Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +769. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,569–37,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:57
37,495
+1
15 Sept 2026, 13:59
37,494
+11
13 Sept 2026, 22:01
37,483
-20
12 Sept 2026, 03:21
37,503
-18
9 Sept 2026, 21:19
37,521
+225
6 Sept 2026, 11:01
37,296
-18
4 Sept 2026, 04:38
37,314
+44
2 Sept 2026, 16:59
37,270
+50
1 Sept 2026, 14:06
37,220
+161
31 Aug 2026, 14:46
37,059
+21
30 Aug 2026, 12:29
37,038
+25
29 Aug 2026, 13:06
37,013
+26
28 Aug 2026, 09:57
36,987
-3
27 Aug 2026, 12:18
36,990
-8
26 Aug 2026, 08:56
36,998
+238
25 Aug 2026, 07:22
36,760
+20
24 Aug 2026, 04:46
36,740
+17
22 Aug 2026, 09:57
36,723
-3
20 Aug 2026, 21:32
36,726
+9
19 Aug 2026, 18:05
36,717
first reading
Engagement
347 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.6%
avg views ÷ 37,495 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
234 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
235
of 347 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
347 (4 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
2,768,410
Reactions total
81,612
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 01:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,680
Videos
≈817
Links
≈81
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 58s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
119,099 reactions across 331 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
43,681
36.7%
😁
42,747
35.9%
❤
16,813
14.1%
😢
10,631
8.93%
👎
3,799
3.19%
🔥
923
0.775%
🕊
505
0.424%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 346 of the 347 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122,125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 347 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 346 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hajme_sabzzz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 347 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
گزارشات مالی صندوق تثبیت بازار رسید!
پارسال ، سال ۴۰۴ که همه ! همه و همه ازخشتک تا یقه ضرر کردند
صندوق تثبیت (( با وظیفه امید بخشی به سهامداران خرد برای بقا و امنیت مالی در بازار سهام ))
سود شناسایی کرد !!!
چرا ؟؟!
چون صف فروش رو یه جوری میخرید ، که فردا و پس فرداش هم منفی باشه
چرا ؟؟!!
چون اونجایی که باید ، رو صفر تابلو میخرید ! نمیخرید و ریزش سهم رو تماشا میکرد.
این صندوق ! نیاز به گزارش روزانه داره !
دقیق…
حتی وقتی به یه الاغ هم میگن، خر
ناراحت میشه
مواجه شدن با حقیقت، همیشه سخته
برای همینه که عموما ادمیزاد یا خودش رو به فراموشی میزنه یا نفهمی. و همیشه تاب میخورد مابین خماری و نشئگی !
@hajme_sabzzz
.
به وزیر شکایت کرد از هزینه ارتوپدی و کاردرمانی
وزیر بهداشت هم بهش گفت : خودت بمال ( همه خندیدن )
بعدها شهرداری گفت : خودت بساز
وزیر اقتصاد گفت : خود بچرخون
وزیر کشاورزی گفت : خودت بکار
و کم کم همه گفتند :
خودت بیار ، خودت بجور ، خودت بخر، خودت ، خودت ، خودت.....
امروز که پروازها را تحریم کردند منتظر بودم به مسافر خارجه بگویند : خودت بِپَر
و
همه بخندن و شاد بشن....
@hajme_sabzzz
اگر بنا بر مذاکره باشد
تنها راهش همین محکم حرف زدن پزشکیان و سر و صدای
موشک ها در تنگه هرمز است.
یک لحظه به این فکر کن پزشکیان امروز با ضعف و ناله از دیگران طلب کمک میکرد و صراحتا حرف از مذاکره میزد!
قطعا او و تیمش رو قورت میدادند.
تکلیف اینده باشه واسه اینده پژوهان!
ولی پزشکیان یه راه داشت و همون راه رو دقیق و درست رفت.
وسط دعوا نمیشه بگی، جون مادرت نزن ! بیا آشتی کنیم.
