Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -568. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 287,741–288,521 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 10:33
287,831
-64
14 Aug 2026, 02:35
287,895
-139
12 Aug 2026, 21:58
288,034
-68
11 Aug 2026, 22:02
288,102
-158
10 Aug 2026, 21:21
288,260
-142
9 Aug 2026, 18:45
288,402
-29
8 Aug 2026, 20:01
288,431
+12
7 Aug 2026, 18:15
288,419
+36
6 Aug 2026, 14:43
288,383
-16
6 Aug 2026, 00:54
288,399
no change
5 Aug 2026, 20:50
288,399
first reading
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.22%
avg views ÷ 287,831 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,000
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
95 (4 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
1,428,034
Reactions total
28,945
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈28,800
Videos
≈6,410
Links
≈2,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 34s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26,637 reactions across 84 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15,252
57.3%
👍
6,370
23.9%
👏
2,101
7.89%
👌
684
2.57%
🙏
429
1.61%
💔
399
1.50%
😍
201
0.755%
😭
192
0.721%
💯
172
0.646%
😢
162
0.608%
🔥
128
0.481%
🥰
91
0.342%
🕊
79
0.297%
😘
69
0.259%
❤🔥
60
0.225%
🤗
50
0.188%
🤯
43
0.161%
👀
36
0.135%
😇
19
0.071%
💘
16
0.06%
11 further kinds
84
0.315%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,945reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حضرت مولانا توی یکی از داستان های مثنوی میگه که:
اگر دانه ای رو کاشتی به هیچکس راجع بهش نگو چون حتی اگه یه کلاغ جای اونو یاد بگیره ثمرهی کارتو از دست میدی چه برسه اینکه آدما ازش با خبر بشن
هر ایده،هدف،تفکر،برنامه ای تو ذهنتون هست تا زمان به ثمر نشستنش به کسی چیزی نگید
@media_aramesh
باید بپذیری هیچکس قرار نیس دوست داشتنی که تو به خودت نداری و بهت بده، هیچکس قرار نیس امیدی که تو به زندگی نداری و بهت بده، هیچکس قرار نیس خوشحالی که تو باید در زندگیت پیداش کنی و برات پیداش کنه، هیچکس قرار نیس هدفی که نداری و برات بسازه و محققش کنه. و هیچکس قرار نیس والدت بشه و تمام نیازهات رو برطرف کنه.
تو فقط خودتی و خودت رو داری، پس قبل از دیگران خودت رو دریاب، چون تا وقتی خودت خلاهاتو پر نکردی، کسی دیگه نمیتونه …
حتی اگر همهی درها هم به رویت بسته شود،
در پایان او از جایی که هیچکس نمی داند،
پنجره ای می گشاید
هر چند تو ابتدا نمی توانی ببینی.
اما پشت روزنه های تنگ،
چه بهشت هایی که پنهان است
پس شکر کن
وقتی به مراد خود رسیده باشی،
شکر کردن آسان است
اما صوفی کسی ست که حتی زمان برآورده نشدن آرزویش هم می تواند شاکر باشد.❤️
@media_aramesh
این روزها خبر زیاد میخونیم؛ اما کمتر کسی بهمون یاد میده با فشار و اضطرابی که توی ذهنمون میمونه، چطور کنار بیایم... 🤍🌱
من دکتر فرشته یاقوتی هستم، روانشناس.
«روشنای جان» رو ساختم تا جایی داشته باشیم برای یاد گرفتن چیزهایی که شاید هیچوقت کسی به ما یاد نداده؛
چطور با خودمون مهربونتر باشیم، چطور عشق بورزیم، مرز بذاریم، رابطههای سالمتری بسازیم و با آدمهای مهم زندگیمون ارتباط بهتری داشته باشیم.
اینجا قراره الفب…
تروما تو رو قویتر نکرد.
تروما بهت آسیب زد، قلبت رو شکست، سیستم عصبیات رو از تنظیم خارج کرد، بهت PTSD داد، شبهای بیخوابی و مشکل در اعتماد کردن و برقراری ارتباط برات به جا گذاشت؛ نزدیک بود از پا درت بیاره و حتی میل به زندگی رو ازت بگیره.
این خودِ تو بودی و هستی که خودت رو قویتر کردی… با زنده موندن و دوام آوردن.
@media_aramesh
چقدر قشنگه این متن:
منتظر نباش تا کامل بشی.
با همین تکههای ناقصت راه بیفت.
با سؤالهات ادامه بده.
حتی وقتی هنوز داری خودت رو از نو کنار هم میچینی.
فقط حرکت کن.✨
اگه یه دوست صمیمی دارید که با موفقیتتون خوشحال میشه و بالا رفتن شما رو مثل پیشرفتِ خودش موفقیت میبینه خیلی خوشبختین! به قول اسکار وایلد
"هر کسی میتواند با رنجهای دیگران همدردی کند، اما خشنود شدن از موفقیتهای دیگران، سرشت بسیار پاکی میخواهد".
@media_aramesh
ژاپنیها مفهومی دارن به نام یوهاکو 余白 و معنای لغویش «فضای سفید، حاشیه یا بخش خالیه»؛ یعنی قسمتی از صفحه که عمداً چیزی در اون نوشته یا ترسیم نشده..
این مفهوم در اصل مربوط به فضا و هنر بوده، اما امروز میتونیم بهصورت استعاری ازش در زندگی روزمره هم استفاده کنیم:
• لازم نیست موقع غذا خوردن، استراحت یا انتظار، فوراً سراغ گوشی برید؛ چند دقیقه اجازه بدید هیچ کاری نکنید.
• لازم نیست در هر گفتوگویی بلافاصله جواب بدید؛ چ…
پروردگارا، تو را سپاس میگویم که در تلاطمِ روزگار، پناهی جز آغوشِ امنت برایم باقی نگذاشتی؛ که اگر به غیرِ تو دل میبستم، هرگز شکوهِ بیهمتایِ تکیه بر قدرتِ بیپایانت را نمیشناختم.
شکر تو را که در تاریکترین لحظات، آنجا که چراغِ امید به خاموشی میگرایید، با اعجازِ حضورت به من یادآور شدی که واژهی «ناممکن» در قاموسِ کبریاییِ تو هیچ معنایی ندارد.
سپاس برای آن شبهای دشواری که هراس بر جانم سایه افکنده بود، اما طنینِ …
❤242🙏42😭9😇4🙊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @media_aramesh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@media_aramesh edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 56,457 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@media_aramesh named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@filtersazansabz named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فوق انگیزشی | روانشناسی موفقیت @angizeshi75 · 121,190 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
مدیتیشن و چاکرا درمانی(فقیه) @moragebeheh · 133,060 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
•| #نرگس_صرافیان_طوفان |• @narges_sarrafian_toofan · 163,787 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
روانشناسی زنان و مردان @Ravnshnas · 152,458 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
مجله پزشکی @majalepezeshki · 555,264 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 August 2026
کانال موزیکفا/ آهنگ جدید/ ریمیکس رپ @M0_ZK · 1,161,786 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی 🍃 موفقیت انگیزشی آرامش” (@media_aramesh), 287,831 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/media_aramesh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.