🔺An Engage-to-Earn Platform, where you immerse yourself in captivating missions 🌟
🟢 Powered by @GameFi_Official
🟣 Discuss about DMission: @DMission_Global
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2,994. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 338,476–342,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 17:45
338,925
-404
11 Aug 2026, 17:55
339,329
-345
10 Aug 2026, 17:56
339,674
-516
9 Aug 2026, 20:35
340,190
-470
8 Aug 2026, 22:27
340,660
-306
8 Aug 2026, 01:25
340,966
-473
7 Aug 2026, 04:57
341,439
-403
6 Aug 2026, 03:40
341,842
-77
6 Aug 2026, 00:53
341,919
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:02
341,919
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
201
Videos
39
Links
245
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 38s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,507 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
635
25.3%
🎉
512
20.4%
🔥
475
18.9%
👍
269
10.7%
🤩
223
8.90%
👏
139
5.54%
🥰
114
4.55%
😁
34
1.36%
😍
33
1.32%
❤🔥
30
1.20%
💯
11
0.439%
🤣
9
0.359%
🌚
7
0.279%
😭
7
0.279%
😇
3
0.12%
🐳
2
0.08%
🙏
2
0.08%
🕊
1
0.04%
🗿
1
0.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💯 NEW TASKS COMING 💯
This time, from The Originals and Whale Games
Airdrop: $200 USDT for 20 Luckiest Winners
Everyone got 7 days to join: May 12 - 19
🪼 dmission.me/missions/deposit-and-play-theoriginalsio
🪼 dmission.me/missions/welcome-to-whaleio
Remember, not financial advice buddies!
🚱 North Korea denies $577M crypto hack?
Innocent, or is this just another crazy cybersecurity cover-up?
North Korea just denied all allegations of hacking crypto, calling the claims fabrication by the US.
However, blockchain data reveals that suspected North Korean hackers stole $577 million in 2026 (about 76% of global crypto losses).
Rumor is that: NK directly funds MILITARY with this, make it a massive global …
🚱 Billionaire sues Trump Family’s crypto firm?
Justin Sun just filed a lawsuit against Trump's World Liberty Financial (WLFI). Why?
⚠️ It's allegedly illegally freezing Sun’s tokens (he spent $45M) + stripping away his governance voting rights.
WLFI has rejected these claims.
They call the lawsuit a desperate move to mask Sun's own alleged misconduct.
Which size are we on, brothers?
🩸Holding BIG crypto assets in France has become a nightmare?
Over 40 crypto-kidnappings have been reported in early 2026.
Criminals are now using violence instead of just hacking computers.
They torture victims or kidnap families to force instant transfers.
Showing off wealth on social media makes you a prime target.
Stay safe brothers!
🙂 Quantum Alert: BTC Hacked in 9 Minutes?
Google Quantum AI just proved that breaking Bitcoin's encryption is 20x easier than we thought. A 500,000-qubit computer could crack it in just 09 minutes.
Since Bitcoin takes 10 minutes to confirm a block, hackers could - outrun - your transaction. They’d snatch your private key, steal your coins before the network even records your transfer.
$444 Billion (6.7M BTC) is cu…
💣 JOIN CAPINFRA, GET $200 USDT PRIZE:
Hey it's here 🖥 dmission.me/missions/meet-capinfra-with-200usdt-pool
RWA, but gamified.
Capinfra turns ownership into gameplay - and the rewards are real.
AllSpark Research is outdoing themselves with this one.
Welcome to DMission!
Did you catch that $71,000 BTC pump today?
Finally some light in the chaos of 2026 👀
The crypto market just grabbed $60 billion in a single day
Total market cap has officially recovered to $2.32 trillion!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DMission_announcement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 744,401 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Domains linked from posts
4 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DMission Official Channel” (@DMission_announcement), 338,925 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DMission_announcement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.