به خاطر ضرر دوستان vip تا صبح باز میشود👆👆✅

Channel
💲آکادمی Mr.GOLD 💲
@mrgold995
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,194subscribers
+190 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001182333897 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mrgold995 |
| Description | کلیه تحلیل های کانال صرفا نظر شخصی میباشد برای درج کلیه اخبار کانال از منابع معتبر و رسمی استفاده میشه ارتباط با ما برای دریافت اشتراک کانال خصوصی بازار داخلی / کریپتو /فارکس👇👇 @faramarzzadeh1 ادمین تبلیغات 👇👇 @Ads_ex |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mrgold995 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 29,194 | -4 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 29,198 | -18 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 29,216 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 29,221 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 29,224 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 29,217 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:20 | 29,218 | -7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 29,225 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 29,236 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:33 | 29,239 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:13 | 29,234 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 29,220 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 29,227 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 29,226 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 29,231 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 29,237 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 29,239 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 29,230 | +258 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 28,972 | +26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 28,946 | first reading |
Engagement
1,135 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.8%
- avg views ÷ 29,194 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,650
- 408 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.26%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 408
- of 1,135 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 317 of 408 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,135 (6 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,714,601 |
| Reactions total | 44,707 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 22:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈21,700
- Videos
- ≈4,850
- Links
- ≈1,130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 11m
- Average length
- 1m 15s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
118,382 reactions across 889 posts, in 68 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 34,731 | 29.3% | |
| 😁 | 14,548 | 12.3% | |
| 🤣 | 11,119 | 9.39% | |
| ❤ | 11,013 | 9.30% | |
| 🤬 | 9,003 | 7.61% | |
| 💩 | 7,495 | 6.33% | |
| 👏 | 6,890 | 5.82% | |
| 👎 | 5,154 | 4.35% | |
| 🍌 | 3,962 | 3.35% | |
| 😢 | 2,397 | 2.02% | |
| 🔥 | 2,337 | 1.97% | |
| 😭 | 2,083 | 1.76% | |
| 😡 | 830 | 0.701% | |
| 💔 | 685 | 0.579% | |
| 👌 | 633 | 0.535% | |
| 🥴 | 633 | 0.535% | |
| 🥰 | 497 | 0.42% | |
| 🤯 | 487 | 0.411% | |
| 🤡 | 473 | 0.4% | |
| 🤔 | 443 | 0.374% | |
| 48 further kinds | 2,969 | 2.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 889 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118,382 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
بیا باخودم بخر بفروش ❤️ هزینه وی ای پی هم نده تا یک ماه رایگان☝️☝️☝️ ظرفیت فقط 50 نفراول
🔻تو این شرایط بازار دلیلی نمیبینم که از اعضا برای ورود به VIP پول بگیرم 🙏دعای خیرتون برای ما کافی است لینک ورود : 👇
عاجل به نقل از اسکات بسنت؛وزیر خزانه داری امریکا گفت: هر کشوری که با جمهوری اسلامی همکاری کند در معرض شدیدترین تحریم ها قرار خواهد گرفت.
کی فکرشو می کرد یه روزی تتلو و رسایی تو یه زندان بخوابن...
خبرنگار آکسیوس : 🔹یک مقام آمریکایی به من گفت: «رئیس جمهور ترامپ مایل است در ازای پیشرفت ملموس در پرونده هستهای، تحریمهای ایران را لغو و داراییهای مسدود شده این کشور را آزاد کند.»
یک مقام آمریکایی به شبکه CNN گفت: 🔹 ما در حال انجام مذاکرات مثبت و سازنده با ایران از طریق واسطهها هستیم. ایران در مورد مسائل هستهای، رویکردی انعطافپذیر دارد.
العربیه: 🔹مذاکرات غیر مستقیم ویتکاف عراقچی مثبت بوده است
#فوری گزارشهایی از موج جدید شلیک موشکها از خاک ایران
انگاری میلی گلد به پایان سلام کرده طبق گفته مخاطبان از ساعتی پیش سرمایه دارای میلی گلد ریختن تو شرکت میلی گلد و مسولین شرکتو دارن کتک میزنن و هر چی میبینن خرد میکنن و فقط صدای عربده و ناله از توی میلی گلد شنیده میشه
برقراری مجدد پروازهای تهران به نجف تکذیب شد 🔹ابوذر شیرودی ضمن اشاره به اخبار منتشر شده در برخی رسانهها مبنی بر برقراری مجدد پرواز شرکتهای هواپیمایی ایرانی به نجف از روز چهارشنبه (هشتم مهرماه)، این اخبار را فاقد اعتبار برشمرد و قابل تأیید ندانست./ ایرنا
سخنگوی وزارت امور خارجه ایران: بازگشت وزیر امور خارجه به تهران طبق برنامه قبلی انجام خواهد شد.