@hajme_sabzzz
یه شبه خراب نشدن!
اولش شاید یه پک سیگار بوده!
یا
یه بوسه ی اشتباه
اخرش شدن فاحشه ی شهر!
شما اون روزی مسیرت خراب شد که بجایی اینکه جواب مخاطبت رو بدی و راهنمایش کنی ، بهش گفتی : چقدر پرتفو داری؟! اگه فلان مقدار میشه بده برات سبدگردانی کنم !
به نفر بعدی و بعدی هم همین و گفتی !
بهت مزه داد.
بعدش رفتی سراغ ، خویش پهلوان پنداری ! رمبوی مجازی شدن و توهم دانایی ، البته به قصد سبد گردانی !
تو انقدر بدرد نخور و دوزاری …
.
شادوماد به عروس گفت : عزیزم، این لامصب بزرگ نیست! اتاق کوچیکه
یه نگاه به قیمت جهانی مس، قیمت دلار و تولید فملی بنداز!
مشکل بازار بزرگی فملی نیست ! حقارت بقیه اعضاء ش اذیتش میکنه !
پس بجای کوبیدن فملی ، فکر ارتقاء سایر سهم ها باشید.
خلاصه که
بد نگوییم به مهتاب
اگر تب داریم
@hajme_sabzzz
ولی خدایی
پر تخم و محکم حرف زد
یه ذره هم اعصاب خراب
و عصبانی
تهش گفت : مذاکره میکنیم ولی تخم جنگیدن هم داریم
و
یا همه امنیت داریم ، یا اگه ما امنیت نداشته باشیم
قطر و مطر و وتر همه باید شب رو درخت بخوابن
@hajme_sabzzz
چین :
ایران میتونه پروازهای تهران انکارا، تهران بغداد، تهران هرکجا رو ،،،،،، همه رو جمع کنه
بیاره پکن !
هوا هم عالیه
در ضمن
اینجا مهر و تسبیح هم داریم واسه سوغات بخرید و ببرید
@hajme_sabzzz
😁365❤47😢15👎8🔥1
Signed سید مهدی طباطبایی
Showing the 12 most recent of 347 posts we hold for @hajme_sabzzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@hajme_sabzzz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
|قدرِ مطلق| (اقتصاد کلان) @ghadremotlagh · 81,490 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
احسان اصفهانی(تابلوبازی) @tablobaziii · 33,949 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
توفان سیگنال بورسی @tofan_signal · 380,740 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
پیکنیک تحلیل @PiknikAnalyst · 113,947 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
POSITIVE WAVE @waveplus · 28,609 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
W.S.F.(چرچیل) @Churchill3 · 45,447 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
گنگ خواب دیده @mortezaebad · 50,700 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی" @m_robatii · 22,275 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
سینا رهبرشهلان @sinarahbarshahlan · 25,861 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
مجید مؤیدی -شاخص سبز- @shakhesesabz · 32,256 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
توپولی @topoli · 29,983 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
سالار صفائی @salarsafaie · 46,017 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Behnam Samadi | بهنام صمدی @BehnamSamadi_ir · 59,801 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
سیگنال رایگان (آفاق) @SignalRaygan_Afagh · 30,460 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
پرویز خالقی @permanet5160 · 63,679 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
توییتر_بورس @twitter_bourse · 69,684 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
stock & options @sstock_options · 22,441 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
فاند پلاس @fundplus1 · 28,028 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
اخبار جنگ /قیمت آنلاین 🔖 @gh_oj · 30,909 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 6 September 2026
« بورس و اقتصاد » @hamian_bourse · 32,150 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
پارسیس تحلیل @parsistahlil · 50,306 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
آرشیو چارت @archivecharts · 24,073 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
کانال حاج میت @tajikmira · 33,129 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
دانشگاه بورس @BourseUniversity · 50,771 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 137 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سید مهدی طباطبایی / حجم سبز” (@hajme_sabzzz), 37,495 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hajme_sabzzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.