Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده

Channel

فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده

@fardaname

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,484subscribers

+702 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001431714829
TypeChannel
Username@fardaname
Description🔸 تحلیل سرمایه‌گذاری در سهام و سایر دارایی‌های مالی 🔸 ارائه پیشنهادات برای ترید بهتر ■ ادمین تلگرام @Gandom_mediaa ■ سايت fardaname.com ■ شبکه‌های اجتماعی urls.st/Fardanameh
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fardaname

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,77124,48424,127.55 August 2026 — 23,782 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,782 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,781 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,774 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,771 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,789 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,806 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,838 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,834 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,835 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,836 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,952 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,967 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,009 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,022 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,027 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,028 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,044 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,051 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,061 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,075 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,080 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,099 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,101 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,115 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,127 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,219 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,246 subscribers5 September 2026 — 24,267 subscribers8 September 2026 — 24,333 subscribers11 September 2026 — 24,349 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,351 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,406 subscribers17 September 2026 — 24,446 subscribers19 September 2026 — 24,443 subscribers26 September 2026 — 24,484 subscribers5 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net +702. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,664–24,591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 07:5524,484+41
19 Sept 2026, 08:1824,443-3
17 Sept 2026, 01:2124,446+40
14 Sept 2026, 23:1824,406+55
13 Sept 2026, 08:1924,351+2
11 Sept 2026, 10:3924,349+16
8 Sept 2026, 18:5724,333+66
5 Sept 2026, 14:5824,267+21
3 Sept 2026, 12:4024,246+27
2 Sept 2026, 06:5324,219+92
1 Sept 2026, 08:4524,127+12
31 Aug 2026, 11:0224,115+14
30 Aug 2026, 08:0424,101+2
29 Aug 2026, 09:1824,099+19
28 Aug 2026, 06:4524,080+5
27 Aug 2026, 08:3224,075+14
26 Aug 2026, 08:2624,061+10
25 Aug 2026, 11:3424,051+7
24 Aug 2026, 08:4424,044+16
22 Aug 2026, 19:3624,028first reading

Engagement

149 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.3%
avg views ÷ 24,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,710
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 149 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held149 (29 July 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total319,851
Reactions total3,500
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,900
Videos
≈57
Links
≈1,110

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 20s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,938 reactions across 149 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4,70843.0%
❤4,40740.3%
👌3963.62%
👎3112.84%
😁2762.52%
👏1971.80%
🔥1731.58%
😍1010.923%
😭950.869%
💔890.814%
🤯590.539%
❤‍🔥300.274%
😡290.265%
🤔290.265%
😢210.192%
😱100.091%
🎉70.064%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 149 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fardaname. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 149 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC773 views18 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

نمودار تجمیعی نیست، مقایسه‌ایه!!! 📉 @fardaname

❤9👍6😁2😡1

29 Sept 2026, 18:03 UTC998 views33 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

👀 چشمت تو بشقاب خودت باشه! بچه که بودیم، چون تعدادمون زیاد بود، یکی از چالش‌های همیشگی مادر، رقابت بین بچه‌ها برای گرفتن سهم بیشتر از غذا بود. برای همین، یک قانون اساسی سر سفره داشتیم: «چشمت تو بشقاب خودت باشه.» 👏 دعبید یه جوری گزارش خوب داده که انگار از خود صنعت دارو، که این روزها گزارش‌های خفنی می‌ده، هم خفن‌تر عمل کرده. حسن کاظم‌زاده 📉 @fardaname

😁22❤10👍1

29 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,450 views18 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

روی دیگر طلای آنلاین! 🟡 این ویدیو را اوایل تیرماه در اینستاگرام فردانامه منتشر کردیم. در آن زمان گفتیم که پشت تبلیغات گسترده پلتفرم‌های آنلاین طلا ممکن است مسائلی وجود داشته باشد که در آینده مشکل‌ساز شود. 🟡 اخباری که اخیراً منتشر شده، نشانه‌هایی از بروز برخی از همان مشکلاتی است که درباره آن‌ها هشدار داده بودیم. ⚠️ حتماً ویدیو را با دقت ببینید و پیش از استفاده از این پلتفرم‌ها، بررسی‌های لازم را انجام دهید. #طلا …

