![Telegram profile photo for [ANN] www.yay.network](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/8f/8fe750e913c07fafff54695e04745f831accce96331ed5817d9e471797033902.jpg)
Channel
@yaynetwork_ann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,845subscribers
-348 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001306731121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yaynetwork_ann |
| Description | Official channel for news and updates about YAY Network |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yaynetwork_ann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 42,845 | -47 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 42,892 | -37 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 42,929 | -44 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 42,973 | -56 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 43,029 | -42 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 43,071 | -45 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 43,116 | -59 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 43,175 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 43,193 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 43,193 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
33 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 81.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 15.2% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 15 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎙 Onchain is back: Is it real growth beyond farming volumes? Join us today with: - Bry of Decibel - JD of ONCHAIN® Labs - Michael Cameron of Superp - Cafolla of Neox ⏱ 4PM UTC 📍 https://x.com/i/spaces/1yNxabBWPlRKj 🎁$100 in rewards. 2 winners 🔜Follow the steps here
❤4👍3
It’s good to start the year with numbers up📈 But the Q4 2025 downtrend is something worth reflecting on. What we saw toward the end of last year wasn’t just volatility. It was a signal. ▸Presales not getting filled ▸Tokens losing 60%+ at TGE ▸Liquidity rotating faster than ever This isn’t retail losing interest. It’s retail getting smarter. The market is quietly shifting from "what's trending?" to "why should I …
❤4
▸Invest in the best products ▸Support the best builders ▸Become the leading Web3 investing syndicate 2025 is just a stepping stone Onwards ↗️ 📱 Show some love
❤3💯1
🎙2025 recap: Biggest fails, hard lessons, and real wins. What’s coming in 2026? Join us today with: - Syndika - Decibel - Curious. - Self Protocol - Disence - BAISHI - ONCHAIN® Labs - Yay Network ⏰ 4pm UTC https://x.com/i/spaces/1RDxlAvmrEOKL
👍1
📣 YAY's Liquidity Pair Update 📣 We will be transitioning our liquidity pair on PancakeSwap from USDT to USDC in the near future. This is a planned and controlled update, and no action is required from you. We appreciate your continued support. Cheers and enjoy the rest of the holidays! 🥂 📱 Show some love 📖 YAY Network Official Channels Website | Twitter | Telegram chat | Announcements
❤3👍1
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays from YAY Network 🎄 We are grateful for the builders we've backed this year and our supportive investor community Enjoy the holidays, get some rest, and spend time with loved ones 🫶 📱Show some love 📖 YAY Network Official Channels Website | Twitter | Telegram chat | Announcements
❤4
CT says it's ICO season, but the numbers tell another story Fewer new teams are being backed as monthly funding rounds in crypto sit at an all-time low Builders have spent years optimizing for fundraising, not users; for tokens, not products Until crypto rebuilds around real user demand ICO season will stay a timeline illusion, not a market reality 📖 YAY Network Official Channels Website | Twitter | Telegram cha…
❤1
Are airdrops slowly being replaced by ICOs? Since the beginning, airdrops were crypto’s go-to growth strategy But after endless Sybil farms, mercenary hunters, and instant TGE dumps, the model hit a wall Projects built massive communities that disappeared as soon as they launch Now a new pattern is emerging Public sales that carry the same early-access energy as airdrops, but with real commitment When people co…
❤3
The crypto landscape is shifting fast, so is the way teams market and communicate Special guests on the last Founders Show broke down what’s working, what’s fading, and what’s next. Our latest post contains key highlights from the discussion every founder and marketer should know: ▣ The state of marketing, an extension of the state of the industry ▣ The rise of infoFi and how best to leverage it ▣ Product vs Hyp…
Spring just launched 1st.app — and our community got an Airdrop! 🎉 Built by the Spring team, 1st.app is the first DEX for trading locked tokens post-TGE with deep liquidity. Yay Network users get 1st Points based on their Spring activity: ✅ Investors who invested or traded on Spring before Sept 15, 2025. ✅ Imported deals don't qualify for 1st points. ✅ Refunded deals don't qualify for 1st points. ✅ $1 invested or …
❤3
Deal count in crypto funding rounds hasn’t returned to the January highs of 250+ The era of funding vanity and gameable metrics is fading Capital now flows to products that work, generate real revenue, and have a clear path to product-market fit The investing landscape is changing, and only genuine builders will thrive 📱 Show some love 📖 YAY Network Official Channels Website | Twitter | Telegram chat | Announcem…
What changed in the Web3 investing landscape? At the last Founders Show, c-level executives from the crypto venture space shared some insights into what narratives VCs are looking to fund this quarter and what has changed since the last cycle. Here are some of the key topics of the discussion: - The shift from vanity metrics to sustainable investing - Why you must bet on teams, not just the product - Top narrative…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yaynetwork_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 486,544 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[ANN] www.yay.network” (@yaynetwork_ann), 42,845 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yaynetwork_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.