Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115,289–115,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 12:04
115,317
-52
11 Aug 2026, 09:23
115,369
-22
10 Aug 2026, 12:15
115,391
-34
9 Aug 2026, 12:34
115,425
-54
8 Aug 2026, 09:18
115,479
-13
7 Aug 2026, 12:37
115,492
-14
6 Aug 2026, 13:30
115,506
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 115,317 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,000
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.648%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
49 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
585,640
Reactions total
3,796
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,000
Videos
≈493
Links
≈685
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,796 reactions across 49 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,904
76.5%
👍
747
19.7%
👎
88
2.32%
💯
40
1.05%
😍
17
0.448%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,796reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐋 نهنگهای Chainlink دوباره فعال شدن!
طی ۲۴ ساعت گذشته، ۲۴۶ تراکنش بالای ۱۰۰ هزار دلار در شبکه Chainlink ثبت شده؛ بالاترین سطح فعالیت نهنگها در ۵ ماه اخیر
نکته مهمتر اینه که کیفپولهای بزرگ بین ۱۰۰K تا ۱۰M LINK حالا حدود ۴۶۶.۳ میلیون LINK دارن؛ یعنی نزدیک ۴۶.۶٪ کل عرضه
📌 پس ماجرا فقط جابهجایی نیست؛ موجودی نهنگها هم بالاست و این میتونه نشون بده سرمایهگذاران بزرگ دوباره دارن LINK رو جدیتر دنبال میکنن.
از ط…
📉فشار فروش روی بیتکوین داره کمکم آروم میشه
بر اساس شاخص Seller Exhaustion Constant (30D) هنوز اون الگوی تاریخی که معمولا در نزدیکی کفهای مهم بازار دیده میشه تأیید نشده
فروشندهها در حال ضعیف شدن هستن، اما هنوز نشونه کافی برای اینکه بگیم فشار فروش به کف نهایی خودش رسیده وجود نداره
👈بنابراین فعلا باید منتظر موند و دید آیا فشار فروش بیشتر کاهش پیدا میکنه یا نه چون تأیید این شاخص میتونه یکی از سیگنالهای مهم برای…
🔴تورم ماهانه طبق انتظارات رشد کرده و به 0.1% رسیده
🟢تورم سالانه ،طبق انتظارات اومده پایین از 3.5% به 3.4% رسیده
برای بازار های ریسکی تا حدودی مثبت بود
🆔@AlirezaMehrabi_com
⭕️آپدیت
🐋نهنگ های سلر هایپرلیکویید که دیروز پستشون رو براتون گذاشتیم همچنان دارن به پوزیشن های شورت خودشون حجم اضافه میکنن و انگار الان حتی بیشتر از قبل منتظر ریزش هستن
این نهنگ ها الان مجموعا 343 میلیون دلار پوزیشن شورت دارن و فقط یکی از این نهنگ ها به تنهایی پوزیشن شورتش رو به حجم 114 میلیون دلار رسونده که الان بیشترین حجم پوزیشن بیتکوین توی هایپرلیکوییده و بخاطر همین حسابی توجه همه رو جلب کرده
🐋آدرس نهنگ ها👇🏻
…
⏰امروز ساعت 16:00 دادههای تورم آمریکا منتشر میشه
📊 CPI %قبلی: 3.5
🎯 پیشبینی بازار: 3.4٪
این داده میتونه روی مسیر نرخ بهره و در نتیجه روی کریپتو و بازارهای ریسکی تأثیر زیادی بذاره
🔴 بالاتر از 3.4% فشار بیشتر روی بازار و احتمال واکنش منفی
🟢 پایینتر از 3.4% خبر خوب برای بازار و احتمال رشد
🟡 برابر با 3.4% احتمال واکنش خنثی یا نوسانی
👈عدد CPI امروز میتونه یکی از مهمترین محرکهای کوتاهمد…
🚨 هک بزرگ Harmony؛ ۴ میلیارد توکن ONE بدون اجازه ساخته شد!
پروژه Harmony اعلام کرده در اثر یک آسیبپذیری، حدود ۴ میلیارد توکن $ONE بهصورت غیرمجاز ایجاد شده؛ یعنی چیزی حدود ۲۶٪ از عرضه توکن
بخش بزرگی از این توکنها هم به سمت صرافیها منتقل شده و همین موضوع باعث شد قیمت ONE تا بیش از ۳۰٪ سقوط کند و به کف تاریخی جدید برسه
اگر این توکنهای تازهساختهشده وارد بازار و فروخته بشن، فشار فروش روی ONE میتواند بیشتر بشه
…
📊 بیتکوین بالا میره، اما فعلا یه جای کار میلنگه!
