نمودار تجمیعی نیست، مقایسهایه!!! 📉 @fardaname
❤9👍6😁2😡1

Channel
@fardaname
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,484subscribers
+702 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001431714829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fardaname |
| Description | 🔸 تحلیل سرمایهگذاری در سهام و سایر داراییهای مالی 🔸 ارائه پیشنهادات برای ترید بهتر ■ ادمین تلگرام @Gandom_mediaa ■ سايت fardaname.com ■ شبکههای اجتماعی urls.st/Fardanameh |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fardaname |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 24,484 | +41 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 24,443 | -3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 24,446 | +40 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 24,406 | +55 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 24,351 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 24,349 | +16 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 24,333 | +66 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 24,267 | +21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 24,246 | +27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:53 | 24,219 | +92 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:45 | 24,127 | +12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 24,115 | +14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 24,101 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 24,099 | +19 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 24,080 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 24,075 | +14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 24,061 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 24,051 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 24,044 | +16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 24,028 | first reading |
149 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 149 (29 July 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 319,851 |
| Reactions total | 3,500 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10,938 reactions across 149 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4,708 | 43.0% | |
| ❤ | 4,407 | 40.3% | |
| 👌 | 396 | 3.62% | |
| 👎 | 311 | 2.84% | |
| 😁 | 276 | 2.52% | |
| 👏 | 197 | 1.80% | |
| 🔥 | 173 | 1.58% | |
| 😍 | 101 | 0.923% | |
| 😭 | 95 | 0.869% | |
| 💔 | 89 | 0.814% | |
| 🤯 | 59 | 0.539% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 0.274% | |
| 😡 | 29 | 0.265% | |
| 🤔 | 29 | 0.265% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 0.192% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 0.091% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 0.064% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 149 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fardaname. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 149 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
نمودار تجمیعی نیست، مقایسهایه!!! 📉 @fardaname
❤9👍6😁2😡1
👀 چشمت تو بشقاب خودت باشه! بچه که بودیم، چون تعدادمون زیاد بود، یکی از چالشهای همیشگی مادر، رقابت بین بچهها برای گرفتن سهم بیشتر از غذا بود. برای همین، یک قانون اساسی سر سفره داشتیم: «چشمت تو بشقاب خودت باشه.» 👏 دعبید یه جوری گزارش خوب داده که انگار از خود صنعت دارو، که این روزها گزارشهای خفنی میده، هم خفنتر عمل کرده. حسن کاظمزاده 📉 @fardaname
😁22❤10👍1
روی دیگر طلای آنلاین! 🟡 این ویدیو را اوایل تیرماه در اینستاگرام فردانامه منتشر کردیم. در آن زمان گفتیم که پشت تبلیغات گسترده پلتفرمهای آنلاین طلا ممکن است مسائلی وجود داشته باشد که در آینده مشکلساز شود. 🟡 اخباری که اخیراً منتشر شده، نشانههایی از بروز برخی از همان مشکلاتی است که درباره آنها هشدار داده بودیم. ⚠️ حتماً ویدیو را با دقت ببینید و پیش از استفاده از این پلتفرمها، بررسیهای لازم را انجام دهید. #طلا …
❤8😢5👍3😁1😭1
