Channel
@EMchina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
15,377subscribers
+74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001250493882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EMchina |
| Created | 22 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EMchina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 15,377 | +12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 15,365 | +24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 15,341 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 15,334 | +14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 15,320 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 15,312 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 15,308 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 15,303 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 15,303 | first reading |
158 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 158 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 325,654 |
| Reactions total | 484 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
427 reactions across 137 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 397 | 93.0% | |
| 🎉 | 30 | 7.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 157 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 484reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
공포? 공포가 어디? • 밤새 미국 시장의 VIX는 14pt로 하락. 기본적으로 올해 들어 가장 낮은 수준 • 골드만삭스 Ece Kepekci: "시장은 높은 불안에서 거의 공포가 없는 수준으로 전환. 여름 분위기와 해변 레저가 지금의 주제" ”恐慌“？哪有”恐慌”？ 隔夜，美股“恐慌指数”VIX跌至 14 点——基本上是今年以来的最低点； 高盛的Ece Kepekci对此总结得很好： “市场已经从高度焦虑转变为几乎没有恐慌……我想，夏日氛围和海滩休闲是当前的主题。” https://wallstreetcn.com/charts/41959578
❤2
7월 미국 재정적자 역대 같은기간 최대. 이자지출 이미 1조달러 돌파 • 재정적자 4320억달러로 역대 같은기간 최대치 • 의료보험 지출 급증 및 이자비용 상승이 주요인. 이번 회계연도 이자지출은 1.17조달러 돌파 & 전년대비 +15% 증가 • 미 대법원의 관세 조치 무효화 & 환급이 환불 재정수입 더욱 악화 美国7月预算赤字创同期纪录，本财年利息支出已破万亿 美国7月预算赤字达4320亿美元，创历年同期新高。医疗保险支出激增及债务利息成本攀升是主要推手，本财年利息支出已突破1.17万亿美元，同比增长15%。美最高法院裁定关税措施无效后的退款潮进一步压缩财政收入。 https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3779319#from=android
❤3
7월 정치국회의에서 통화정책 조정 시사 https://n.news.naver.com/article/421/0009111272?sid=104
❤3
MSCI EM/ACWI 장기-단기 상대성과 추이 • 장기: 변곡점 시작은 2024년말-2025년초 • 단기: 7월 글로벌 변동성 확대 국면에서 EM 상대성과 상당 수준 반납
❤2
최근 1개월 SPY vs. MAGS vs. DRAM
❤3
AI 매매, 더 이상의 동반 등락은 없음: 광학/데이터센터 선두. 메모리/전력 테마 뒤쳐짐(골드만삭스) • AI 부문 잠재 변동성은 다른 부문에 비해 여전히 3년래 높은 수준 지속. AI 분야에 대한 고객들의 재투자를 제약 • 골드만삭스 파생상품 트레이더는 연준에 대한 시장의 분위기는 7월 '금리 인상 공포'에서 기회에 가까운 낙관적인 기대로 전환. 그동안 존재했던 비대칭 기회 약화 • S&P500 연말 목표 8000pt 유지. 앞으로 한달 반 동안 상대적으로 좁은 범위 등락 예상. 전반적인 위험 대비 수익 매력 감소 전망 AI交易不再齐涨齐跌：光学网络与数据中心领跑，内存与电力主题掉队 AI板块的隐含波动率相对其他板块仍处三年高位，这对客户重新布局AI板块构成阻碍。高盛衍生品交易员Tuteja警告，市场对美联储的情绪已从7月的“加息恐惧”转向近乎“逢凶化吉”…
