Channel
@lady_eel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
104,754subscribers
-406 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001366248503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lady_eel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lady_eel |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 104,754 | -46 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 104,800 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 104,826 | -74 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 104,900 | -68 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 104,968 | -59 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 105,027 | -66 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 105,093 | -67 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 105,160 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 105,160 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (17 June 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 115,290 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
از لحاظ روانشناسی وقتی دو نفر با هم خیلی صمیمی هستن یا مدت زیادی باهم بودن، ناخودآگاه حالت ها و رفتارهای همدیگرو مثل اینه بازتاب میکنن! مثلا با بهترین دوستت نشستی و دارین حرف میزنین اگه اون حالتش رو عوض کنه، پاهاش روی هم بندازه ناخودآگاه شما کارش رو تکرار میکنید! یا اگر توی جمعی باشید و بخندید شما اولین نفر به خنده ی اون نگاه میکنید؛گاهی رفتاراتون و صحبت کردن آنقدر شبیه همه دیگه میشه که حتی اگر خودتون متوجه نشید دیگر…
🤯 باور میکنی این تصاویر، همشون در کمتر از ۱۰ ثانیه با هوش مصنوعی ساخته شدن؟! 😱 انقدر طبیعی و حرفهای که شاید باورش برات سخت باشه! 🔥 توی کانال زیر میتونی به هزاران پرامپت متنوع + آموزش ساخت تصاویر خفن با هوش مصنوعی دسترسی داشته باشی🥰 👇 قبل از اینکه دیر بشه، جوین شو: https://t.me/dlloprompt
دیشب شاهد بحث بین دونفر بودم و یکیشون میگفت: تو اینقدر خودتو نمیبینی که حتی از ظرف بیسکویت روی میز هم اون شکسته هاشو برمیداری؛ میگی سالم هاش باشه برای بقیه! خواستم بگم یادت نره حواست باید اول از همه به خودت باشه؛ فداکاریهایی که میکنی مرز داره اگر از مرزش رد بشی هم خودتو آزار میده هم بقیه رو... خودتو فراموش نکن؛ تو در نهایت فقط خودتو داری. لِیدیاِل🌱
شبی رو یادمه که از ترس اینکه فرداش امتحانمو خوب ندم تا خود صبح بیدار بودم. الان که به اون شب فکر می کنم خندم می گیره. دنیام چقد کوچیک بود. فرضا که امتحانمو بد می دادم خب که چی، مگه دنیا به آخر می رسید؟ نه. می خوام بگم يه زمانی يه چيزی برات اونقدر مهمه که به خاطرش روح و روانتو آزار می دی، اما همون چیزیه سال بعد ممکنه کاملا برات بی اهميت باشه و با فکر بهش بخندی، می دونم همین الان یاد يكی از دغدغه هات افتادی، آره همونی …
یه جا خوندم نوشته بود: بیشتر آسیب هایی که میبینیم بخاطر اینه توقع داریم همه آدما مثل ما فکر کنن، مثل ما رفتار کنن! اما نباید یادمون بره هرکسی از نگاه خودش دنیا رو میبینه.
بهجای پیچوندن و بیمحلی کردن از این جملات استفاده کنید: - من واقعاً دوست داشتم که بیشتر باهات آشنا بشم ولی هیچ ارتباطی بینمون حس نمیکنم. ممنون که وقتت رو به من اختصاص دادی. - در حال حاضر اونقدر سرم شلوغه و درگیر زندگیمم که توانایی اولویتبندی رابطهمون رو ندارم. - این رابطه به درد من نمیخوره. امیدوارم که درک کنی... - احساس میکنم تو این رابطه به خط قرمزهام احترام گذاشته نمیشه و دیگه نمیتونم باهات ادامه بدم. - د…
الکساندر دوما یه رمان خیلی معروف داره به نام سه تفنگدار؛ یه تیکه از این رمان رو با تموم وجودم حسش کردم که میگه: « هر قدر كه يك انسان شریف تر، نجیب تر و حساستر باشد، از خیانت دیگران بیشتر رنج می برد. این موضوع دو علت دارد: یکی اینکه خود را مستحق خیانت نمی بیند و دیگر اینکه منتظر نیست که سایرین با او عملی کنند که خود او با سایرین نکرده است! » لِیدیاِل🌱
با اون قسمت از خودت که اشتباه میکنه مهربون تر باش! اون درحال یاد گرفتنه.. گاهی وقتا خیلی ها رو میبخشی جز خودت! یادت باشه اشتباه کردن جزئی از زندگیه :) لِیدیاِل🌱
تصور کن یه لیوان آب و تو دستت نگه داشتی! اگه اونو ۲۰ ثانیه توی دستات نگه داری هیچ اتفاقی نمیوفته. اگه اونو ۲۰ دقیقه نگه داری دستت شروع میکنه به درد گرفتن. اگه اونو ۲۰ ساعت نگه داری دستت فلج و بی حس میشه. وزن شیشه تغییری نکرده اما هرچقدر مدت نگه داشتنش بیشتر میشه وزن اونم بیشتر میشه نگرانی ها؛ استرس و اضطراب زندگی روزمره هم دقیقا مثل لیوانه! اگه یه کم دربارشون فکر کنی، هیچ اتفاقی نمیوفته. اما اگه مدت طولانی بهشون فکر …
حتی اگه بیوفته کارام عقب باید هروز ببینمت بغلم چجوری بگم دوست دارم آخه من تا همینجاشو بلدم :)
روی آشتی دادن اجباری تاکید نکنید. آشتی زمانی معنا پیدا میکنه که فرد آسیب زننده مسئولیت رفتارش رو بپذیره و برای ترمیم آسیب هایی که زده تلاش کنه. در غیر اینصورت، اصرار بر آشتی میتونه زخم هارو عمیق تر کنه.. آشتی یک فرآیند ترمیمیه، نه یک اجبار اخلاقی! بدون پذیرش مسئولیت، احترام به مرزها، و تلاش برای جبران، آشتی اغلب به بازتولید همون الگوهای آسیب زا منجر میشه. لیدیاِل🌱
از شمس تبریزی پرسیدن که چه شد به آرامش رسیدی؟ پاسخ داد: وعده این شد که خود را آرام کنم نه جهان اطرافم را! معجزه شد؛ جهان اطرافم هم آرام گرفت... میدونی که چی میگه؟ میگه برای یه مدت رها کن اطرافت و اتفاقاتش رو.. رو خودت تمرکز کن! و میبینی که ناخوداگاه جهان اطرافت هم تغییر میکنه. لِیدیاِل🌱
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @lady_eel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 417,756 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“˼لِیـــدی اِل🌱⸀” (@lady_eel), 104,754 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lady_eel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.