Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بنیادی کار

Channel

بنیادی کار

@bonyadi_kar

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,513subscribers

-3,296 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001807270724
TypeChannel
Username@bonyadi_kar
Descriptionبررسی و تحلیل گزارش‌های مالی و بررسی لیدرهای بازار و شرکت‌هایی که در عملکرد، سودآوری یا چشم‌انداز خود دستخوش تغییر و تحول بوده اند بنیادی کار همکاری با نهاد های مالی : @Parsa_roshann
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bonyadi_kar

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bonyadi_kar/14655 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 07:52 UTC@tahlil_center/162998 Nov 2026, 07:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@tahlil_center/1491410 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC@bonyadi_kar/13746 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC0.984 minutes
@bonyadi_kar/13880 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC@tahlil_center/1513326 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC0.9714 minutes
@codal_tahlil/1220291 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC@bonyadi_kar/14594 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 08:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@bonyadi_kar/13775 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC@codal_tahlil/12127516 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC0.9920 hours
@bonyadi_kar/13735 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC@codal_tahlil/1212108 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC0.984.9 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tahlil_center13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.983 minutesthis entry (7–6)
@codal_tahlil5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.997 minutesthis entry (4–1)
@Capital_DNA9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.8 hours@Capital_DNA (8–1)
@permanet51606 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutes@permanet5160 (5–1)
@Nima_danaii5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@Nima_danaii (4–1)
@twitter_bourse6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 minutesthis entry (5–1)
@tsepress5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0022 minutes@tsepress (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 285 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

17,51320,80919,1615 August 202614 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 100 days, net -3,296. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,019–21,303 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 09:2117,513-14
11 Nov 2026, 10:0017,527-18
9 Nov 2026, 13:4417,545-6
8 Nov 2026, 06:5117,551-9
6 Nov 2026, 22:4617,560-6
5 Nov 2026, 19:2117,566-6
4 Nov 2026, 16:3617,572-2
3 Nov 2026, 14:2517,574-1
2 Nov 2026, 16:3917,575-5
1 Nov 2026, 19:3017,580-12
31 Oct 2026, 17:1617,592-12
30 Oct 2026, 15:5617,604-10
29 Oct 2026, 19:0817,614-13
28 Oct 2026, 17:1017,627+1
27 Oct 2026, 20:0717,626-11
26 Oct 2026, 20:3817,637+8
25 Oct 2026, 20:0717,629-2
24 Oct 2026, 16:2917,631-3
23 Oct 2026, 14:2817,634-16
22 Oct 2026, 17:5817,650first reading

Engagement

304 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 17,513 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,280
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.236%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
99
of 304 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 94 of 99 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held304 (29 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total325,070
Reactions total731
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈9,210
Videos
≈76
Links
≈713

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,016 reactions across 295 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,02340.3%
❤1,78035.5%
👎4188.33%
👏3176.32%
😍1993.97%
😁961.91%
🔥561.12%
💔531.06%
😡190.379%
💯180.359%
😱180.359%
😢170.339%
🤝20.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 296 of the 304 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,016 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 304 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 99 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC≈2,610 views7 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚫️حباب صندوق‌های نقره 🔘کمترین حباب مربوط به صندوق پلاتا و بیشترین حباب مربوط به صندوق نقراط می‌باشد. 🟣حباب گواهی سپرده کالایی نقره ۱ ۱ درصد بوده و با دلار ۲۷۳ هزار تومانی معامله می‌شود. 🔘صندوق‌های نقره به طور میانگین با دلار ۲۸۰ هزار تومان معامله میشوند! 🟣در مجموع، حباب گواهی نقره نسبت به روز گذشته ۱ درصد رشد کرد. میانگین حباب کل صندوق ها هم ۴ درصد شد و نسبت به روز گذشته ۳ درصد رشد کرد. ✅کانال بنیادی کار @bonyad…

❤6👍1

14 Nov 2026, 11:23 UTC≈3,120 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚫️مس در مسیر پنجمین هفته نزولی 🔹مس در معاملات لندن و نیویورک به کف چهار ماه اخیر رسیده و در مسیر ثبت پنجمین افت هفتگی متوالی قرار گرفته است. 🔹نگرانی ‌ها درباره بخش هوش مصنوعی و بحران پیرامون انویدیا، تردیدها درباره سرعت سرمایه‌ گذاری در دیتاسنترها و زیرساخت‌های AI را افزایش داده که برای تقاضای مس اهمیت زیادی دارد. 🔹دلار قوی‌ تر و رشد بازده اوراق خزانه‌ داری آمریکا، تحت تاثیر تورم و چشم ‌انداز انقباضی‌ تر فدرال رزر…

