Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Seedify.fund Announcements

@seedifyfund

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

84,985subscribers

-505 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001217194747
TypeChannel
Username@seedifyfund
Description🧑‍🌾 Telegram Group: https://t.me/seedifyfundofficial 🐧 Twitter: https://twitter.com/SeedifyFund 🌝 CMC: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/seedify-fund/ 🥞 Pancakeswap link to trade SFUND: https://exchange.pancakeswap.finance/#/swap?outputCurrency
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/seedifyfund

Growth

84,98585,49085,237.56 August 2026 — 85,490 subscribers6 August 2026 — 85,490 subscribers7 August 2026 — 85,412 subscribers7 August 2026 — 85,349 subscribers8 August 2026 — 85,286 subscribers9 August 2026 — 85,222 subscribers10 August 2026 — 85,165 subscribers11 August 2026 — 85,086 subscribers12 August 2026 — 84,985 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -505. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84,909–85,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:0384,985-101
11 Aug 2026, 15:1585,086-79
10 Aug 2026, 14:1285,165-57
9 Aug 2026, 17:0385,222-64
8 Aug 2026, 19:5885,286-63
7 Aug 2026, 21:1085,349-63
7 Aug 2026, 00:0085,412-78
6 Aug 2026, 01:3485,490no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:2085,490first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.02%
avg views ÷ 84,985 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held31 (17 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total49,896
Reactions total1,057
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
403
Videos
174
Links
5,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 17s
Average length
7m 17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

893 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
64372.0%
🔥20823.3%
👏353.92%
🤯40.448%
😱20.224%
🤩10.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,057reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC676 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026

In terms of the systems, we got more to do. Today we had some more issues with trading getting deactivated during certain merges. In terms of performance there is room to improve upon. Charts and certain parts of data integrations need polishing as well. Will be shipping some more new fixes & improvements tonight, hopefully we can have a smoother, 99.9% uptime experience soon.

🔥227

11 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC758 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Hi everybody, For being competitive at bringing builders and creators onboard, we will be doing a slight adjustment to the fees structure on mainnet. It will be 1.25% trading fees instead of 1%, going as 75/25 between projects and us, and 50% of each side auto buyback and burns still. This will help us to have much more launches compared to the initial structure, and create more value for more projects' success jo

30🔥5

10 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC896 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026

let's stack Ws in the testnet while preparing for the mainnet https://x.com/meta_alchemist/status/2086949064177037782?s=46

22🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC976 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Good weeks everybody, We released an update this morning for all the improvements done over the weekend. Will see how everything is working in this merge a bit more, and then will start to announce the campaign for testnet to more people. Thank you

29

8 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,420 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Hello everybody, Let me share some updates: - Yesterday we brought in certain systems to have uptime issues fixed, and code merges to hopefully not put website on maintenance. Still gotta see if its working great with the new approaches. - Keeper contracts, which are used for buying and burning tokens auto, have been set at start quite low compared to what we needed. That makes them lag behind, when we deploy the ne

26👏5

7 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC≈1,320 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Regarding getting more projects onboarded, we've been building a lead generation system using Spark agents and LLMs. We will make that a public dashboard so that instead of just agents or me reaching out to builders, founders, and teams, if we can do the contacts part as a community effort, we will likely have a lot more leads and projects, to increase the activity in the launchpad. Those who then help us bring and

34

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,300 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Good morning everybody, Today we will be continuing to improve the platform more. Seems last night trading got inactive all of a sudden due to one of the RPCs falling behind, just fixed that. Trading is back live. After some more merges we will start to activate the campaigns to onboard more people to the testnet. Thank you!

29👏3

6 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈1,360 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026

For bug reports, feedback and suggestions please use this form guys. Feedbacks will help us fix issues faster and get ready for the mainnet. Much appreciated! https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSedKc8Omc4rFDVHiPN76Cmz4dqx_uFD_b9cKQfVqcmpsEZlXA/viewform

24

6 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,200 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The above issues should be better right now. It will take some time for tSFUND buybacks and burns to catch up but buyback and burn is working now. You can see from flywheel section. Works for project tokens as well. Let's continue to improve more stuff.

24👏3

6 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,200 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The site has started to have some slowness issues that appeared this morning. Also the tSFUND flywheel is not properly configured yet. Going through more issue fixes besides, later on will publish a way to share your reports, bugs, and feedback. 🙏

32

6 Aug 2026, 00:41 UTC≈1,280 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026

A few things to keep in mind: - Getting testnet ETH for Robinhood is completely free - Burner wallets are always recommended, no need to plug a serious wallet to testnet - When you create a token on testnet, it's not real, so have fun - Start grinding PNL within testnet with ETH testnet tokens you got from Robinhood faucets. - Best creators and traders will be winning the season rewards. In phase 0, which is current

23🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @seedifyfund. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 31,359 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Aethir Announcements
@Aethir_Official · 138,202
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
ChainGPT Official Announcements Channel
@ChainGPTNews · 410,660
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Seedify.fund Announcements” (@seedifyfund), 84,985 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seedifyfund.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.