Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -250. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,691–46,254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 15:49
45,935
-9
6 Nov 2026, 13:05
45,944
+28
5 Nov 2026, 12:06
45,916
+25
4 Nov 2026, 11:55
45,891
+42
3 Nov 2026, 15:16
45,849
+56
2 Nov 2026, 13:10
45,793
+28
1 Nov 2026, 11:35
45,765
+9
31 Oct 2026, 08:35
45,756
-25
30 Oct 2026, 08:48
45,781
-32
29 Oct 2026, 09:09
45,813
-32
28 Oct 2026, 10:28
45,845
+9
27 Oct 2026, 12:59
45,836
-9
26 Oct 2026, 13:51
45,845
-10
25 Oct 2026, 17:16
45,855
+9
24 Oct 2026, 18:06
45,846
-11
23 Oct 2026, 19:27
45,857
-8
22 Oct 2026, 16:06
45,865
-28
21 Oct 2026, 11:05
45,893
+17
20 Oct 2026, 10:00
45,876
+2
19 Oct 2026, 10:44
45,874
first reading
Engagement
756 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 45,935 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,480
239 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
239
of 756 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
756 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
1,549,640
Reactions total
141,483
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 02:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈15,700
Videos
≈4,850
Links
≈5,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 02m
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 182 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
441,552 reactions across 756 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
157,326
35.6%
👍
135,960
30.8%
😢
53,921
12.2%
❤
39,385
8.92%
🤬
38,566
8.73%
🤮
4,787
1.08%
🔥
3,790
0.858%
😁
3,032
0.687%
🤣
2,180
0.494%
👏
1,562
0.354%
🤡
838
0.19%
👎
205
0.046%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 756 of the 756 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 441,552 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 756 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 25 of 239 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Посилання на денний випуск у мене на ютюб-каналі: "Діалог—ВІДВЕРТО №1133/07.11. Знов «бонезнав»? Шикування довкола прапора? ЄС – комплімент на прощання? Та інше…" Запрошую:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKtb_kXEGmo
====
Нижче перелік і хронометраж запитань сьогоднішнього випуску:
00:00 Короткий вступ.
01:37 «Чергові плівки НАБУ і САП. Чергові викриття. А мене в усій цій історії цікавить зовсім інше - Васілій Ґала…
Зараз, о 18:00 починаємо ефір з паном Дмитром на його каналі Дмитро Ньюс. Запрошую:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEwwoaW61cI
====
Свій денний випуск з відповідями на запитання глядачів уже записав, але воно генерується в відповідну програму. Опрацюю та опублікую вже після нашого ефіру.
А от зараз добрі новини. І зразу виправляю свою помилку. Бо перше — Генштаб ЗСУ стверджує, що завдано удар по двох пусквих установках ОТРК Іскандер. От можна ж, коли хочеться і припече. Чи це вже знову із США та Європи мусили хвоста прищемити, чи самому дійшло, що брехати, як ми не маємо чим уражати ворожі пускові, більше не працює. Й кожне відбріхування ставало ніби явкою з повинною в зрадницькій діяльності проти ук…
Доки в мене тут трохи інші справи, маю нагоду борг повернути. Зовсім забув, що на Прямому вже опублікували наш ефір за четвер із Славою Вардою. Там не багато тем, але дуже розширено про пару тих, які мав би висвітлити тут чи на своєму ютюбі, а не завжди встигаю. То ось вони вже і є розкладені по поличках. Запрошую:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iav5INNGQz4
===
А в мене сьогодні о 18:00 ефір з паном Дмитром на його…
Речник генштабу рф Zеленський знову похвалився успішною атакою ворожої балістики: з 36 балістичних ракет проти Києва й Київщини захисникам України вдалося збити лише 4.
Але ж він саме цим "лише" реально хвалиться! Він не помітив, що поміняли мікрофон і це вже не звіт на москву, а запис для вірних українчиків?
А в нас удома темно й знову сухі крани. Попри неймовірну працю енергетиків і комунальників.
Ну, давайте трошки не лише про наших, але й про їхніх баранів... Трамп іде на рекорд. Цього тижня він почав закінчувати війну та оголошувати видатну й епохальну угоду вже навіть не раз, а двічі на день. А уявляєте, якщо пластинку заїсть? То він кінчатиме війну в Україні вже в режимі нон-стоп...
Щоправда, адекватні політики в США, як той же Марко Рубіо песимістичніші в прогнозах. Держсекретар не очікує жодного прорив…
Читав речника генштабу рашистської федерації Zеленського. Він пообіцяв українцям посилені удари балістикою, особливо по енергетиці й точно ж знав від господарів, що буде уражено Північний міст у Києві.
