Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2,252. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181,036–183,964 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:45
181,374
-358
11 Aug 2026, 13:36
181,732
-500
10 Aug 2026, 11:52
182,232
-366
9 Aug 2026, 12:41
182,598
-369
8 Aug 2026, 11:46
182,967
-228
7 Aug 2026, 10:50
183,195
-399
6 Aug 2026, 09:20
183,594
-32
6 Aug 2026, 01:31
183,626
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:00
183,626
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
83
Videos
30
Links
86
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,292 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
396
30.7%
🔥
260
20.1%
👍
194
15.0%
😁
167
12.9%
🎉
162
12.5%
🐳
38
2.94%
👏
24
1.86%
❤🔥
22
1.70%
👌
7
0.542%
🌚
5
0.387%
👀
4
0.31%
😭
4
0.31%
🙏
4
0.31%
😢
3
0.232%
😈
2
0.155%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,292reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2025 to 2 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Did you know VC funding actually ticked up in June? 👀
Crypto startups raised $1.15B across 140 deals, with:
⬆️ +3% more capital
⬆️ +9% more deals
(vs. May’s $1.12B / 129 deals)
Not quite March madness yet, but money’s moving again 💰
Will IDOs start warming up? 👇
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
❤️ SETAI Agents x TrustyFi ❤️
SETAI Agents is teaming up with TrustyFi, the leading blockchain-verified review platform, to reshape how trust and transparency scale in crypto.
➡️ TrustyFi by the Numbers:
✅ 200+ partnerships across the Web3 ecosystem
✅ 5,000+ wallet connections since launch
✅ 3,000+ verified reviews enhancing industry transparency
When AI agents meet blockchain truth-telle…
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
❤️ SETAI Agents x Enterise ❤️
We’re teaming up with Enterise – The pioneering Web3 film distribution platform bringing blockchain to the big screen.
🎬 On-Chain Film Ownership – Tokenized rights for transparent revenue & fair creator payouts.
🌐 Decentralized Distribution – Release directly to global audiences, no middlemen.
🪙$ENT Utility – Watch, vote, stake, and collect unique digital film a…
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
❤️ SETAI Agents x ZENi ❤️
We’re teaming up with @aZenAIAgent, the AI agent powering the @azen_protocol ecosystem - built to grow Web3 projects through intelligent, emotionally-aware automation.
Why ZENi?
🟣 Social AI Agent – Boost engagement with viral, AI-generated content.
🟣 DeFi AI Agent – Simplify staking & yield with smart automation.
🟣 Proven Traction – 650K+ users, 75K+ daily active. T…
Stablecoins just hit a new ATH: $250B market cap! That’s a +55% surge in just one year 📈
Big bags are chillin’ in stablecoin, waitin' for that perfect entry 🚀
🤖 SETAI Market News: AI Sector got hit hard
Trump’s 50% China tariff shock tanked the whole market. AI sector alone lost $5.2B, down -12.4%, marketcap now $33.3B
📈 Still some green:
🟣 FLOCK exploded +175% after Upbit & Bithumb listing
🟣 LPT +48.5% thanks to Upbit hype
🟣 DEXE (+12.1%) and NATIX (+10.5%) held strong - NATIX launched subnet on Bittensor
Still stacking AI bags? Share your play 💬
📈 SETAI News: PumpFun's $1B ICO - Massive moonshot or memecoin rug in disguise?
From zero to $735M revenue in a year, PumpFun went from a simple Solana tool to a memecoin juggernaut with its own AMM and mobile app.
Now, it’s reportedly preparing a $1B ICO at a $4B valuation, along with what could be Solana’s biggest airdrop ever, happening within 1–2 weeks.
If successful, it'd mark one of the largest DeFi fundrai…
They say 'Travel broadens the mind'
Here we are, traveling the blockchain biz, learning something new everyday.
Hello guys, update on: $TRADER & $AKA IDO Refund
While both AgentXYZ and Akarun are promising projects, after carefully reviewing feedback & performance, all parties have mutually agreed on a friendly refund in $USDT to ensure the best possible experience for our investors!
✔️ Transaction done: https://…
Came across this post from 7 years ago, probably a panic during downtrend after 2017's ATH.
Are we in the same situation? BTC just peaked $111K, already a bit lower now. How far do you think we're gonna get this time?
Rocket to another moon 📈 or Things are about to dip?📉
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
⚡️ SETAI Agents x SIX Network ⚡️
We’re proud to partner with SIX Network, one of the pioneers in blockchain adoption and RWA tokenization for businesses.
▫️Over $12M in assets secured on SIX Protocol!
▫️Backed by Thailand’s Web3 leaders: Bitkub, Cryptomind, BitcoinAddict & more!
👀 Together, we build secure, scalable blockchain solutions for real-world lifetime impact!
Meet us at:
SIX Netw…
❤15🔥11🐳4👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @SentientAI_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Trump vs. Musk Crypto Beef Edition
Pick your fighter 👇😄
✊ $TRUMP49%
🐕 $DOGE51%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2025 to 2 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 549,424 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@SentientAI_net named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@azen_protocol named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@azenaiagent named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SETAI Agents” (@SentientAI_net), 181,374 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SentientAI_net.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.