Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 687 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2021 to 10 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @GameFi_OfficialANN — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -37,029. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,469,645–2,517,782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 06:33
2,475,199
-7,341
11 Aug 2026, 03:28
2,482,540
-6,800
10 Aug 2026, 01:41
2,489,340
-5,859
9 Aug 2026, 02:35
2,495,199
-5,599
8 Aug 2026, 02:17
2,500,798
-4,992
7 Aug 2026, 03:30
2,505,790
-5,767
6 Aug 2026, 05:20
2,511,557
-671
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
2,512,228
first reading
Engagement
739 posts held, back to 15 July 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4,047 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 739 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
539
Videos
112
Links
630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
42s
Average length
21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,976 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,637
15.5%
🔥
2,424
14.3%
👍
2,414
14.2%
🤩
2,378
14.0%
👏
2,333
13.7%
🎉
2,316
13.6%
🥰
2,299
13.5%
❤🔥
60
0.353%
💯
42
0.247%
😁
26
0.153%
🤣
10
0.059%
🙏
6
0.035%
🤔
4
0.024%
🍾
3
0.018%
🐳
3
0.018%
😱
3
0.018%
🤝
3
0.018%
🥴
3
0.018%
🌭
2
0.012%
😢
2
0.012%
7 further kinds
8
0.047%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 717 of the 739 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 390,564reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 739 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2021 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Market's choppy, but the alpha never stops 🎮 Here are three trending titles the community is aping into this week:
Sol Siege — Idle wave defender ($SIEGE) — Solana
Pirates of the Arrland — Pirate-themed MMO MOBA — Web3
Pumpville World — Social multiplayer pixel world — Web3
Which of these are you grinding today?
Crypto market sentiment remains extremely bearish.
• Bitcoin is down 32% YTD and dropped another 11% in just 2 days.
• Ethereum is down 45% YTD.
• Strategy is sitting on an unrealized $11.5B loss on its Bitcoin holdings.
• Bitmine's ETH position is reportedly down $8.7B.
• Peter Schiff predicts Bitcoin could fall below $20,000.
Historically, the best opportunities appear when fear is at its peak and everyone expect…
🔊 HOT TAKE:
Iran conflict & AI hunger could push BTC to $126,000?
BitMex's founder Arthur Hayes predicts: War & AI force will govs to print money 🔜 Create a nice inflationary environment for BTC.
When it starts? $90,000 might be the flashpoint for mass buying & an accelerated rally, NFA btw.
He also shifted fund into high-risk ones, like HYPE - ZEC - NEAR.
Do you trust what he's advising? 🌚
🎓 Elon Musk: "MOST CRYPTO IS A SCAM"
The Dogefather just shocked community by testifying in court that most crypto assets are nothing but a fraud.
This massive flip-flop comes, despite Tesla holding billions in $BTC and Musk personally pumping $DOGE for years.
OpenAI even claims Musk originally supported their plans for a crypto ICO back in 2018.
Anyways, in this market, watch the charts not the talk! 🌚
An ETH Whale Moves 10,000 ETH After 10 Silent Years ♦️
This whale joined the 2015 Ethereum ICO.
Originally got 10,000 ETH at an entry price of $0.311/coin.
After 10 years silent, they transferred the entire 10,000 ETH to a new address (0xCD59) on April 29, 2026.
They HOLD from $3,110 value to $22.88 million!
What an absolute W.
🚨 Kelp DAO Got Hacked for $293M, Aave and DeFi Lending Market ROCKED 🚨
Early April 19, a major exploit hit Kelp DAO. Hackers successfully tricked the platform's bridge, leading to the unauthorized release of 116,500 rsETH. This staggering amount, equivalent to approximately $293 million, was drained in under one minute.
The shockwaves of this attack immediately spread beyond Kelp DAO. Aave, the largest lending plat…
🇮🇷 Iran demands CRYPTO payments from ships passing the Strait of Hormuz during ceasefire 🔥.
Tehran is now requiring digital currency tolls for safe passage, turning one of the world’s most critical chokepoints into a crypto toll booth. 🚢💰
Will $BTC reach $100K this month?
The Iran vs US & Israel war consequence:
Crypto is joining as payment for Hormuz ❓
After Trump publicly threatened to destroy Iran's power plants & infrastructure, Iran threatened to completely destroy OpenAI's Stargate data center in Abu Dhabi.
Iran is also going to charge the Hormuz-passing fee in CRYPTO - about 2 millions USD per ship.
Is this the crypto adoption Trump was talking about, lmao???
Circle ($CRCL), the issuer of USDC stablecoin, saw its stock crash 20%, after reports of a leaked Clarity Act draft that proposes strict limits or outright bans on yields/rewards for holding USDC.
This week, the crypto market stayed choppy and range-bound amid escalating geopolitical risks and macro uncertainty, with thin liquidity adding to the sideways grind.
Here's what went down in crypto over the past 7 days:
▶️ Summary:
▪️ BTC dipped toward mid-$60K before recovering; now consolidating tightly around $67K–$68K while ETH stuck in low $2K range
▪️ Resolv Labs' USR stablecoin hit hard from the exploit (~8…
🚨 Breaking: Over $600 billion poured into the US stock market
❤33👍22🔥18🎉16🤩14🥰13👏12💅1
Showing the 12 most recent of 739 posts we hold for @GameFi_OfficialANN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 146,720 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
10
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@GameFi_OfficialANN named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tomoonepets named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@kaiachain named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@chaincolosseum_ named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@gamefi_korea named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@metapals named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@rwadepin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@vannyverse named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@wolfonairechatbox named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@cryptolegendarychat named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@drzombiepump named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Domains linked from posts
53 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GameFi.org Announcement Channel” (@GameFi_OfficialANN), 2,475,199 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GameFi_OfficialANN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.