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,135 posts we hold for @mrgold995. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@goldonline2016 · 65,741#1
@pposhte_pardee · 14,138#2
@snaptal1399pik · 8,771#3
@tahlilbazar · 26,690#4
@khabar_fouri · 1,176,107#5
@mazene · 56,684#6
@tgtala1 · 17,628#7
@Mohammadjavadhosseinii · 23,466#8
@KEBRIAGOLD · 6,647#9
@IR_Breakingnews · 31,902#10
@PiknikAnalyst · 113,947#11
@demobaborsiha · 12,652#12
@akhbare_fouri · 1,133,777#13
@twiier_news · 51,303#14
@arash_timess · 425,333#15
@caronline · 417,431#16
@king_powr · 48,848#17
@eco_ehsan · 1,006,627#18
@akhbarefori · 4,276,028#19
@Mr_Economy · 113,305#20
@iranintltv · 1,364,042#21
@entekhab_ir · 205,558#22
@GOLD_NEWS1 · 13,077#23
@ccoineres · 20,754#24
@Mazaneeposhtkhati · 35,843#25
@bbcpersian · 771,942#26
@persiannbloomberg · 108,802#27
@news2 · 13,836#28
@signal_bartar20 · 13,436#29
@Cryptofa_official · 44,977#30
@Thalildolar2015 · 12,471#31
@Jahan_Fouri · 80,333#32
@fhhjkngfdsajkkg · 23,761#33
@betasahm1 · 125,474#34
@boltann · 116,982#35
@Cryptoo_neews · 21,342#36
@DailyGoldAnalysis2000 · 5,346#37
@eghtesad124 · 4,427#38
@Khabare_vije · 1,170,509#39
@tsepress · 65,269#40
@tajikmira · 33,129#41
@wallstrong_arst · 3,419#42
@HaratMarket · 15,329#43
@crypto0commander · 31,133#44
@tahlelteknekal · 3,283#45
@airdroptell2024 · 6,918#46
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 83,127#47
@iranjib_ir · 135,051#48
@nobitexmarket · 318,670#49
@hratyifkb · 13,506#50
@jaguar_sig · 17,699#51
@GOLDVSBTC1 · 43,968#52
@farhad1356 · 78,023#53
@BehnamSamadi_ir · 60,026#54
@crypto_shekar · 14,408#55
@ForexTR · 12,328#56
@airdrop2423 · 324 (as read 8 September 2026)#57
@hajme_sabzzz · 37,566#58
@cryptocoiner_news · 11,691#59
@HsHsN · 3,283#60
@soltan_navasan · 39,346#61
@NabTwitt24 · 9,925#62
@dolarr2020 · 25,033#63
@twitter_bourse · 70,151#64
@Aalijnab · 357,302#65
@perfect_analysis · 2,593#66
@permanet5160 · 63,679#67
@ShaheenAsmaye · 26,220#68
@ontimeounce · 53,226#69
@abshdanaghdy · 171,305#70
@SabzeMaidan · 63,341#71
@dolar402rate · 17,915#72
@sekesabze · 8,583#73
@NaghdP · 68,914#74
@cryptobyalireza · 37,126#75
@TetherLand · 72,143#76
@marajeharat · 7,087#77
@Teamxry · 2,257#78
@wallstreet202 · 13,466#79
@harat500 · 16,253#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Mohammadjavadhosseinii · 23,466
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
@tahlilbazar · 26,690
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 September 2026
@king_powr · 48,848
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@IR_Breakingnews · 31,902
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
@Mazaneeposhtkhati · 35,843
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026
@mazene · 56,684
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@goldonline2016 · 65,741
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 August 2026
@SabzeMaidan · 63,341
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 26 August 2026
@fasleeghtesad · 56,116
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@AbshodeNaghdi · 25,542
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 14 September 2026
@dollarferdowsii · 22,820
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 19 September 2026
@fhhjkngfdsajkkg · 23,761
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 September 2026
@OUNSGOLD · 25,891
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 September 2026
@twiier_news · 51,303
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
@khabar_ani · 36,384
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 31 August 2026
@das_cash · 38,593
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 31 August 2026
@dollar_khabari · 73,257
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
@PishbiniTalaa · 125,214
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 13 August 2026
@Esfahan20 · 20,487
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 September 2026
@talair · 31,917
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 5 September 2026
@DollarAfshar · 25,128
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 September 2026
@NerkhDollarIRT · 87,763
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
@Mr_Economy · 113,305
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 August 2026
@soltan_navasan · 39,346
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 44 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💲آکادمی Mr.GOLD 💲” (@mrgold995), 29,194 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrgold995.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.