❤3
미국 여행 성수기 휘발유/경유 가격 모두 역대 같은기간 최고치 • 미국 휘발유와 경유 가격 모두 역대 같은기간 최고 수준으로 상승 • 8월 둘째 주 미국 휘발유 평균 가격은 갤런당 4달러, 경유는 갤런당 5.40달러. 현재 여행 성수기로 보통 수백만명의 미국인들이 차를 몰고 휴가 혹은 가족 방문 • 지난해 같은기간 휘발유 가격은 갤런당 3.20달러, 경유는 갤런당 3.70달러 美国出行旺季汽油与柴油价格均创历年同期新高 时值美国驾车出行旺季，汽油与柴油价格均升至历年同期最高水平。美国汽车协会数据显示，汽油和柴油价格均创历年同期新高。8月第二周，美国汽油平均价格达到每加仑4美元，柴油则达到每加仑5.40美元，均创历年同期新高。眼下正值出行旺季，通常有数以百万计的美国人驾车外出度假或探亲。去年同期，汽油价格为每加仑3.20美元，柴油为每加仑3.70美元。 https://wall…
❤2
4.683%. 2007년 이후 최고 https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4429866
❤2
딥시크 V4 Pro 정식버전 심야 공개: 여러 테스트에서 Fable 5 근접 • 딥시크 공식 홈페이지 API 문서 조용히 업데이트. 모델 버전은 V4 Pro 미리보기 버전에서 V4 Pro 0813로 전환 • 신규 모델은 1M 컨텍스트, 최대 384K 출력 지원 & API 가격 아직 인상되지 않은 상태. 다만 새 모델 업데이트 로그는 동기화되어 게시되지 않음 • 온라인 상에서 확인되는 평가 비교표에 따르면, 새로운 모델은 다수 테스트에서 앤트로픽 Claude Fable 5에 근접. V4 Pro 프리뷰 버전 크게 상회 DeepSeek V4 Pro正式版深夜“突袭”：多项测试逼近Fable 5，撞车Grok 4.6 DeepSeek官网API文档悄然更新，模型版本已从V4-Pro预览版切换至DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813，显示新模型支持1M上下文、最高3…
❤3
~ 12일(현지시간) 튀르키예 국영 아나돌루 통신은 파키스탄 정부 소식통을 인용해 “미국과 이란이 중재국인 파키스탄에 휴전 연장 승인 의사를 전달했으며, 정확한 연장 시한을 두고 추가 협의를 진행 중”이라고 보도했다 ~ 그러나 이란 측은 해당 보도를 즉각 반박했다. 로이터 통신에 따르면 이란 고위 소식통은 “미국과의 사이에서 휴전 연장에 관한 논의는 전혀 없다”며 “시작된 휴전 날짜 자체가 없으므로 연장할 것도 없다”고 밝혔다 https://n.news.naver.com/article/025/0003544005?sid=104
❤4
중국에서도 인용 보도 ======================== ~ 업계에서는 글로벌 통신 반도체 고객사의 유리기판 시제품 신뢰성 평가 인증을 얻지 못한 것을 원인으로 꼽는다. 이에 정통한 관계자는 "삼성전기가 신뢰성 평가를 통과하지 못하면서 투자 일정에도 제동이 걸린 것으로 안다"며 "시제품을 다시 제작해 제출해야 하는 만큼 기존 일정도 불가피하게 추가 지연될 것"이라고 말했다. 또 "당장 1~2주 안에 새로운 시제품을 만들 수 없기 때문에 연내 라인 투자 여부도 불투명한 상황"이라고 덧붙였다 https://www.thelec.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=60802
❤4🎉1
Ed Yardeni: S&P500 목표치 월가 최고로 상향. 2029년 1만선 목표 유지 • 견조한 기업 수익성 이유로 S&P500 목표치를 월가 최고 수준인 8400pt선으로 상향 조정. 기존 목표 8250pte도 이미 업계 최고. 2029년 10,000pt 목표 유지 • S&P500 EPS 전망치 상향 조정. 2026년 330달러에서 375달러, 2027년 375달러에서 415달러 Yardeni将标普500指数目标位上调至华尔街最高 维持2029年一万点目标 Yardeni Research总裁兼首席投资策略师Ed Yardeni在企业盈利表现“非常出色”后，将标普500指数目标位上调至8400点，创下华尔街最高水平。Yardeni此前给出的8250点目标位也已是业内最高。Yardeni维持标普500指数2029年达到10000点的目标不变。Yardeni同时上调标普500…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @EMchina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@EMchina edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 24,435 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영” (@EMchina), 15,377 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EMchina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.