Так і сталося. Хоч у чомусь не збрехав. Міст уражений балістикою. Наслідки поки не фатальні, але відновлення забере час, а певності, чи конструкція не ослабла, таки нема, як і на Південному. Тому тепер і тут повне пер…
Так горять підстанції на Київщині. Туди прилітали ракети й реактивні дрони. Їх місця запусків і час підготовки до пусків нам з точнісю до метрів і хвилин надають союзні розвідки. Ну, не "супутник же Притули", якого не існує, нам надає фактаж у режимі реального часу.
Отже, цієї ночі, коли ворог продовжував добивати енергетику України та занурював у темряву й відсутність водопостачання Київ, від нас знову полетіло на …
От пацієнт із такою кашею та уривками несистемних думок в голові керує країною. Та ще й у час війни...
А тепер до отієї мантри, як отой Zе провів найбільшу в історії кількість візитів, а значить про щось таки домовився і чогось таки досягнув... Просто уявіть собі, що оце інтерв'ю з усім його каламутним потоком проходило з наперед узгодженими питаннями, на які йому Дмітрій Літвін завчасу написав відповіді й Zе хоч як…
«Карфаген має бути зруйнований». Так дві тисячі років тому закінчував кожну промову римський сенатор Катон. Сьогодні я кажу те саме: мафіозний Карфаген має бути зруйнований.
Країна опинилася між двома ударами. росія б'є по енергетиці й містах, мільйони людей знову рахують години без світла. А третій день ми слухаємо плівки НАБУ у справі «Карфаген», і від них холоне кров не менше, ніж від вибухів.
«Молотки чи кислот…
Послухайте та почитайте мудрого чоловіка — Петра Порошенка, який пробує щось довести й пояснити. А у відповідь... Згадалося про метання перлів перед свиньми. Але трошки заспокоює думка про раціоналізм Порошенка. Якби він був переконаний, що ситуація і з цією злочинною владою, і з тим багатоголосим совком, що їй якраз ідеально допасовується, уже зацементована й непорушна, то він би обрав якісь інші способи роботи. Ні,…
У продовження до попереднього тексту про те, як у нас пішла шалена кремлядізація населення, а що особливо дико — найшвидше та найупевненіше саме серед патріотичного сегменту, який до мокрих штанців боїться, щоб хтось не тикнув на них масним пальчиком та не назвав рашистськими іпсошниками чи тими, хто, викриваючи злочини влади, "дискредитують ЗСУ та підривають потужність оборони" (100% калька з нинішнього путінленду!)…
👍295💯134❤25🔥4😢4
Showing the 12 most recent of 756 posts we hold for @Chornovil_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Chornovil_official named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@washtimes named in 1 post, 4 November 2026 – 4 November 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЗАКРИТА ЗОНА | Володимир АРʼЄВ @zakrytazona · 42,947 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Дмитро Чекалкин @dmitriy_chekalkyn · 45,747 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
БРИГИНЕЦЬ🇺🇦 @bryhynets · 23,571 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 September 2026
Березовий Джем @bereza_jam · 20,609 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
🇺🇦 Софія Федина @Sofiya_Fedyna · 23,721 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
Печера Дракона @dragonspech · 41,328 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
NUSS + @nusspavlo · 21,116 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
ГОЛОБУЦЬКИЙ @allgolobutsky · 23,470 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж @rozumaha · 24,534 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Березовый сок @BerezaJuice · 143,517 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Європейська Солідарність @officialeurosolidarity · 19,360 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
MYROTVORETS NEWS @myrotvoretsnews · 24,136 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
Шалений Кіт @Shaleniy_Kit · 22,643 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
Prozapas @prozapas77 · 38,951 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
ПЕТРУШЕВСЬКИЙ @petrushevskyi · 69,736 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Omelyan News @Omelyan_News · 21,790 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 September 2026
💥BEREZOVIEW (Taras Berezovets) WAR IN UKRAINE @berezoview · 140,532 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Україна переможе! 🇺🇦❤️ @porohobotchenko · 21,744 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Будем всех бамбить! @budem_bambit · 20,554 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Путч. Русский - нах*й @putch111 · 32,295 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Портников @portnikov · 68,897 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Андрій Карпов @vata_show · 27,364 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
🇺🇦КУРБАНОВА🇺🇦 @KurbanovaNEWS · 36,575 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тарас Чорновіл 🇺🇦” (@Chornovil_official), 45,935 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chornovil_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.