بخشی از رشد فعلی بیتکوین از بازار فیوچرز و پوزیشنهای اهرمی میاد، نه از خرید واقعی در بازار اسپات
این موضوع مهمه چون رشدهای پایدار معمولا وقتی شکل میگیرن که هم اسپات و هم فیوچرز همزمان تقویت بشن
نمونه مشابهش رو در آوریل دیدیم؛ قیمت بالا رفت، اما چون خرید واقعی اسپات پشتش نبود، این رشد دوام زیادی نداشت
👈پس برای ادامه صعود، یکی از مهمترین چیزهایی که باید ببینیم …
❗️بیتکوین داره از سهام جدا میشه؟
رابرت میچنیک از بلکراک میگه نگاه بازار به بیتکوین تغییر کرده و نکته جالب اینه که بیتکوین در جریان افت بخش AI در ماه جولای، بهتر از سهام عمل کرده
فعلا دو سیگنال مثبت داریم:
▪️ بیتکوین در برابر افت سهام مقاومت بیشتری نشون داده
▪️ سرمایه قابلتوجهی همچنان از طریق ETFها وارد بیتکوین میشه
این میتونه نشون بده تقاضای نهادی هنوز قویه و اگر ورود پول به ETFها در هفتههای آینده ادامه…
🐋نبرد نهنگ های خریدار و فروشنده هایپرلیکویید بیتکوین داره جدی میشه❓️امروز چندتا از نهنگ های تریدر هایپرلیکویید با حجم و اهرم های بالا وارد پوزیشنهای سنگین روی بیتکوین شدن و اینکارشون توجه همه رو جلب کرده
🔴شورت : 4 معاملهگر در مجموع 3,895 بیتکوین به ارزش حدود 249 میلیون دلار شورت گرفتن و قیمت لیکوییدیشن این پوزیشنها بین 64.6k تا 66.5K قرار داره
🟢لانگ : 3 تا نهنگ تریدر دیگه هم مجموعاً 114 میلیون دلار لانگ دارن…
📊هولدرهای بلندمدت هنوز در حال کاهش موجودی بیتکوین
👈بررسیها نشون میده انباشت بیتکوین ادامه داره، اما هنوز اونقدر قوی نیست که کاهش موجودی BTC در دست هولدرهای بلندمدت (LTH) رو متوقف کنه
🆔@AlirezaMehrabi_com
👈تعداد آدرسهای فعال اتریوم در ۲۴ ساعت به حدود ۹۸۹.۵ هزار آدرس رسیده ، بالاترین سطح فعالیت روزانه از ماه مارس
1️⃣بهتر شدن تقاضا برای ETFهای اسپات اتریوم
2️⃣فعالیتهای جدید روی شبکه
3️⃣رشد استیبلکوینها، داراییهای واقعی توکنیزهشده (RWA)
عواملی هستن که با این رشد کمک کردن به نظر میرسه بخشی از سرمایه و کیفپولهای قدیمی دوباره فعال شدن و کاربران دارن از شبکه اتریوم بیشتر استفاده میکنن
📌اگر این افزایش فعالیت…
❤38👍12👎2💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @alirezamehrabi_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 7,259 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
امیرمبیت | درآمد دلاری @amirambit · 185,594 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Saeed Feyzian | سعید فیضیان @saeedFeyzianFree · 368,272 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Atena khadem | آتنا خادم @atena_khadem_org · 183,932 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
امید فدوی | کریپتو، طلا و اقتصاد @omidfadavi_com · 162,356 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
کانال رسمی محمّد بصیری💚♾️ @mohammadbasiri · 146,403 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
BITFA ™️| بیتفا @bitfa · 223,509 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Rastad | راستاد @rastad · 437,683 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
🐋💸 جـریان پـول @JaryanPool · 1,777,313 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Arash analysis @arash_timess · 429,500 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Nobitex | نوبیتکس @nobitexmarket · 322,958 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Javad Trade ⚠️ @javadtrade11 · 246,397 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار بدون سانسور @ucn_ir · 170,605 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
رنه سینانی @renesinaniofficial · 232,519 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
"Iran_news" ایران نیوز @Iran_news_market · 246,901 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
TROON🔷محسن ترون @TROON · 1,094,516 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
CAR ONLINE @caronline · 420,622 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
کانال عرضه اولیه @Arzeh1avalieh · 193,089 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
CryptoSaba @cryptosaba · 202,095 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
MR_SIGNAL | ارز دیجیتال @mrsignal · 198,010 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Hoseini Finance @hoseini · 313,222 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
شریف | Sharif @ecoshariff · 3,374,037 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 August 2026
قبیله ققنوس | صفر تا صد بازار مالی @sokoon1111 · 230,338 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Shahryar_Rajaee کریپتو @Shahryaarrajaeecrypto · 513,742 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
پشت پرده - Poshteh Pardeh @poshtehpardehtv · 1,367,689 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alireza Mehrabi” (@alirezamehrabi_com), 115,317 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alirezamehrabi_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.