📅 تاریخ : 1405/08/19 🔰 اخابر 🔰 گروه : مخابرات 💠 نوع : momentum + alligator 💲 مقدار پایانی : 1,207 ریال ⚠️ قبل از هر تصمیمی در خرید و فروش، در خصوص شکست عمدی یا واقعی حد ضرر، ورود و خروج نقدینگی و شرایط بنیادی سهم تحقیق نمایید. 🆔 @IndependentThinking 🆔 @b3bourse_bot 💻 app.ashkbous.com 🌐 tahlilapp.com

Channel
پویش تفکر مستقل
@IndependentThinking
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,421subscribers
+2,067 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001101402144 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @IndependentThinking |
| Description | نوشته های اشکبوس شرفی مرجع تخصصی ارزیابی ریسک سهام بازار سرمایه نظرات، شخصی می باشد و نباید مبنای معاملات قرار گیرد. هماهنگی تبلیغات @mahsa_sheybani Endeavor Overcomes Destiny |
| Created | 6 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/IndependentThinking |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 10:16 | 15,421 | -2 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 18:48 | 15,423 | -9 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 15:01 | 15,432 | +3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:18 | 15,429 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:07 | 15,435 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:20 | 15,449 | +8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:16 | 15,441 | +12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:39 | 15,429 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:06 | 15,430 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:08 | 15,440 | +11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:11 | 15,429 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 15,435 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:28 | 15,441 | -12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:26 | 15,453 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 15,461 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 15,473 | +7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 15,466 | +15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:59 | 15,451 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:29 | 15,455 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 15,459 | first reading |
Engagement
192 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.1%
- avg views ÷ 15,421 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,480
- 85 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 85
- of 192 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 192 (26 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 211,066 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 06:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,950
- Videos
- ≈594
- Links
- ≈2,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5m 31s
- Average length
- 1m 06s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 22 of 85 posts held from the last 30 days (25.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اگر از ۱ شهریور کمتر از ۳۵ درصد بازدهی داشتید، می تونید پرتفوی خودتون رو به مجموعه سبدگردان آریا بسپرید. گزارش هاشون از عملکرد شاخص بسیار بهتر بوده.
📢 فراخوان همکاری با سرمایهگذاران بزرگ بازار سرمایه 💼 سرمایهتان را به مدیریت تخصصی بسپارید؛ زمانتان را صرف اولویتهای مهمتر کنید. 🔹 ویژه سرمایهگذاران با سرمایه بیش از ۵ میلیارد تومان آیا فرصت کافی برای رصد روزانه بازار، بررسی گزارشهای مالی، تحلیل صنایع و مدیریت مستمر پرتفوی خود دارید؟ در بازار سرمایه، تنها انتخاب سهم اهمیت ندارد؛ نحوه تخصیص دارایی، مدیریت ریسک و تصمیمگیری در زمان مناسب نیز نقش مهمی در مسیر سر…
💫 دوره مقدماتی و پیشرفته رصد جریان نقدینگی اگر سوالی در مورد ۱۶ ساعت آموزش خرید و فروش بر مبنای جریان نقدینگی که به صورت رایگان در اختیار دوستان قرار گرفته دارید، به شخص بنده پیام بدید. 🆔 @ashkbous1 بنده معتقدم بعد از این آموزش، شما از ۹۹ درصد اساتید برتر بازار سرمایه بهتر تحلیل خواهید کرد. ✅ این همون دوره ای هست که یک گردش مالی چند میلیاردی بدون رعایت مالکیت فکری برای ۲۹ سایت داشت و از وقتی رایگان شد، عزیزان از …
غمارگ پیش از گزارش آیا اینسهم راه غبشهر را خواهد رفت؟ 🆔 @IndependentThinking
نسخه کامل تر رصد خروج نقدینگی ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۹ ✅داده خام ربات جریان نقدینگی ✅میانگین ۵ روزه داده خام ✅داده خام ربات جریان نقدینگی با دلار روز ✅و تعدیل شده عملکردی؛ میانگین ۵ روزه با دلار روز #کوتاه_مدتی 🆔 @independentThinking
رصد خروج نقدینگی بازار سرمایه ۱۴۰۵/۰۸/۱۹ 🟢 سبز: فشار خروج پایین؛ شرایط مساعدتر برای خرید پلهای و افزایش تدریجی ریسک. 🟡 زرد: فشار عادی تا متوسط؛ نگهداری، خرید انتخابی و پرهیز از معاملات هیجانی. 🟠 نارنجی: فشار خروج بالا؛ زمان مدیریت فعالتر ریسک، سبکسازی موقعیتهای پرریسک و حفظ بخشی از نقدینگی. 🔴 قرمز: فشار سنگین؛ خرید فقط با تأیید روند و تمرکز بیشتر بر مدیریت ریسک، نه خروج هیجانی. 🚨 قرمز تیره: ناحیه خطر؛ اولویت با …