❤8😢5👍3😁1😭1

29 Sept 2026, 14:19 UTC≈3,510 views50 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🔵 پیوستگی ابطال روزانه در پالایش یکم 🟩 یکی از اهداف ریاست قبلی سازمان پس از معرفی، صفر کردن حباب پالایش یکم بود. وی موفق شد با اجبار مدیریت این صندوق به ابطال واحدها، نسبت P/NAV این صندوق بخشی منفعل را به صفر برساند. 🟩 اما پس از اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۲، این وعده هم به تاریخ پیوست و پس از آن حتی در دوران ریاست جدید و رشد صنعت، این نسبت با فعالیت حداقلی بازارگردان، عمدتا در محدوده ۷۰-۹۰ درصد نوسان کرده است. 🟩 بیش از ۸۵ درصد …

👍38❤4👏4🔥4

29 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,400 views52 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🟨 کالابرگ، وقتی ۱ میلیون تومان دیگر ۱ میلیون تومان نیست! 💬 بنا به گزارش مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس، کالابرگ ۱ میلیون تومانی از دی‌ماه سال قبل تا پایان مرداد (یعنی فقط ظرف ۷ ماه) بیش از ۴۰ درصد از قدرت خرید خود را از دست داده است. 💬 مرکز پژوهش‌ها برای این سنجش، یک سبد غذایی ۱۱ قلمی شامل برنج، روغن، ماست، پنیر، شیر، تخم‌مرغ، گوشت قرمز، مرغ، حبوبات، ماکارونی و قند و شکر را مبنا قرار داده که حداقل ۱۰۵۰ کیلوکالری روزانه را تأم…

❤39💔9👍4

29 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC≈3,330 views37 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🚨 بررسی گزارشات شهریورماه (ثلث دوم) 📊 در ادامه پست قبلی، مقایسه‌ای بین فروش دلاری شهریور ماه و میانگین فروش ماهانه سال جاری، بین حدود ۱۹۵ شرکت تولیدی که پس از پست اول گزارشات شهریور ماه را منتشر کرده‌اند، انجام شده است. ✍️ در صنایعی که بیش از ۵ شرکت گزارش داده‌اند، نساجی، مواد شیمیایی و خودرو توانسته‌اند بیشترین رشد را در شهریور ماه، گزارش نمایند. ✍️ همچنین صنایع تولید فلزات گرانبهای غیر آهنی، قطعات خودرو، لاستیک …

👍27❤8👏1🔥1

29 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC≈3,530 views81 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

#تحلیل_بازار 📊 👍 پرگردش و مثبت بورس امروز را مثبت آغاز کرد و با ثبت ارزش معاملات مطلوب ۴۴ همتی، در نهایت مثبت بسته شد. ۷۴ درصد از نمادها نیز در محدوده مثبت به کار خود پایان دادند. در انتهای معاملات، تقریباً ۱۷ همت تقاضای خرید روی تابلو باقی ماند. جو مثبت دلار و دلار رسمی، فعلاً چشم‌انداز صعودی بورس را تقویت کرده است و بسیاری از کسانی که نگران اصلاح بازار بودند، مجدداً اقدام به خرید سهام می‌کنند. تداوم گزارش‌های مط…

❤54👌13👍4👏4😭4😁1😡1

29 Sept 2026, 06:41 UTC≈4,030 views40 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🛑 نبرد نفتا و گاز در پتروشیمی! 🟦 نفتا و گاز طبیعی، دو خوراک مهم صنایع پتروشیمی هستند. 📈 در نمودار بالا، تغییرات نرخ نفتا و خوراک گازی پتروشیمی‌ها را مشاهده می‌کنیم. 🟦 همان‌طور که در نمودار مشخص است، اسپرد تولید در مجتمع‌های مبتنی بر خوراک گازی در حال کاهش و در مجتمع‌های مبتنی بر خوراک مایع در حال افزایش است. 🟦 این موضوع، به‌ویژه برای اسپرد محصولاتی که میان این دو نوع مجتمع مشترک هستند، اهمیت دارد. ✍️امین آموزش …

