Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Elliott Waves
@ElliottWavess
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,151subscribers
+84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001085059691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ElliottWavess |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ElliottWavess |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 9,151 | +31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 9,120 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 9,111 | +12 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 9,099 | +25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 9,074 | +11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 9,063 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 9,061 | +11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 9,050 | +21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 9,029 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 9,039 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 9,055 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 9,076 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 9,080 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 9,066 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 9,067 | first reading |
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 100 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 02s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
قبلا ی تحلیل از کاهشی بودن #طلا 22 میلیونی و و #دلار 200 هزار تومانی داده بودم هر دو در مرز #فیلد شدن هست اگر حاکمیت و نظام اقتصادی کشور براشون اقتصاد مهم باشه این قیمت های #طلا و #دلار جای شوخی نیست اگه از این محدوده قیمت ها عبور کنه حداقل یک ۵۰٪ رشد شارپ خواهد داشت و اگر هم عقلانیت حاکم باشه که میتونه مدیریت کنه قیمتها کاهشی بشه هرچند اگر خبری از توافق و توقف قطعی جنگ نشه در یک بازه چند ماهه متأسفانه سناریوی اول م…
تتر برگشت زیر 200k
🔽 رنج منفی 4 درصدی در صندوقهای #طلا
استیتمنت اکانت 10K متصل به سیگنال های کانال #سیگنال_فارکس تکتک پوزیشن ها زده شده یا استاپ یا صبر تا TP نهایی نتیجه برآیند کل شده 10K به 26.800$ بازدهی کل 168% بعد از 58 موقعیت معاملاتی
Photo, posted without a caption
#وتجارت
#پترول
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @ElliottWavess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
با توجه به ورود شاخص کل به کانال 6 میلیونی اگر از سال ۹۹ همچنان در بورس تهران فعال هستید نسبت به سرمایه گذاری آن سال با توجه به اینکه شاخص کل ۳ برابر شده فارغ از تورم این چند سال چه وضعیتی دارید؟
- همچنان در ضرر هستم43%
- در سود و بازدهی بالای 100% نسبت به آن سال هستم15%
- در سود و بازدهی کمتر از 100% هستم26%
- سر به سر هستم19%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
برای تبدیل شدن به یک تریدر حرفه ای کلا ۶ مرحله باید طی شود الان کدام مرحله از تریدر شدن هستید؟
- سردرگمی و انگیزه18%
- هیجان کاذب11%
- روبرو شدن با واقعیت ترید23%
- یادگیری واقعی19%
- رسیدن به نظم ذهنی31%
- ساخته شدن لایف استایل ترید13%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@waveplus · 28,609
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 9 September 2026
@MohsenHasanlu · 26,837
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
@shakhesesabz · 32,261
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@cheebekharim · 20,550
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 September 2026
@mahdy_mirzaiie · 27,384
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
@BoursEsf13 · 23,643
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
@famatake · 20,585
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@ghadremotlagh · 80,579
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
@sahamyaab · 29,392
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@Mosbat_sabz · 34,251
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
@sstock_options · 22,441
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
@Naghash69_Rtb · 20,902
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
@farshidpakzat_nlp · 21,948
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 September 2026
@Churchill3 · 45,420
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
@boursivared · 2,036
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
@archivecharts · 24,073
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
@hamian_bourse · 32,174
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
@rzgtrader · 72,410
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
@smartbourse_com · 58,689
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@Nima_danaii · 19,826
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
@hezartahlillll · 23,034
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026
@zhikangraphic · 24,129
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 September 2026
@SignalRaygan_Afagh · 30,403
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@DrEghtesad · 231,138
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elliott Waves” (@ElliottWavess), 9,151 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ElliottWavess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.