آدرس سایت app.etfbaz.com
ربات @etfbaz_bot
یادداشتی بر صندوق ها
همه باهم برای فرهنگ سازی سرمایه گذاری اصولی به صورت غیر مستقیم از طریق صندوق های سرمایه گذاری
پاتوق صندوق باز ها🫡
عضویت رایگان کانال ویژه(نوسان گیری صندوق های اهرمی یا طلا)
ادمین @etfbazz
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 128 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 93 days, net +3,754. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,765–15,832 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 13:15
15,106
-8
7 Nov 2026, 10:37
15,114
-11
6 Nov 2026, 11:00
15,125
-17
5 Nov 2026, 13:01
15,142
-15
4 Nov 2026, 11:47
15,157
-10
3 Nov 2026, 12:55
15,167
-8
2 Nov 2026, 10:08
15,175
-3
1 Nov 2026, 12:47
15,178
-10
31 Oct 2026, 15:28
15,188
-3
30 Oct 2026, 18:07
15,191
-10
29 Oct 2026, 20:29
15,201
+1
28 Oct 2026, 17:57
15,200
+5
27 Oct 2026, 20:10
15,195
-12
26 Oct 2026, 20:38
15,207
-13
26 Oct 2026, 00:08
15,220
-2
24 Oct 2026, 22:54
15,222
-11
24 Oct 2026, 00:59
15,233
-7
23 Oct 2026, 00:18
15,240
-7
21 Oct 2026, 21:00
15,247
+9
20 Oct 2026, 19:21
15,238
first reading
Engagement
134 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 15,106 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,060
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 134 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
134 (1 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
212,550
Reactions total
3,515
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
397
Videos
64
Links
307
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 08s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,705 reactions across 134 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8,505
62.1%
👍
3,182
23.2%
🙏
784
5.72%
👌
443
3.23%
👏
437
3.19%
🔥
354
2.58%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
536
across the posts below
Posts paid on
80
of 134 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @etfbaz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 134 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (26.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
گرام از زمان اعلام سیگنال، در یک هفته حدود ۶ درصد بازده دلاری داشته است.
اگر فقط اهرم ۱۰ گرفته باشید ۶۰ درصد سود هستید.
از اینجا به بعد، برای این معامله راهنمایی دیگری نمیدهم و میتوانید کامل خارج شوید. سود کردید، نوش جان! به این میگویند سود دلاری.
سیگنال را از همان اول در کانال عمومی، جلوی چشم چند هزار نفر اعلام کردیم؛ بعد از رشد قیمت نیامدیم فقط اسکرینشات سود بگذاریم مثل بقیه کانال ها.
اگر دوست داشتید، ب…
بازار کریپتو خونی است و تقریباً همه ارزها منفی سنگین هستند؛ بهجز گرام (gram)که صندوقباز چند روز قبل سیگنال کرد و در بازار خونی امروز مثبت 6 درصد است.
فعلاً نفروشید و نگهداری کنید. هر زمان زمان فروش باشد، اعلام میکنم.
🌐 @etfbaz
☑️به نظرم این آخرین موج صعودی پیش از یک اصلاح جدی است. بعد از پایان موج، احتمال افت ۲۰ تا ۳۰ درصدی سهام و افت تا ۵۰ درصدی صندوقهای اهرمی وجود دارد. بعد از آن هم ممکن است بازار یک موج صعودی قوی دیگر داشته باشد ولی اصلاح ان نسبتا جدی خواهد بود.
این فقط یک سناریوست و نمیدانم سقف موج کجاست. برای اینکه نشانههای پایان موج را بهموقع ببینید، رد پول، اندیکاتورها و ترکیب دارایی شاخصمحور سایت صندوقباز را زیر نظر بگیرید…
☑️برخلاف کسانی که تحرکات دیپلماتیک اخیر را مثبت و نشانه نزدیکشدن به توافق میدانند، برداشت من درست برعکس است.
به نظرم، تغییر پیدرپی میانجیها نشانه یک گره کور در مذاکرات است. کشورهای همسایه نگران تشدید تنشاند و هر بار که تلاش یک میانجی به بنبست میخورد، کشور دیگری وارد میشود تا گره را باز کند.
بعید میدانم این وضعیت زیاد دوام بیاورد. بالاخره یا یکی از دو طرف کوتاه میآید، یا خطر وقوع دوباره یک جنگ تمامعیار…
☑️امروز هر دو شرطی که در پیام ریپلایشده گفته بودم، محقق شد: صندوقهای اهرمی، بهویژه «اهرم»، از سقف دیروز عبور کردند و خروج سنگین پول داغ و گروهی هم در «برآیند» ابزار رد پول متوقف شد.
حالا بازار تا کجا بالا میرود؟ خدا میداند. پس این کانالهای تلگرامی که همهچیز را از قبل میدانند، چه؟ بعضیها از همین قطعیتفروشی(توهم) پول درمیآورند. حقیقت یعنی «نمیدانم» مشتری کمتری دارد؛ با آن سختتر میشود جیب کسی را تیغ زد.…
☑️بهزودی هوش مصنوعی به تیم پشتیبانی مجموعه صندوقباز اضافه میشود تا پیامهایتان سریعتر پاسخ داده شوند و حجم بالا پیام بهتر مدیریت کنیم.
امروز از پیامهای پشتیبانی کانال خروجی گرفتیم تا سامانه را بر اساس سؤالهای واقعی شما آماده کنیم؛ از کار با سایت و پیگیری امور کارگزاریها و صرافیهای همکار گرفته تا سؤال درباره طرحهای درآمدی آینده. هرجا هم نیاز به پیگیری بیشتر باشد، تیم پشتیبانی انسانی وارد عمل میشود.