👍22❤11👏3🔥2👌1💔1

29 Sept 2026, 04:45 UTC≈4,230 views26 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

🟨 حراج ۲۶، بدون خرید قطعی 🟥 پس از ۲ حراج پیاپی و خرید قطعی بانک مرکزی که به ۲۱.۶ همت رسید، در حراج اخیر دیگر اثری از خرید قطعی نبود. بانک مرکزی اما مشابه هفته‌های گذشته، تنها ۷۰ همت از درخواست پول ۲۹۱ همتی بانک‌ها (معادل ۲۴ درصد) را اجابت کرد. 🟥 مانده بازار باز، همان ۷۰ همت است. میانگین ۳ ماهه این عدد حدود ۶۱ همت و میانگین یکسال اخیر، ۱۷۰ همت همت می‌باشد. این اعداد نشان از تخلیه فشار سیاست پولی در کوتاه‌مدت دارد. ا…

👍21❤4👌1

28 Sept 2026, 18:48 UTC≈4,880 views33 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Poll

امشب شما پیش بینی کنید به نظرتون نتیجه مذاکرات چی می‌شه؟🧐

  1. بازگشت به تفاهم19%
  2. شروع مجدد جنگ28%
  3. بی‌نتیجه54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤26😁4😭3

28 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC≈4,920 views29 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @GandomFinance

Posted without readable text

❤20👍6🔥2🎉1

28 Sept 2026, 13:34 UTC≈5,820 views67 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

⁉️ آیا رشد نرخ بهره، ترمز بورس را خواهد کشید؟ 🔴 نرخ بهره بدون ریسک پس از شکستن سقف هفته‌های گذشته، به محدوده ۴۲ درصدی رسید. سوال اینست که چرا این بار، رشد نرخ بهره نتوانسته مثل سال‌های پیش موجب عقب‌کشیدن بازارها شود؟ 🔴 همانطور که در نمودار پیوست مشاهده می‌شود، با رشد تورم به محدوده‌های بالای ۸۰ درصد، نرخ بهره حقیقی (حاصل تفریق تورم از نرخ بهره اسمی) به محدوده‌های کم سابقه منفی بیش از ۴۰ درصد رسیده! در این شرایط سپر…

❤40👍23🔥3😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @fardaname. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@fardaname edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Sept 2026, 18:48 UTCAnonymous Poll2,540 voters approx.

امشب شما پیش بینی کنید به نظرتون نتیجه مذاکرات چی می‌شه؟🧐

  1. بازگشت به تفاهم19%
  2. شروع مجدد جنگ28%
  3. بی‌نتیجه54%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTCAnonymous Poll1,670 voters approx.

⭕️ قسمت بعدی ذره‌بین فردانامه، بررسی چه صنعتی باشه؟

  1. دارو36%
  2. سیمان29%
  3. فولاد18%
  4. شیمیایی28%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