❤8👍3💯1

14 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC≈2,880 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#ولغدر #گزارش_ماهانه 🔘درآمد مهر ۳۲.۷ میلیارد تومان که بالاترین فروش ماهانه در دو سال اخیر و رشد ۱۱۰.۷ درصدی نسبت به همین ماه سال قبل. 🟣عمده رشد از «سایر درآمد حاصل از عملیات لیزینگ» آمده که با ۲۵.۲ میلیارد تومان تقریبا کل درآمد ماه را ساخته و نسبت به ماه قبل چند برابر شده. 🔘در سمت مقابل، سود اقساط قراردادهای سال جاری روی ۳.۴۶ میلیارد تومان ثابت مانده و سود اقساط انتقالی از سال‌های گذشته هم طبق انتظار هست. 🔔گزارش …

❤5👍4

14 Nov 2026, 09:42 UTC≈3,060 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔻رشد ۳۴درصدی تقاضا در معاملات TAL 🔘ارزش تقاضا به حدود ۲.۴ همت رسید و ارزش معاملات نیز به حدود ۵۸۴ میلیارد تومان رسید همچنین عرضه‌ها نسبت به روز کاری گذشته ثابت بوده و به ۷۱۹ میلیارد تومان رسید. 🟣بیشترین ارزش تقاضا مربوط به شتران و مبین بود و بیشترین عرضه نیز در نمادهای وتجارت و شخارک رقم خورده و بیشترین ورود پول هم در جم و حفاری رخ داده. ✅کانال بنیادی کار @bonyadi_kar✅

❤4👍1👏1

14 Nov 2026, 06:37 UTC≈3,130 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔹 سبد سهامی متنوع در صندوق سرو صندوق‌های سهامی معمولا بیشترین وزن پرتفوی را به فملی تخصیص دادند و همین امر سبب شده تا از اصلاح سقف تاریخی فملی تا اینجا حدود ۱۵٪ اصلاح داشته باشند. در بین صندوق‌های سهامی، ترکیب پرتفوی صندوق سرو بهینه است و وزن یکسانی در بین سهم‌های بالای آن وجود دارد و تقریبا هم‌وزن هستند، این باعث شده تا این صندوق کم ریسک شود و در ریزش‌ها و اصلاح‌های بازار عملکرد مناسبی داشته باشد. بازدهی یکساله ص…

❤5

14 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈3,090 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔹پایین‌ترین سطح حباب منفی پادا 🔘صندوق‌های سهامی باتوجه به تنوع بخشی پرتفوی‌ای که دارند در اصلاحات و منفی‌های بازار کمتر اصلاح دارند و از ریسک‌های مختلف در امام هستند و برای سرمایه‌گذاران حقیقی کم ریسک بهتر است. 🟣صندوق پادا به جهت سرمایه گذاری در نمادهای فملی، تابان، فارس، فولاد و دالبر وضعیت مناسبی دارد و نقدشونگی بالا و معاملات روانی به دلبل فعالیت بازارگردان اختصاصی دارد. 🔘بازدهی یکساله پادا بیش از ۱۶۷درصد بوده.…

14 Nov 2026, 04:43 UTC≈3,320 views15 reactionsread 14 November 2026
File

📊 بررسی شغدیر، بازیگر PVC با چشم ‌انداز رشد سودآوری 🔹جایگاه شغدیر در صنعت PVC: پتروشیمی غدیر با ظرفیت اسمی ۱۲۰ هزار تن PVC، حدود ۱۵٪ از ظرفیت تولید PVC ایران و ۹٪ از ظرفیت خاورمیانه را در اختیار دارد. در بازار داخلی نیز شغدیر در کنار آبادان، بندرامام و اروند از تولیدکنندگان اصلی PVC محسوب میشود. 🔹جهش راندمان تولید: یکی از نقاط قوت شغدیر، روند بهبود راندمان تولید است. راندمان تولید PVC از ۹۱٪ در سال ۱۴۰۰ به ۱۰۴٪ در …

❤7👍7👎1

13 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC≈3,690 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔺 در اقتصاد تورمی امروز ایران، چطور می‌توان سرمایه‌گذاری دلاری کرد؟ 🔹در شرایط تورمی فعلی کشور، افزایش مداوم قیمت‌ها و کاهش قدرت خرید، حفظ ارزش دارایی را به یکی از دغدغه‌های اصلی سرمایه‌گذاران تبدیل کرده است. در چنین شرایطی، سرمایه‌گذاری دلاری می‌تواند علاوه بر حفظ دارایی ارزی، امکان کسب سود به دلار را نیز فراهم کند. 🔹مجموعه ترنج با همکاری بانک سامان در آستانه راه‌اندازی صندوق درآمد ثابت ارزی است که امکان سرمایه‌گذا…

