Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сергей Поярков💪

Channel

Сергей Поярков💪

@SergyiPoyarkov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,746subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355136890
TypeChannel
Username@SergyiPoyarkov
Created25 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SergyiPoyarkov

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,74411,83811,7916 August 2026 — 11,838 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,838 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,837 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,833 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,825 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,819 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,815 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,809 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,803 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,796 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,789 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,788 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,778 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,799 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,797 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,794 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,792 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,783 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,780 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,778 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,773 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,772 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,767 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,764 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,751 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,744 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,746 subscribers11,7466 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,730–11,852 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:5511,746+2
15 Sept 2026, 09:0111,744-7
13 Sept 2026, 18:5911,751-13
11 Sept 2026, 22:1811,764-3
9 Sept 2026, 11:5711,767-5
6 Sept 2026, 06:1911,772-1
3 Sept 2026, 23:3611,773-5
2 Sept 2026, 12:4711,778-2
1 Sept 2026, 15:0511,780-3
31 Aug 2026, 12:1411,783-9
30 Aug 2026, 14:3711,792-1
29 Aug 2026, 16:0111,793-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:1411,794-3
26 Aug 2026, 16:3411,797-4
25 Aug 2026, 14:2411,801+2
24 Aug 2026, 17:2511,799+21
22 Aug 2026, 23:1311,778-10
21 Aug 2026, 11:5411,788-1
20 Aug 2026, 14:0311,789-1
19 Aug 2026, 15:4511,790first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 11,746 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,600
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held69 (23 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total55,190
Reactions total3,559
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 18s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25,228 reactions across 69 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5,87923.3%
👍5,84523.2%
💯4,97919.7%
🤣2,84511.3%
🤬1,2775.06%
🤮8503.37%
👏7913.14%
🔥7613.02%
😢4331.72%
4211.67%
🤡4111.63%
🏆1380.547%
💩1000.396%
👀770.305%
🙈670.266%
🤔640.254%
🎉580.23%
🤯580.23%
💊260.103%
😱240.095%
18 further kinds1240.492%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC≈1,010 views62 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/GKsEunyJ4Ek?si=aAXYdIBFACNDf2E9

👍50🤣9🏆2🔥1

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

2 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTC≈2,290 views285 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @AnneksiyaVideo

Димка, где ракеты?

😁153🤡101👏13🤬8💩7😭21

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

2 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTC≈2,710 views202 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Від прильотів над Києвом димне марево...

😢114🤬69🙏14🤔2🍌1🔥1🤡1

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

31 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC≈3,910 views213 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/dF03UzMMuoE?si=36GOGMR02sYp3g4W

👍157💯44🔥11😁1

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

31 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC≈3,860 views322 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Война - ерунда, ЛИШЬ БЫ НЕ ПОРОШЕНКО

😁189😢79👍16💯10🔥10🤣86🏆3

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

28 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC≈6,320 views479 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Не ну какая же она всё таки Мудрая, таки дала раввину себя защитить)))

😁340🤮75👍28🔥12🤣10💯9💘4💊1

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

28 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈5,670 views316 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/_I5klq7cUXs?si=BlvFVpVbgk70Qus8

💯261👍39🔥13🤯2👏1

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

27 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈6,450 views416 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Після ворожої атаки горять склади у Борисполі... За новинами спостерігаємо прямо із власної кухні

🤬299😢1073💔3🔥2🤣2

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

26 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈6,400 views221 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/ctBdIzXwvJY?si=e29YOLQHPQWyMGzv

👍159🤣602

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

26 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC≈5,440 views405 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @SandymustacheVideo

Сплошная деградация ценностей с нотками фашизма и русофобии. Ужас что творят Усы Пескова | Подключить наш VPN

👏216💯107👍4921😁12

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

25 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈5,280 views408 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Дала Мудрая Микитасю все самое сокровенное, показания взял суд, сокровенное взял Макс Микитась, неожинно вскочила в тройничёк, бывает. Мухи интима отдельно, котлеты показаний отдельно. Макс, а как ты теперь тёлочек то снимать будешь? Под запись они теперь даже под газом на тебя не поведутся, не дадут желаемое. Хотя, просто цена вопроса теперь... ну сам же планку задрал, такие цифры витают в водухе, такие цифры)))

😁253👍83🤣53🌚76🤮3🏆2🤡1

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

25 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈5,850 views230 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://youtu.be/G24HNbbyGLw?si=DcNfYLi6kkc8c4LX

👍170🔥29🤣204👏3💯3🏆1

Signed Sergey Poyarkov

Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @SergyiPoyarkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тарас Чорновіл 🇺🇦
@Chornovil_official · 45,909
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
Андрій Карпов Полтава
@vata_show · 26,282
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 September 2026
MUSIC VIBE 🇺🇦| Українська музика
@music_vibe_ua · 27,870
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
Дмитро Чекалкин
@dmitriy_chekalkyn · 46,568
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сергей Поярков💪” (@SergyiPoyarkov), 11,746 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SergyiPoyarkov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.