بتا سهم
@betasahm1 · 126,104
#1
پیکنیک تحلیل
@PiknikAnalyst · 113,947
#2
تحلیل کاربردی " هلالات "
@validhelalat · 67,555
#3
گنگ خواب دیده
@mortezaebad · 50,740
#4
توییتر_بورس
@twitter_bourse · 70,151
#5
پارسیس تحلیل
@parsistahlil · 50,306
#6
Behnam Samadi | بهنام صمدی
@BehnamSamadi_ir · 60,026
#7
پاراگراف‌
@rezayatee · 9,628
#8
اخبار بورس | Tse Press
@tsepress · 65,269
#9
سالار صفائی
@salarsafaie · 45,402
#10
CommoLady | کامولیدی
@CommoLady · 17,714
#11
ترید فاند
@trade_fundd · 24,652
#12
مجید مؤیدی -شاخص سبز-
@shakhesesabz · 32,261
#13
Fundvesting | فاندوستینگ
@fundvesting · 18,135
#14
Enigma Investing
@enigma_investing · 45,121
#15
مرکز تحلیل بنیادی
@tahlil_center · 24,640
#16
سید مهدی طباطبایی / حجم سبز
@hajme_sabzzz · 37,566
#17
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی"
@m_robatii · 22,426
#18
‌تحلیل‌ هیبریدی بازار سرمایه
@hybridanalysis · 5,183
#19
بازار پایه | نگاه تحلیلی به اقتصاد و بازارهای مالی |
@only_otc · 12,673
#20
آوای آگاه
@AgahMoshaver · 46,749
#21
تحلیل بنیادی
@tahlilbonyadi · 6,897
#22
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا
@etfplus · 29,312
#23
بورس‌ اتومات
@bourse_automation · 6,192
#24
بورس۲۴ | Bourse24
@bourse24ir · 77,949
#25
سینا رهبرشهلان
@sinarahbarshahlan · 26,003
#26
بنیادی کار
@bonyadi_kar · 19,018
#27
Investing Data
@investingdata · 4,052
#28
آرش مهراز - صندوق
@InvestmentMind · 25,025
#29
سبدگردان قلک
@Gholack_AMC · 4,686
#30
بتا 360
@betasahm360 · 7,553
#31
یادداشتهای تحلیلی هاشم ذوالفقاری
@hashemzolfaghari · 15,102
#32
مرجع صندوق‌‌های سرمایه‌گذاری
@Fundbase_ir · 73,430
#33
فاند پلاس
@fundplus1 · 28,028
#34
بورس در لحظه
@TSE_Data_Analyzer · 5,959
#35
توپولی
@topoli · 33,537
#36
نقاش(Rtb)
@Naghash69_Rtb · 20,902
#37
بیدار بورس
@bidarbourse · 27,470
#38
stock & options
@sstock_options · 22,441
#39
معاملات شخصی🎯
@mytradingstory · 7,051
#40
خلق ارزش
@valuecreationn · 3,176
#41
اکوایران
@ecoiran_webtv · 66,388
#42
اقوال الفلوس
@aghval_alfolos · 5,721
#43
پرویز خالقی
@permanet5160 · 63,679
#44
یادداشتهای اقتصادی مهدی طحانی
@mehditahani · 3,088
#45
روانشناسی بازار
@market_mentality · 5,368
#46
اردوان منتخب
@ardavan_montakhab · 7,379
#47
روز نوشت های همایون دارابی
@homauondarabi · 3,029
#48
Capital DNA
@Capital_DNA · 27,300
#49
تحلیل به جای تخیل - محمد نوربخش
@tahlilbezabansade · 11,923
#50
خلاصه بازار
@MarketSummary · 21,185
#51
روزنامه دنیای اقتصاد
@den_ir · 74,427
#52
دریچه‌ای رو به بازار سرمایه
@repositoriumm · 3,110
#53
Mehdiafzalian
@Mehdiafzaliaan · 18,458
#54
Fundamental Analysis Files / فایل‌های تحلیل بنیادی
@Fundomental · 3,971
#55
ديدگاه بنيادى در بازارهاى مالى
@fundamental_View · 29,230
#56
شناسایی تحرکات
@Identify_Movements · 35,147
#57
Tahlilak
@tahlilak · 13,296
#58
بلومبرگ فارسی
@persiannbloomberg · 108,802
#59
ذهن خاکستری
@nuancedthinking · 9,778
#60
كانال تحليل كارگزاري بارز
@ebarez · 14,461
#61
کهنمویی
@kahnamoue · 4,905
#62
Hossein Abdoh Tabrizi
@HosseinAbdohTabrizi · 13,080
#63
BourseNews | بورس نیوز
@BourseNews · 60,309
#64
سبدگردان مانی شهر | M A N I S H A H R
@manifunds · 2,771
#65
SenaNews سنانیوز
@sena_news · 12,308
#66
FundoChart|فاندو چارت
@fundochart · 3,267
#67
سرمایه‌گذاری ارزشی “اسکینی”
@eskini_vi · 7,411
#68
پیام الیاس کردی | Payam Elyaskordi
@PayamElyaskordi · 123,809
#69
بیت‌گاید
@SatoshiSchool · 6,067
#70
پویان مظفری|اقتصاد-سرمایه‌گذاری
@pouyaninvestment · 16,132
#71
ميلاد موسوى
@MiladMousavi_Trader · 4,880
#72
آرشیو گزارشات بازار سرمایه
@ArchivesBourse · 2,286
#73