🔵 پیوستگی ابطال روزانه در پالایش یکم 🟩 یکی از اهداف ریاست قبلی سازمان پس از معرفی، صفر کردن حباب پالایش یکم بود. وی موفق شد با اجبار مدیریت این صندوق به ابطال واحدها، نسبت P/NAV این صندوق بخشی منفعل را به صفر برساند. 🟩 اما پس از اردیبهشت ۱۴۰۲، این وعده هم به تاریخ پیوست و پس از آن حتی در دوران ریاست جدید و رشد صنعت، این نسبت با فعالیت حداقلی بازارگردان، عمدتا در محدوده ۷۰-۹۰ درصد نوسان کرده است. 🟩 بیش از ۸۵ درصد …
👍38❤4👏4🔥4
🟨 کالابرگ، وقتی ۱ میلیون تومان دیگر ۱ میلیون تومان نیست! 💬 بنا به گزارش مرکز پژوهشهای مجلس، کالابرگ ۱ میلیون تومانی از دیماه سال قبل تا پایان مرداد (یعنی فقط ظرف ۷ ماه) بیش از ۴۰ درصد از قدرت خرید خود را از دست داده است. 💬 مرکز پژوهشها برای این سنجش، یک سبد غذایی ۱۱ قلمی شامل برنج، روغن، ماست، پنیر، شیر، تخممرغ، گوشت قرمز، مرغ، حبوبات، ماکارونی و قند و شکر را مبنا قرار داده که حداقل ۱۰۵۰ کیلوکالری روزانه را تأم…
❤39💔9👍4
🚨 بررسی گزارشات شهریورماه (ثلث دوم) 📊 در ادامه پست قبلی، مقایسهای بین فروش دلاری شهریور ماه و میانگین فروش ماهانه سال جاری، بین حدود ۱۹۵ شرکت تولیدی که پس از پست اول گزارشات شهریور ماه را منتشر کردهاند، انجام شده است. ✍️ در صنایعی که بیش از ۵ شرکت گزارش دادهاند، نساجی، مواد شیمیایی و خودرو توانستهاند بیشترین رشد را در شهریور ماه، گزارش نمایند. ✍️ همچنین صنایع تولید فلزات گرانبهای غیر آهنی، قطعات خودرو، لاستیک …
👍27❤8👏1🔥1
#تحلیل_بازار 📊 👍 پرگردش و مثبت بورس امروز را مثبت آغاز کرد و با ثبت ارزش معاملات مطلوب ۴۴ همتی، در نهایت مثبت بسته شد. ۷۴ درصد از نمادها نیز در محدوده مثبت به کار خود پایان دادند. در انتهای معاملات، تقریباً ۱۷ همت تقاضای خرید روی تابلو باقی ماند. جو مثبت دلار و دلار رسمی، فعلاً چشمانداز صعودی بورس را تقویت کرده است و بسیاری از کسانی که نگران اصلاح بازار بودند، مجدداً اقدام به خرید سهام میکنند. تداوم گزارشهای مط…
❤54👌13👍4👏4😭4😁1😡1
🛑 نبرد نفتا و گاز در پتروشیمی! 🟦 نفتا و گاز طبیعی، دو خوراک مهم صنایع پتروشیمی هستند. 📈 در نمودار بالا، تغییرات نرخ نفتا و خوراک گازی پتروشیمیها را مشاهده میکنیم. 🟦 همانطور که در نمودار مشخص است، اسپرد تولید در مجتمعهای مبتنی بر خوراک گازی در حال کاهش و در مجتمعهای مبتنی بر خوراک مایع در حال افزایش است. 🟦 این موضوع، بهویژه برای اسپرد محصولاتی که میان این دو نوع مجتمع مشترک هستند، اهمیت دارد. ✍️امین آموزش …
👍22❤11👏3🔥2👌1💔1
🟨 حراج ۲۶، بدون خرید قطعی 🟥 پس از ۲ حراج پیاپی و خرید قطعی بانک مرکزی که به ۲۱.۶ همت رسید، در حراج اخیر دیگر اثری از خرید قطعی نبود. بانک مرکزی اما مشابه هفتههای گذشته، تنها ۷۰ همت از درخواست پول ۲۹۱ همتی بانکها (معادل ۲۴ درصد) را اجابت کرد. 🟥 مانده بازار باز، همان ۷۰ همت است. میانگین ۳ ماهه این عدد حدود ۶۱ همت و میانگین یکسال اخیر، ۱۷۰ همت همت میباشد. این اعداد نشان از تخلیه فشار سیاست پولی در کوتاهمدت دارد. ا…
👍21❤4👌1
امشب شما پیش بینی کنید به نظرتون نتیجه مذاکرات چی میشه؟🧐
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤26😁4😭3
Posted without readable text
❤20👍6🔥2🎉1
⁉️ آیا رشد نرخ بهره، ترمز بورس را خواهد کشید؟ 🔴 نرخ بهره بدون ریسک پس از شکستن سقف هفتههای گذشته، به محدوده ۴۲ درصدی رسید. سوال اینست که چرا این بار، رشد نرخ بهره نتوانسته مثل سالهای پیش موجب عقبکشیدن بازارها شود؟ 🔴 همانطور که در نمودار پیوست مشاهده میشود، با رشد تورم به محدودههای بالای ۸۰ درصد، نرخ بهره حقیقی (حاصل تفریق تورم از نرخ بهره اسمی) به محدودههای کم سابقه منفی بیش از ۴۰ درصد رسیده! در این شرایط سپر…
❤40👍23🔥3😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @fardaname. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@fardaname edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
امشب شما پیش بینی کنید به نظرتون نتیجه مذاکرات چی میشه؟🧐
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⭕️ قسمت بعدی ذرهبین فردانامه، بررسی چه صنعتی باشه؟
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 64 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فردانامه _حسن کاظمزاده” (@fardaname), 24,484 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fardaname.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.