خود ر…
☑️اگر پولی را که در این ۴۰ سال خرج پرواز، رفتوآمد و تشریفات مذاکرات شده، طلا خریده و انبار کرده بودند، لابد الان بزرگترین ذخایر طلای جهان را داشتیم. اعصاب مردم هم سالمتر بود؛ از بس روزی ده بار نشنیده بودند: مذاکره، جنگ، تهدید... دوباره مذاکره، جنگ، تهدید!
حالا هزینههای رفتوآمد و تشریفات به کنار؛ فشاری را که این خبرهای تکراری به روح و روان مردم آورده، چطور حساب میکنید؟
بابا، یک سال در خانه بمانید و مذاکره ن…
☑️اگر فردا صندوقهای اهرمی، بهویژه «اهرم»، از سقف قیمتی امروز خود عبور کنند، میتواند نشانه بازگشت بازار به روند صعودی باشد. و شاهد یک موج صعودی و روند صعودی جدید در بازار خواهیم بود.
البته برای تأیید این سناریو، بخش «برآیند» ابزار رد پول سایت صندوقباز هم باید نشان دهد که خروج سنگین پول داغ و گروهی متوقف شده است.
🌐 @etfbaz
☑️ابلاغیه امکان معامله با کد PRX(سبدگردانی) در بورس کالا صادر شده است.
به نظرم تصمیم خیلی خوبی است، بهخصوص برای استراتژی افزایش وزن طلا. با دسترسی به بورس کالا، هدف افزایش سالانه ۲۰ درصدی وزن طلا ساده تر می شود. پیش از این از روش دیگری استفاده میکردیم که اجرای آن سختتر بود و تا حد زیادی میزان افزایش وزن طلا به رونق و رکود بازار طلا بستگی داشت.
البته با وجود صدور ابلاغیه، زیرساخت لازم هنوز آماده نیست و این امک…
☑️افزایش نرخ سود بین بانکی بر همه بازارها اثر منفی میگذارد. اثر آن بر بورس بیشتر و بر طلا و دلار کمتر خواهد بود.
کسبوکارها هم تحت فشار قرار میگیرند، بهویژه اگر نرخ تسهیلات بالا برود و تأمین مالی گرانتر شود.
احتمال زیاد دارد نرخ سود اعتبار کارگزاریها بهزودی به ۳۶ درصد برسد و فاصله تا سود صندوق درامد ثابت کمتر شود.
فعلاً نرخ سود بینبانکی بالا رفته است. این افزایش لزوماً به معنی افزایش نرخ سود سپردهها ن…
⭕️ هدیههای باشگاه مشتریان بلاخره امروز با تأخیر از دیجیکالا به دفتر رسیدند. امروز حتماً پست میکنیم و انتظار داریم تا ۳ روز آینده به دستتان برسند.
بابت این تأخیر از همهتان عذرخواهی میکنم تلاش میکنم دیگه تکرار نشود.
اگر دوست دارید شما هم از صندوقباز حمایت کنید(بابت سایت رایگان) و از هدیهها و خدمات رایگان باشگاه مشتریان بهرهمند شوید، راهنمای عضویت را در لینک زیر بخوانید:
🌐 https://etfbaz.com/club/
🌐 @etfb
#آموزش
آموزش
💬سختترین کار دنیا؟ ترید.
وقتی معامله میکنیم، در مغزمان چه میگذرد؟
چه توی بازار ایران معامله میکنی، چه توی بازار جهانی، گوشدادن به این پادکست از نان شب واجبتره.
🟢به نظرم این پادکست میلیون دلاری هست.
⭕️⭕️از دستش نده‼️
🌐 @etfbaz
👍37❤24👌4
Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @etfbaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@etfbaz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @etfbaz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
2 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
جواد نصر | سلام بورس @salam_bourse · 36,359 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
طلا از نگاه فاندبیس @Fundbase_Gold · 37,970 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا @etfplus · 29,706 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
محسن تحلیل | Mohsen Tahlil @mohsen_tahlil · 39,058 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال حاج میت @tajikmira · 33,905 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
بورس و ارز با رابینز (VIP) @robbinstreders · 43,344 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
قیمت لحظهای طلا دلار سکه @nerkhzani · 51,576 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
لینک ورود به آرشیو چارت @archivecharts · 23 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
✔️ ️حرکات اصلاحی وتوانبخشی @Tavana2015 · 34,655 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 3 September 2026
صندوقها از نگاه فاندبیس @Fundbase_ir · 76,412 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
کانال کدال 724 @C0dal724 · 23,280 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
گروه مالی فارابی @farabinvest · 52,235 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
ترید فاند @trade_fundd · 25,101 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
سهم چی بخریم؟ @cheebekharim · 24,737 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 September 2026
احسان اصفهانی(تابلوبازی) @tablobaziii · 31,117 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
روانشناسی بورس(بازارهای مالی ) @ravanbors · 41,476 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
معجزه نوسانگیری @bourse14200 · 22,342 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
️️مثبت سبز @Mosbat_sabz · 36,003 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
گروه نوویرا | Novira Group @noviraco · 29,279 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
EcoKhavand | اکوخاوند @eco_khavand · 119,854 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
عرضه اولیه @arzeavalie_official · 49,084 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
سهام مستعد رشد @MOSTAEED110 · 28,955 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
گروه مالی فیروزه | Firouzeh @firouzeh · 52,928 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
بورس اصفهان | Bourse Esf @BoursEsf13 · 22,623 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“etfbaz/صندوق باز” (@etfbaz), 15,106 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etfbaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.