محسن نظری تحلیل تکنوفاندامنتال
@mohsentm2500 · 8,346
#74
💠 سامان تحلیل 💠
@Samantahlil · 14,981
#75
BahmanNameh
@BahmanNameh · 4,147
#76
یادداشت های تحلیلی دلجویی
@hdeljouee · 14,233
#77
گروه مالی فیروزه | Firouzeh
@firouzeh · 44,348
#78
« بورس و اقتصاد »
@hamian_bourse · 32,174
#79
شبکه کارشناسان ارزشگذاری
@irvaluation · 9,964
#80
اختیارمعامله 𝑶𝒑𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑹𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆
@optionreference · 11,732
#81
Vahid Online وحید آنلاین
@vahidonline · 1,399,039
#82
Alireza.S
@cryptobyalireza · 37,126
#83
گراز وال استریت
@amuyesal · 8,322
#84
نوید خدایی | آموزش اختیار معامله - آپشن
@navidacademy_option · 15,502
#85
اقتصاد پولی - بانکی
@Interestratemoney · 3,782
#86
Somo | Persian
@SomoPersian · 7,261
#87
Finroad.ir
@FinRoad_option · 2,878
#88
تحلیلگر حرفه‌ای
@CER_Analyst · 8,338
#89
سلمان یزدانی| تجربه بازارهای آینده
@salmanyazdani · 2,372
#90
BBCPersian
@bbcpersian · 771,942
#91
رصد بازار
@RasadBaz · 9,745
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مرکز تحلیل بنیادی
@tahlil_center · 24,640
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
تحلیل کاربردی " هلالات "
@validhelalat · 67,555
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
آرش مهراز - صندوق
@InvestmentMind · 25,025
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
خلاصه بازار
@MarketSummary · 21,185
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Capital DNA
@Capital_DNA · 27,300
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
ترید فاند
@trade_fundd · 24,652
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
بیدار بورس
@bidarbourse · 27,470
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
گروه نوویرا | Novira Group
@noviraco · 33,695
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Enigma Investing
@enigma_investing · 45,121
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا
@etfplus · 29,312
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
آوای آگاه
@AgahMoshaver · 46,749
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
پارسیس تحلیل
@parsistahlil · 50,306
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
گنگ خواب دیده
@mortezaebad · 50,740
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
مرجع صندوق‌‌های سرمایه‌گذاری
@Fundbase_ir · 73,430
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی"
@m_robatii · 22,426
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
شناسایی تحرکات
@Identify_Movements · 35,147
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
سالار صفائی
@salarsafaie · 45,402
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
توپولی
@topoli · 33,537
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
مرکز مبادله ایران
@IGCEIRAN · 27,033
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 September 2026
مرجع صندوق‌های طلا
@Fundbase_Gold · 38,851
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
کانال آموزشی پیشرفت مالی
@pishrafte2h · 45,798
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
stock & options
@sstock_options · 22,441
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
فاند پلاس
@fundplus1 · 28,028
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
NAV STOCK
@NAVSTOCK · 32,793
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 64 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده” (@fardaname), 24,484 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fardaname.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.