🏆 درک ریسک، کشف ارزش و تشخیص روند چارچوبی برای تصمیم سازی و خلق ثروت
پشتیبانی :
@Mosbat_Sabz_Admin
وبسایت ما:
Https://financcee.com
مسئول بازاریابی و تبلیغات:
@Parsa_roshann
همیشه سبز با #مثبت_سبز 💚
Created
Between 1 September 2016 and 31 October 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,892–33,150 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:34
33,120
+20
12 Aug 2026, 22:13
33,100
+28
12 Aug 2026, 01:02
33,072
+81
11 Aug 2026, 01:46
32,991
+64
10 Aug 2026, 00:42
32,927
+5
9 Aug 2026, 00:54
32,922
-7
7 Aug 2026, 22:51
32,929
+2
6 Aug 2026, 20:54
32,927
-1
6 Aug 2026, 01:51
32,928
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:17
32,928
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.7%
avg views ÷ 33,120 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,490
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
62 (3 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
588,350
Reactions total
9,884
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,020
Videos
≈124
Links
≈284
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
9,794 reactions across 61 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,864
49.7%
❤
3,423
34.9%
👎
543
5.54%
🔥
324
3.31%
😱
303
3.09%
👏
188
1.92%
👌
149
1.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,884reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✔️وقتی توافق تبدیل به ریسک میشه!
یکی از مراجعه کننده ها، سبدداراییشون رو
به شکل زیر چیده بودن:
📈ملک ۵۰٪
📈طلا ۳۰٪
📈دلار ۱۵٪
📈نقره ۵٪
چون سوالش میتونه کمکی به شما دوستان باشه. سوال رو اینجا جواب
سوال پرسیدن که
📊آیا من تمرکز دارایی دارم؟!
خیر، اما سبددارایی شما ریسک بزرگتر از تمرکز دارایی داره که بهش میگن تمرکز سناریو!
یعنی با اینکه دارایی ها متنوع به نظر میرسن، اما بخش زیادی از اونها از یک سناریوی مشترک سود میبرن: ر…
✔️ آغاز عرضه بنزین با نرخ تمامشده پالایشگاهی به مبلغ ۸۷,۲۰۰ تومان هر لیتر، از بامداد پنجشنبه (۲۱ مرداد) در ۲۰۴ جایگاه سوخت استان کرمان.
پ ن : بستن تنگه هرمز برای گرانکردن بنزین آمریکا بود، نه ایران.
✅@Mosbat_sabz [🍀]
✔️اگر زروان میخریدیم، چقدر بیشتر سود میکردیم؟!
همه صندوق های طلا از یک بازار سود میگیرن، اما بازدهی همه اونها یکسان نیست.
بررسی بازدهی صندوق های طلا نشون میده انتخاب درست صندوق، خودش میتونه چند درصد بازدهی بیشتر برای سرمایه گذار بسازه.
یعنی حتی اگر جهت بازار طلا رو درست تشخیص داده باشید، هنوز یک تصمیم مهم باقی میمونه:
کدوم صندوق طلا رو بخریم؟
در این مقایسه میبینیم زروان نسبت به سایر صندوق ها چقدر بازدهی بیشتری ساخته…
✔️جالبه بدونید که یه زمانی، وقتی بازار منفی بود و پست تحلیلی یا مطلبی میذاشتیم، هر پست ۸۰۰ تا ۹۰۰ تا ریاکشن میگرفت. ولی الان با وجود اینکه کیفیت مطالب بیشتر شده و بازار هم مثبت هست، تعداد ریاکشنها کم شده.
پیشنهادم اینه که همیشه فعال باشید. میدونم شرایط کشور بهتر نشده، اما لطفاً مطالب رو با دقت بخونید و در زدن ریاکشن کوتاهی نکنید. این کار چندتا خوبی داره:
۱- ما متوجه میشیم به چه نوع پستهایی علاقه دارید و می…
✔️قابل توجه آنهایی که ریسک جنگ را جدی نمیگیرند.
#شپدیس یکی از بزرگترین، بهترین و بنیادیترین شرکتهای اورهساز بود که در جنگ قبلی آسیب دید. جالب اینجاست که نهتنها از رشد اخیر جا ماند، بلکه حتی ریزش هم کرد.
حالا شما که ریسک جنگ را نادیده میگیرید، پرتفوی اصولی نمیچینید، یا تمام سرمایهتان را میریزید روی یک سهم، اگر شرکت مدنظرتان آسیب ببیند، چه میکنید؟
این هشدار فقط برای بورس نیست؛ برای طلا و دلار هم صدق میکند…
✔️گزارش هفتگی مفید : تحلیل بنیادی شرکت شاملا را میتوانید در انتهای فایل گزارش هفتگی مطالعه کنید.
✅@Mosbat_sabz [🍀]
👍44❤29
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @Mosbat_sabz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 605,713 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کدال۳۶۰ @Codal360_ir · 115,523 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
بتا سهم @betasahm1 · 123,235 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
پیکنیک تحلیل @PiknikAnalyst · 112,161 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“️️مثبت سبز” (@Mosbat_sabz), 33,120 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mosbat_sabz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