❤10

Signed پارسا روشن

11 Nov 2026, 15:46 UTC≈3,780 views7 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔻ارزش معاملات بازارها در انتهای معاملات 🔘در این نمودار مقدار و درصد ارزش معاملات و سهم بازارهای مختلف از معاملات روز جاری نشان داده شده. 🟣بیشترین درصد برای صندوق‌های درآمد ثابت بوده که ارزش معاملات آن به حدود ۴۵،۸۳۸ میلیارد تومان رسیده و صندوق‌های طلا ارزش معاملات کمتری از صندوق‌های سهامی داشتند. ✅کانال بنیادی کار @bonyadi_kar✅

❤6👎1

11 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC≈3,760 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

راهکار احراز هویت بیومتریک پارت، به‌عنوان تنها سرویس دارنده گواهی افتا، در نمایشگاه FX 2026 حضور خواهد داشت 📣 احراز هویت بیومتریک به‌عنوان یکی از زیرساخت‌های کلیدی امنیت و اعتماد در خدمات دیجیتال، نقش مهمی در توسعه زیست‌بوم مالی هوشمند ایفا می‌کند. 🔹 راهکار احراز هویت بیومتریک شرکت پردازش اطلاعات مالی پارت، به‌عنوان تنها راهکار دارای گواهی افتا در این حوزه، در بیست‌وهشتمین نمایشگاه بین‌المللی بورس، بانک و بیمه (FX …

❤5

Signed پارسا روشن

11 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC≈3,930 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🔻رشد تقاضای معاملات TAL 🔘ارزش تقاضا به حدود ۱.۸ همت رسید و ارزش معاملات نیز به حدود ۳۳۱ میلیارد تومان رسید همچنین عرضه‌ها کمی نسبت به روز گذشته رشد کرده و به ۷۵۲ میلیارد تومان رسید. 🟣بیشترین ارزش تقاضا مربوط به کچاد و جم بود و بیشترین عرضه نیز در نمادهای وبملت و پخش رقم خورده و بیشترین ورود پول هم در شپنا و کالا رخ داده. ✅کانال بنیادی کار @bonyadi_kar✅

❤9👍5

11 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC≈3,940 views27 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🟠 مس در آستانه یک ابرچرخه؟ 🔸در ۱۷۵ سال گذشته، رشد صنعتی و برقی‌ سازی، جنگ‌ ها و اختلالات زنجیره تامین و همچنین بازسازی پس از جنگ، از مهمترین محرکهای قیمت مس بوده‌ اند. عواملی که حالا بار دیگر همزمان در حال تقویت تقاضا هستند. 🔸از یکسو جهان در حال برقی‌ سازی گسترده است و غرب برای کاهش وابستگی به چین، بدنبال تقویت زیرساختهای صنعتی خود است. از سوی دیگر، بازسازی مناطق جنگ‌ زده و اختلالات زنجیره تامین میتواند فشار بیشتری…

❤16👍9👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 304 posts we hold for @bonyadi_kar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@bonyadi_kar edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 36 posts on @bonyadi_kar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
47 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
8

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شرکت سبدگردان زاگرس
@zagrosassetmanagement · 15,091
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
کانال کدال 724
@C0dal724 · 23,286
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
مرکز تحلیل بنیادی
@tahlil_center · 29,791
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
لینک ورود به آرشیو چارت
@archivecharts · 23
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
گروه نوویرا | Novira Group
@noviraco · 28,909
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
بورس پول (یوسفی)
@bourse_poll · 40,625
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
stock & options
@sstock_options · 24,094
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
Enigma Investing
@enigma_investing · 46,077
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
احسان اصفهانی(تابلوبازی)
@tablobaziii · 31,006
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
توپولی
@topoli · 34,621
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده
@fardaname · 25,039
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
فاند پلاس
@fundplus1 · 31,234
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
سهامیاب
@sahamyaab · 29,717
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی"
@m_robatii · 25,974
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
کانال افزایش سرمایه
@afzayeshbors1 · 38,009
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
ره‌آورد | Rahavard
@rahavard365 · 31,362
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
کانال آموزشی پیشرفت مالی
@pishrafte2h · 48,941
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
مجید مؤیدی -شاخص سبز-
@shakhesesabz · 32,276
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
سهم چی بخریم؟
@cheebekharim · 24,469
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 September 2026
طلا از نگاه فاندبیس
@Fundbase_Gold · 37,918
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
Bourse planner
@bourse_planner · 74,961
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
آرش مهراز - صندوق
@InvestmentMind · 24,638
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Capital DNA
@Capital_DNA · 27,340
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
آکادمی خلیفه |بورس و طلا آبشده|
@khalife_bourse_tala · 28,973
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 59 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بنیادی کار” (@bonyadi_kar), 17,513 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bonyadi_kar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.