش” (@media_aramesh), 288,361 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/media_aramesh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.