Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 93 days, net +3,319. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73,873–80,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 15:15
77,996
-62
5 Nov 2026, 15:16
78,058
-11
4 Nov 2026, 18:29
78,069
+443
3 Nov 2026, 18:51
77,626
-42
2 Nov 2026, 20:17
77,668
-39
1 Nov 2026, 20:08
77,707
-76
31 Oct 2026, 21:05
77,783
-48
30 Oct 2026, 21:09
77,831
-113
29 Oct 2026, 18:20
77,944
-91
28 Oct 2026, 17:11
78,035
-86
27 Oct 2026, 19:56
78,121
-65
26 Oct 2026, 16:27
78,186
-107
25 Oct 2026, 14:50
78,293
-91
24 Oct 2026, 15:51
78,384
-103
23 Oct 2026, 13:29
78,487
-73
22 Oct 2026, 15:27
78,560
-120
21 Oct 2026, 08:29
78,680
-78
20 Oct 2026, 07:19
78,758
-119
19 Oct 2026, 08:39
78,877
-135
18 Oct 2026, 06:27
79,012
first reading
Engagement
291 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 291 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
91,418 reactions across 287 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
57,308
62.7%
👍
19,748
21.6%
🙏
13,419
14.7%
👎
943
1.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 291 of the 291 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92,133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 291 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
-
همین مطالب رو بعضاً میان در قالب یک سمینار چند ساعته با هزینه چند میلیونی براتون مثل یک خبرنگار سناریو بندی میکنند که آخرش هم هیچ کدوم از شرکت کنندگان دوره نمیدونن که باید چه کاری انجام بدن ...
همیشه شخصاً سعی کردم شفاف و به صورت تک سناریو اعضای کانال رو راهنمایی کنم امیدوارم براتون مفید واقع بشه .
@Behnampaydar_ir✅️
سوال : در صورت وقوع جنگ آیا دلار مجدد مثل سری قبل اصلاح میکنه ؟
جواب : به نظر من اگه جنگی رخ بدهد اینسری دلار بر خلاف جنگ قبلی رشد میکنه .
سوال : در مقطع فعلی به سهام ورود میکنید ؟
جواب : خیر من در مقطع فعلی اصلا چنین ریسکی نمیکنم .
سوال : آقای پایدار میخوام طلا فروشی بزنم ، توصیه تو این راه برام دارید ؟ و اینکه با چقدر طلا شروع کنم بهتره ؟
جواب : برای باز کردن مغازه طلا فروشی اولین و مهم ترین کار اینکه برید حد…
نتایج اعضای کانال ویژه از معامله امروز انس جهانی طلا اونم با دلار 2,500,000 ریالی !!!
مجدد خدمتتون عرض میکنم که لطفاً با دیدن این سود ها برداشت هیجانی نداشته باشید ، به این سادگی که پیام ها رو مشاهده میکنید سود ساخته نشده ، کار بسیار سنگینیه ...
@Behnampaydar_ir✅️
به بیانی عزیزانی که میخوان از صفر آموزش ارزدیجتال ، فارکس و یاد گیری تحلیل تکنیکال برای بازار فارکس ، ارز ، طلا و... ببینند و همچنین تو معامله گری بازار های جهانی و داخلی در کنار ما باشند میتونن با یه هزینه خیلی کم و اقتصادی با کلی خدمات آموزشی عضویت دوره سی روزه ارز ، طلا و سهام رو دریافت کنند .
چون مشخص نیست امسال مجدد قسمت بشه این دوره رو برگذار کنیم یا نه به خاطر همین با اینکه متاسفانه خیلی خیلی به مبلغ کتاب اضا…
آخرین دوره ای هم که برگزار کردیم برمیگرده به دو ماه پیش که اعضای محترم برای دوره سی روزه آموزشی و معامله گری بازار های مالی ارزدیجتال ، فارکس و... هزینه خیلی پایینی رو پرداخت کردن ، البته لازم به ذکره که ما هم برای همین اعضای محترم کانال در کنار آموزش و پشتیبانی به هر کدوم سه جلد کتاب فیزیکی در رابطه با توسعه فردی و اقتصادی به صورت هدیه ارسال کردیم .
چون قیمت این دوره معقوله و خدماتش چه از لحاظ آموزشی ، معامله گری و…
بعضی از دوستان بابت آموزش بازار های مالی از مقدمات ازم سوال میپرسن و همچنین از شرایط ثبت نام تو کانال ویژه.
اطلاع دارین که هزینه اشتراک کانال ویژه ما ۵۰ تتره که بیشتر به درد عزیزانی میخوره که حداقل مقدمات مثل کار با بروکر و مدیریت سرمایه رو بلد باشند .
اما بر خلاف کانال ویژه ما برای آموزش بازار های مالی اصلا شهریه بالای رو نمیگیریم ، اونایی که چندین ساله عضو چنل ما هستن هم شاهد این موضوع هستند.
اگه یادتون باشه ما…
Showing the 12 most recent of 291 posts we hold for @Behnampaydar_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 79 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Behnampaydar_ir named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@metagold named in 6 posts, 3 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
هاتف سیدپور @hatef_invest · 151,839 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
نرخ طلا و ارز @NerkhTv1 · 170,533 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 12 August 2026
Hamed Kiani | حامد کیانی @hamed_kianiiii · 38,928 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
شَریف کابیتال | SHARIF @sharifcapitall · 69,606 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
قیمت لحظهای طلا دلار سکه @nerkhzani · 51,509 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
Serna trading | وی آی پی رسمی @bitwhallee · 2,024 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
آموزش و عیب یابی خودرو @diadcarman · 107,085 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
EcoKhavand | اکوخاوند @eco_khavand · 119,079 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“چَنل اقتصادی | بهنام پایدار” (@Behnampaydar_ir), 77,996 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Behnampaydar_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.