بورس با اقبال ۱۵ برابری، رئیس سازمان متفاوتی میخواهد! ✍اشکبوس شرفی ۱۹ آبان ۱۴۰۵ آقای صیدی را میتوان یکی از محافظهکارترین رؤسای سازمان بورس در تاریخ بازار سرمایه ایران دانست. رویکردی که شاید در دوره رکود و بیاعتمادی، با هدف کنترل ریسک و مدیریت شرایط موجود دنبال شده باشد، اما پرسش اساسی این است: آیا همین الگوی مدیریتی برای بازاری که قرار است با موجی از ورود سرمایه و افزایش چندبرابری اقبال عمومی مواجه شود نیز کارآ…
جناب آقای دکتر همتی جناب آقای دکتر مدنی زاده سلام و احترام پیرو صحبتها و مطالب قبلی فلسفه دامنه نوسان سه درصد در تمام این ماهها چه بوده و اکنون چرا برقرار است؟ مگر قرار نبود این محدودیتها رفع شود و بازار همان مسیر قبل را ادامه دهد؟ در فاصله سالهای ١۴٠٠ تا ١۴٠٣ بازار مسیر خوبی در جهت اصلاح ریزساختارها طی کرد که همه را دنده عقب برگشت کرده است. این موضوعات را مورد توجه قرار دهید و اصلاح در دستور کار شورایعالی بو…
#غمارگ در گزارش ۶ماهه حسابرسی شده به سود ۱۲۵ ریالی رسیده بود در ۹ماهه این عدد به سود ۲۳۰ ریالی رسیده است.
📊 جهش؛ فراتر از شاخص، جلوتر از بازارها! 📈 از زمان بازگشایی بازار (۲۹ اردیبهشت ماه)، صندوق اهرمی جهش فارابی با ثبت بازدهی ۳۱۴ درصدی، عملکردی بالاتر از شاخص کل، طلا و دلار داشته است. ⬅️ بازدهی جهش در این دوره، ۳۵ درصد بالاتر از میانگین صندوقهای اهرمی بوده است. 🖥 خرید با جستوجوی نماد جهش در تمامی کارگزاریها 📲 ثبت سفارش در فارابیکسو: 🔗 https://ifrb.ir/jads __ 📞۱۵۶۱ 🆔@farabinvest
دلار همچنان بر همان مدار تحلیل https://t.me/IndependentThinking/24232
Showing the 12 most recent of 192 posts we hold for @IndependentThinking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@IndependentThinking edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 28 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 16 posts on @IndependentThinking as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@salarsafaie · 44,0892 postsMehdiafzalian
@Mehdiafzaliaan · 18,5671 postNimaAzadiP|پادکست های نیما آزادی
@NimaAzadiP · 22,1601 postگروه مالی فارابی
@farabinvest · 52,2351 postFundvesting | فاندوستینگ
@fundvesting · 18,0121 postKian Financial Group
@kianfinancialgroup · 7,0331 post"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی"
@m_robatii · 25,9801 postMohsen Chavoshi
@mohsenchavoshi · 234,8051 postگروه امین
@yaatim · 4,8591 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@salarsafaie · 44,0892 postsگروه امین
@yaatim · 4,8592 posts🇮🇷 حسین زمانی 🇮🇷بازار سرمایه🇮🇷
@bourse_hosein_zamani · 40,3711 postگروه مالی فارابی
@farabinvest · 52,2351 postFundvesting | فاندوستینگ
@fundvesting · 18,0121 postThink Independent
@independenthinking · 41 postگروه مالی کارآمد
@Karamadholding · 4,6151 postKian Financial Group
@kianfinancialgroup · 7,0331 postMehdiafzalian
@Mehdiafzaliaan · 18,5671 postmelobot | ربات موزیک ملوبات
@melobot · 928,2401 postNimaAzadiP|پادکست های نیما آزادی
@NimaAzadiP · 22,1601 postرصد بازار
@RasadBaz · 10,0511 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@salarsafaie · 44,089
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@amozeshbors98 · 55,921
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
@shakhesesabz · 32,276
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@gold_bashgah · 29,417
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
@bishuoori · 25,668
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
@m_robatii · 25,980
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
@NAVSTOCK · 32,928
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@MohsenHasanlu · 26,620
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
@vahidkeshmirypour · 26,903
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
@SignalRaygan_Afagh · 30,021
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@mortezaebad · 50,750
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@aragh_khorha · 36,341
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 September 2026
@hajme_sabzzz · 38,132
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
@MarketSummary · 21,170
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
@sinarahbarshahlan · 26,174
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
@mahdy_mirzaiie · 27,543
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
@OptionBaaz · 19,198
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026
@Fundbase_ir · 76,412
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@InvestmentMind · 24,660
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@permanet5160 · 64,194
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
@sahamyaab · 29,742
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@Mosbat_sabz · 36,003
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@etfplus · 29,706
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@Identify_Movements · 33,595
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پویش تفکر مستقل” (@IndependentThinking), 15,421 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IndependentThinking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.