#SI/USDT به حمایت مهمی رسیده واگرایی مثبت خوبی هم داره احتمال برگشت وجود داره این میمکوین پتانسیل خوبی برای پدیده شدن داره

Channel
بی حاشیه
@bihashiye_bazar
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,702subscribers
-177 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001228417799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bihashiye_bazar |
| Description | آسمان فرصت پرواز بلند است ولی/ قصه این است چه اندازه کبوتر باشی.. آرشیو تحلیلها و دستنوشتههای شخصی کانال تحلیلی آموزشی، ادبی انگیزشی روانشناسی |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bihashiye_bazar |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
@bihashiye_bazar was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:14 | 12,702 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:10 | 12,708 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:11 | 12,704 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:06 | 12,705 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:51 | 12,704 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 12,703 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 12,701 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 12,707 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:14 | 12,710 | +5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 12,705 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:15 | 12,707 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:11 | 12,711 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 12,716 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 12,718 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:26 | 12,720 | +2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 12,718 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 12,722 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:51 | 12,729 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:14 | 12,730 | +3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 12,727 | first reading |
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 48.6%
- avg views ÷ 12,702 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,170
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 111,080 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 08:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,700
- Videos
- ≈522
- Links
- ≈869
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 55m
- Average length
- 1h 55m
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
☝️به موقع و سر بزنگاه بود کریپتو و اونس جهانی طلا و نقره رشد کردن و نفت ریخت
کارزار درخواست تسریع در پرداخت وجوه کاربران صرافی کریپتولند 👇 https://www.karzar.net/357604 این کارزار رو محبت کنید امضا کنید تعدادی از کاربران کریپتولند درخواست داشتن که در کانال بذاریم تا ازشون حمایت بشه و زودتر مطالباتشون پرداخت بشه انشالا زودتر این اتفاق بیفته
🇺🇸 ترامپ: قیمت نفت بیشتر کاهش خواهد یافت، زیرا ما در مذاکرات با ایران به موفقیتهایی دست یافتهایم. ببینید پدرسوخته هفت خط که استاد تمام بازی روانی هست چجوری در آستانه روز انتخابات آمریکا با خبرسازی قیمت نفت رو اینجوری پائین آورد
#XAU #GOLD ☝️طبق تحلیل قبلی، روند کلی اونس جهانی طلا احتمالا همچنان نزولی هست تا رسیدن به حداقل یکی از دو سطح تعیین شده و هر نوسان رو به بالایی صرفا یک ریزموج در روند نزولی خواهد بود
☝️یک سری اخباری از مذاکرات اومد و ترامپ زبل با این خبرسازیها توی شب انتخابات نفت رو یه ریزش ده درصدی بهش داد و آوردش حوالی صد دلار در آینده چه خواهد شد؟ همه اینا موقتی و یک وقفه و فریب تاکتیکی هست ممکنه نفت ده دوازده دلار دیگه هم با این خبرسازیها و خبردرمانیها پایین بیاد اما خب باز جنگ قطعی هست مگر معجزهای اتفاق بیفته بالاهای اونس جهانی طلا هم صرفا یک نوسان رو به بالا در روند نزولی هست و در نهایت احتمالا نفت به…
این اتفاق یه فرصت تنفس خیلی خوبی هست که یه آلتکوین جذاب با مارکت کپ کوچک و روایت بکر، مثل SI بتونه ظرف همین دو سه هفته یه رشد خیلی خوب بکنه
احتمال داره یه مدتی اخبار مثبتی در زمینه مذاکرات و توافق بیاد و حتی بگن توافق هم شده به بهانه این اخبار بازار کریپتو و اونس جهانی نقره و طلا یه رشد بکنن و نفت یه ریزش بکنه چون نموداری هم این چیزا محتمل هست اما میدونیم که همه اینا احتمالا موقتی خواهد بود و در واقع هیچ توافق پایداری شکل نخواهد گرفت، با این کارا دو طرف فقط دارن زمان میخرن تا اون نبرد نهایی رو که ناگزیر اتفاق خواهد افتاد رو کمی به تعویق بنیندازن مجدد …
سخن معروف و درستی هست که میگه ضرر قمارخونه رو فقط خودش میتونه جبران کنه ضرر بازار مالی رو فقط خودش میتونه جبران کنه ضرر کریپتو رو هم فقط خود کریپتو میتونه جبران کنه کریپتویی که میتونه یه ضرر ۹۰ تا ۹۵ درصدی رو ایجاد کنه، همون کریپتو میتونه رشدهای بزرگ چند ده برابری و چند صد برابری به شما بده و اینا کاملا ممکنه و قبلا بارها و بارها اتفاق افتاده و فقط در بازار کریپتو این بازدهیها میتونه رقم بخوره فقط ممکنه در ح…
#SI این پایین میتونه در حکم پولبک به ترند نزولی شکستهشده باشه خط روندی که از سقف شکل گرفته و اعتبار زیادی داره این رمزارز با توجه به روایت جذاب و بکری که داره امکان یک رشد خیلی خوب تا مارکتکپ ۴۰۰-۳۰۰ میلیون دلار رو داره و این رشد میتونه به صورت شارپ و انفجاری در زمان کوتاهی صورت بگیره این احتمال وجود داره که این میمکوین قبل CAW پروژه بشه اینکه روی مارکت ۱۰ میلیون دلار تونسته ۵۰ هزار هولدر داشته باشه یعنی به …
#SI از مقاومت اعلام شده تا محدوده ۱۰ اصلاح داشت چنین اصلاحاتی در چنین رمزارزهای پرنوسانی کاملا طبیعی هست و چنین توکنهایی میتونن حرکات بزرگ بزنن این رمزارز حرکات تیز و شارپی داره، چه در رشد و چه در ریزش
#BTC آپدیت ZOOM از ۸۵ هزار تا ۷۶ هزار ریخت در ادامه احتمالا از همین نواحی یا مقداری پائینتر یک حرکت صعودی تا ۹۳ هزار خواهد داشت
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @bihashiye_bazar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @bihashiye_bazar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 45 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@bihashiye_bazar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 16 August 2026 · confirmed gone 19 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Naghash69_Rtb · 21,382
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
@economy_reza · 20,135
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 30 September 2026
@groundscanners · 15,381
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 26 September 2026
@Boursearzandeh · 25,502
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 19 September 2026
@Mosbat_sabz · 35,956
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@famatake · 21,003
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@hajme_sabzzz · 38,059
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
@ghadremotlagh · 76,867
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
@tajikmira · 33,793
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@soltanboure · 25,427
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@Mreza_Danaei · 19,177
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 October 2026
@Nima_danaii · 18,841
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
@Mohammadjavadhosseinii · 500
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
@uns_invest · 26,702
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 September 2026
@tablobaziii · 31,284
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
@Moderyatsarmae · 36,923
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 September 2026
@trading1room · 22,696
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
@whalesview · 25,106
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
@cryptouniversity0 · 18,588
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 October 2026
@shakhesesabz · 32,295
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@mohsen_tahlil · 39,150
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 21 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بی حاشیه” (@bihashiye_bazar), 12,702 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bihashiye_bazar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.